| Literature DB >> 24503695 |
Cheryl A London1, Luis Feo Bernabe1, Sandra Barnard1, William C Kisseberth1, Antonella Borgatti2, Mike Henson2, Heather Wilson3, Kiersten Jensen2, Daisuke Ito2, Jaime F Modiano2, Misty D Bear1, Michael L Pennell4, Jean-Richard Saint-Martin5, Dilara McCauley5, Michael Kauffman5, Sharon Shacham5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity of Selective Inhibitors of Nuclear Export (SINE) compounds that inhibit the function of the nuclear export protein Exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1) against canine tumor cell lines and perform a Phase I clinical trial of KPT-335 in dogs with spontaneous cancer to provide a preliminary assessment of biologic activity and tolerability. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24503695 PMCID: PMC3913620 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087585
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Biologic activity of SINE compounds against canine NHL cells.
(A) Jurkat cells and primary canine DLBCL cells (sample #1–5, #5 was independently tested twice) were cultured in 96-well plates for 72 hours with log serial dilutions of KPT-185 and the cell viability was analyzed using the MTS assay. Each experiment was performed in duplicate wells and experiments were repeated three times (B) Human and canine DLBCL cells were cultured in a 96-well plate for 72 hours with 3-fold serial dilutions (0–1000 nM) of KPT-335 and analyzed using the MTS assay. Each experiment was performed in duplicate wells and experiments were repeated three times. (C) CLBL1 cells and primary canine DLBCL cells (sample #1) were treated with 100 nM KPT-335 for 24 hours and analyzed for apoptosis using flow cytometry. Experiments were performed three times independently and the average results are shown. (D) Expression of XPO1 in human and canine DLBCL cell lines. Protein lysates prepared from OCI-Ly3, OCI-Ly10, and CLBL1 were separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting for XPO1; β-actin served as the control.
IC50 (± S.D.) of SINE for human and canine lymphoma cells.
| KPT-335 | KPT-185 | KPT-185 trans | |
| Jurkat | 0.3 | 8.7±0.7 | >1000 |
| OCI-Ly3 | 2.1±1.3 | 24.1 | NP |
| OCI-Ly10 | 41.8±21.0 | 246.2 | NP |
| CLBL1 | 8.5±4.1 | NP | NP |
| Canine DLBCLs | – | 13.3±6.2 | – |
| DLBCL#1 | 2.0 | 13.1 | NP |
| DLBCL#2 | NP | 9.0 | NP |
| DLBCL#3 | NP | 12.2 | NP |
| DLBCL#4 | NP | 4.9 | NP |
| DLBCL#5 | NP | 21.6 | >1000 |
IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma;
NP, not performed.
Figure 2Biologic activity of SINE compounds against canine tumor cell lines.
Canine tumor cell lines C2 (mast cell), OSA16 (osteosarcoma) and 323610-3 were cultured in 96 well plates in triplicate with serial dilutions of KPT-214 for 92 hours after which the plates were collected, media removed, and the plates were frozen at −80°C. Analysis for effects on cell proliferation was then performed using the CyQUANT assay according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Experiments were repeated three times; the IC50 for each cell line is shown.
Pharmacokinetics of KPT-335 in healthy dogs.
| Parameter | KPT-335 at 1.5 mg/kg |
|
| |
| Mean | 1.46 |
| SD | 0.0542 |
| SEM | 0.0221 |
|
| |
| Mean | 253 |
| SD | 88.3 |
| SEM | 36.1 |
|
| |
| Mean | 3.83 |
| SD | 2.71 |
| SEM | 1.11 |
|
| |
| Mean | 3.88 |
| SD | 1.47 |
| SEM | 0.602 |
|
| |
| Mean | 1810 |
| SD | 216 |
| SEM | 88.2 |
|
| |
| Mean | 1760 |
| SD | 223 |
| SEM | 90.9 |
Subject demographics.
| Characteristics | Dose Escalation | Dose Expansion |
|
| 17 | 6 |
|
| ||
| Median | 7.5 | 6.75 |
| Mean | 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Range | 4–11 | 4.5–8 |
|
| ||
| Median | 32 | 23.95 |
| Mean | 31.5 | 20.83 |
| Range | 6.2–66.7 | 4.5–31.4 |
|
| ||
| Male intact | 1 | 0 |
| Male neutered | 8 | 3 |
| Female intact | 1 | 0 |
| Female neutered | 7 | 3 |
|
| ||
| Lymphoma | 14 | 6 |
| Mast cell tumor | 2 | N/A |
| Osteosarcoma | 1 | N/A |
|
| ||
| Yes | 5 | 4 |
| No | 12 | 2 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 10 | 6 |
| No | 7 | 0 |
Constitutional and gastrointestinal toxicities.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of dogs | Lethargy | Anorexia | Weight Loss | Vomiting | Diarrhea | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| 1.25 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 1.5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 1.75 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 1.5 MWF | 6 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | ||||||||||
Hepatic and hematologic toxicities.
| Dose (mg/kg) | No. of dogs | ALP | ALT | Bilirubin | Anemia | Thrombo-cytopenia | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1.0 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 1.25 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| 1.5 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| 1.75 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| 2.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 1.5 MWF | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Figure 3Trends in quality of life in dogs treated with KPT-335.
An overall score was created based on answers to questions on the quality of life questionnaire. The scores from each question were summed resulting in an overall quality of life score which could range from 23 to 115. These are represented graphically in the figure above where scores for each patient are graphed over time (each line represents a patient). Trends in quality of life during the study were examined using linear mixed models. The overall quality of life did not change significantly in dogs treated in either the (A) dose escalation study (p = 0.64) or (B) dose expansion study (p = 0.47).