Thankam P Thyvalikakath1, Michael P Dziabiak2, Raymond Johnson3, Miguel Humberto Torres-Urquidy4, Amit Acharya5, Jonathan Yabes6, Titus K Schleyer7. 1. Dental Informatics Core, Indiana University School of Dentistry, 1121 W Michigan Street, S316, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., 410 West 10th Street, Suite 2000, Indianapolis, IN, USA. Electronic address: tpt@iu.edu. 2. Office of Faculty Affairs, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 3. School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 5. Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 7. Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., 410 West 10th Street, Suite 2000, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite many decades of research on the effective development of clinical systems in medicine, the adoption of health information technology to improve patient care continues to be slow, especially in ambulatory settings. This applies to dentistry as well, a primary care discipline with approximately 137,000 practitioners in the United States. A critical reason for slow adoption is the poor usability of clinical systems, which makes it difficult for providers to navigate through the information and obtain an integrated view of patient data. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we documented the cognitive processes and information management strategies used by dentists during a typical patient examination. The results will inform the design of a novel electronic dental record interface. METHODS: We conducted a cognitive task analysis (CTA) study to observe ten general dentists (five general dentists and five general dental faculty members, each with more than two years of clinical experience) examining three simulated patient cases using a think-aloud protocol. RESULTS: Dentists first reviewed the patient's demographics, chief complaint, medical history and dental history to determine the general status of the patient. Subsequently, they proceeded to examine the patient's intraoral status using radiographs, intraoral images, hard tissue and periodontal tissue information. The results also identified dentists' patterns of navigation through patient's information and additional information needs during a typical clinician-patient encounter. CONCLUSION: This study reinforced the significance of applying cognitive engineering methods to inform the design of a clinical system. Second, applying CTA to a scenario closely simulating an actual patient encounter helped with capturing participants' knowledge states and decision-making when diagnosing and treating a patient. The resultant knowledge of dentists' patterns of information retrieval and review will significantly contribute to designing flexible and task-appropriate information presentation in electronic dental records.
BACKGROUND: Despite many decades of research on the effective development of clinical systems in medicine, the adoption of health information technology to improve patient care continues to be slow, especially in ambulatory settings. This applies to dentistry as well, a primary care discipline with approximately 137,000 practitioners in the United States. A critical reason for slow adoption is the poor usability of clinical systems, which makes it difficult for providers to navigate through the information and obtain an integrated view of patient data. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we documented the cognitive processes and information management strategies used by dentists during a typical patient examination. The results will inform the design of a novel electronic dental record interface. METHODS: We conducted a cognitive task analysis (CTA) study to observe ten general dentists (five general dentists and five general dental faculty members, each with more than two years of clinical experience) examining three simulated patient cases using a think-aloud protocol. RESULTS: Dentists first reviewed the patient's demographics, chief complaint, medical history and dental history to determine the general status of the patient. Subsequently, they proceeded to examine the patient's intraoral status using radiographs, intraoral images, hard tissue and periodontal tissue information. The results also identified dentists' patterns of navigation through patient's information and additional information needs during a typical clinician-patient encounter. CONCLUSION: This study reinforced the significance of applying cognitive engineering methods to inform the design of a clinical system. Second, applying CTA to a scenario closely simulating an actual patient encounter helped with capturing participants' knowledge states and decision-making when diagnosing and treating a patient. The resultant knowledge of dentists' patterns of information retrieval and review will significantly contribute to designing flexible and task-appropriate information presentation in electronic dental records.
Authors: S Blake Wachter; Jim Agutter; Noah Syroid; Frank Drews; Matthew B Weinger; Dwayne Westenskow Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003-03-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Caitlin M Cusack; George Hripcsak; Meryl Bloomrosen; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte A Weaver; Adam Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jim Walker; Lena Mamykina Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-09-08 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Thomas A Lasko; David A Owens; Daniel Fabbri; Jonathan P Wanderer; Julian Z Genkins; Laurie L Novak Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 2.342
Authors: Roosan Islam; Charlene R Weir; Makoto Jones; Guilherme Del Fiol; Matthew H Samore Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Andrew Stranieri; Kerryn Butler-Henderson; Tony Sahama; Pathirage Kamal Perera; Jonas Lima Da Silva; Danwin Pelonio; Sai Suman Manjunath; Dharini Raghavachar Journal: J Tradit Complement Med Date: 2016-07-12
Authors: Shuning Li; Anushri Singh Rajapuri; Grace Gomez Felix Gomez; Titus Schleyer; Eneida A Mendonca; Thankam P Thyvalikakath Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-03-28