Thomas B Newman1, David Draper, Karen M Puopolo, Soora Wi, Gabriel J Escobar. 1. From the *Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; †Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland; ‡Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA; §Division of Newborn Medicine, Children's Hospital; ¶Harvard Medical School; ‖Department of Newborn Medicine and Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; and **Department of Inpatient Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The absolute neutrophil count and the immature/total neutrophil ratio (I/T) provide information about the risk of early onset sepsis in newborns. However, it is not clear how to combine their potentially overlapping information into a single likelihood ratio. METHODS: We obtained electronic records of blood cultures and of complete blood counts with manual differentials drawn <1 hour apart on 66,846 infants ≥ 34 weeks gestation and <72 hours of age born at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Brigham and Women's Hospitals. We hypothesized that dividing the immature neutrophil count (I) by the total neutrophil count (T) squared (I/T) would provide a useful summary of the risk of infection. We evaluated the ability of the I/T to discriminate newborns with pathogenic bacteremia from other newborns tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c). RESULTS: Discrimination of the I/T (c = 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.82) was similar to that of logistic models with indicator variables for each of 24 combinations of the absolute neutrophil count and the proportion of immature neutrophils (c = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.83). Discrimination of the I/T improved with age, from 0.70 at <1 hour to 0.87 at ≥ 4 hours. However, 60% of I/T had likelihood ratios of 0.44-1.3, thus only minimally altering the pretest odds of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Calculating the I/T could enhance prediction of early onset sepsis, but the complete blood counts will remain helpful mainly when done at >4 hours of age and when the pretest probability of infection is close to the treatment threshold.
BACKGROUND: The absolute neutrophil count and the immature/total neutrophil ratio (I/T) provide information about the risk of early onset sepsis in newborns. However, it is not clear how to combine their potentially overlapping information into a single likelihood ratio. METHODS: We obtained electronic records of blood cultures and of complete blood counts with manual differentials drawn <1 hour apart on 66,846 infants ≥ 34 weeks gestation and <72 hours of age born at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Brigham and Women's Hospitals. We hypothesized that dividing the immature neutrophil count (I) by the total neutrophil count (T) squared (I/T) would provide a useful summary of the risk of infection. We evaluated the ability of the I/T to discriminate newborns with pathogenic bacteremia from other newborns tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c). RESULTS: Discrimination of the I/T (c = 0.79; 95% confidence interval: 0.76-0.82) was similar to that of logistic models with indicator variables for each of 24 combinations of the absolute neutrophil count and the proportion of immature neutrophils (c = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.83). Discrimination of the I/T improved with age, from 0.70 at <1 hour to 0.87 at ≥ 4 hours. However, 60% of I/T had likelihood ratios of 0.44-1.3, thus only minimally altering the pretest odds of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Calculating the I/T could enhance prediction of early onset sepsis, but the complete blood counts will remain helpful mainly when done at >4 hours of age and when the pretest probability of infection is close to the treatment threshold.
Authors: G J Escobar; T Zukin; M S Usatin; J Lemesurier; D Honeychurch; M A Armstrong; B Folck Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: G J Escobar; D K Li; M A Armstrong; M N Gardner; B F Folck; J E Verdi; B Xiong; R Bergen Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Gabriel J Escobar; Karen M Puopolo; Soora Wi; Benjamin J Turk; Michael W Kuzniewicz; Eileen M Walsh; Thomas B Newman; John Zupancic; Ellice Lieberman; David Draper Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-12-23 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: B C MacQueen; R D Christensen; B A Yoder; E Henry; V L Baer; S T Bennett; H M Yaish Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Ashkan Ojaghi; Gabriel Carrazana; Christina Caruso; Asad Abbas; David R Myers; Wilbur A Lam; Francisco E Robles Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Aurélien Bourquard; Alberto Pablo-Trinidad; Ian Butterworth; Álvaro Sánchez-Ferro; Carolina Cerrato; Karem Humala; Marta Fabra Urdiola; Candice Del Rio; Betsy Valles; Jason M Tucker-Schwartz; Elizabeth S Lee; Benjamin J Vakoc; Timothy P Padera; María J Ledesma-Carbayo; Yi-Bin Chen; Ephraim P Hochberg; Martha L Gray; Carlos Castro-González Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 4.379