Literature DB >> 24503644

Simulating pad-electrodes with high-definition arrays in transcranial electric stimulation.

René Kempe1, Yu Huang, Lucas C Parra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research studies on transcranial electric stimulation, including direct current, often use a computational model to provide guidance on the placing of sponge-electrode pads. However, the expertise and computational resources needed for finite element modeling (FEM) make modeling impractical in a clinical setting. Our objective is to make the exploration of different electrode configurations accessible to practitioners. We provide an efficient tool to estimate current distributions for arbitrary pad configurations while obviating the need for complex simulation software. APPROACH: To efficiently estimate current distributions for arbitrary pad configurations we propose to simulate pads with an array of high-definition (HD) electrodes and use an efficient linear superposition to then quickly evaluate different electrode configurations. MAIN
RESULTS: Numerical results on ten different pad configurations on a normal individual show that electric field intensity simulated with the sampled array deviates from the solutions with pads by only 5% and the locations of peak magnitude fields have a 94% overlap when using a dense array of 336 electrodes. SIGNIFICANCE: Computationally intensive FEM modeling of the HD array needs to be performed only once, perhaps on a set of standard heads that can be made available to multiple users. The present results confirm that by using these models one can now quickly and accurately explore and select pad-electrode montages to match a particular clinical need.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24503644     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  14 in total

1.  Polarity-dependent modulation of multi-spectral neuronal activity by transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Mackenzie S Mills; Timothy J McDermott; Rachel K Spooner; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Effects of Electrode Drift in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Vaughn Bryant; Daniela Sacchetti; Felix Gervits; Roy Hamilton
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Intention Modulates the Effect of Punishment Threat in Norm Enforcement via the Lateral Orbitofrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Hongbo Yu; Yunlu Yin; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulating what is and what could have been: The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the evaluation of attained and unattained decision outcomes.

Authors:  Mascha van 't Wout; Hannah Silverman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the parietal cortex alters bias in item and source memory tasks.

Authors:  Denise Pergolizzi; Elizabeth F Chua
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Increased contextual cue utilization with tDCS over the prefrontal cortex during a recognition task.

Authors:  Denise Pergolizzi; Elizabeth F Chua
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  tDCS modulates behavioral performance and the neural oscillatory dynamics serving visual selective attention.

Authors:  Timothy J McDermott; Alex I Wiesman; Mackenzie S Mills; Rachel K Spooner; Nathan M Coolidge; Amy L Proskovec; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation dissociates fronto-visual theta lateralization during visual selective attention.

Authors:  Rachel K Spooner; Jacob A Eastman; Michael T Rezich; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Multielectrode Transcranial Electrical Stimulation of the Left and Right Prefrontal Cortices Differentially Impacts Verbal Working Memory Neural Circuitry.

Authors:  Sam M Koshy; Alex I Wiesman; Rachel K Spooner; Christine Embury; Michael T Rezich; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Minimal Heating at the Skin Surface During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Adantchede L Zannou; Fatima Zunara; Dennis Q Truong; Jacek Dmochowski; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2017-01-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.