Literature DB >> 24502552

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Spinal Metastases: Who Will Benefit the Most from SBRT?

Hae Jin Park1, Hee Jung Kim1, Jong-Ho Won2, Sang Chul Lee3, Ah Ram Chang4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate local control and survival in patients with spinal metastases who were treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using a CyberKnife, with or without a prior history of irradiation, and to identify prognostic factors predicting them. Between August 2008 and November 2012, 59 spinal metastatic lesions in 39 patients were treated with SBRT. Fourteen lesions (23.7%) were re-irradiated to treat recurrence after prior radiotherapy. Patients were treated with a median radiation dose of 27 Gy (range, 18-35 Gy) in a median of three fractions (range, one to five) using the CyberKnife Xsight Spine tracking system. Median planning target volume of the 59 spinal metastatic lesions was 37.4 cm(3) (range, 0.9-301.4 cm(3)). Radiation was prescribed to the median 80% isodose line that encompassed at least 90% of the tumor volume. The revised Tokuhashi scoring system and the Tomita scoring system were adopted to predict survival of patients. Local progression was defined as tumor progression by imaging, or if other therapy such as surgery or re-irradiation was given after SBRT, as salvage treatment. The median follow-up period was 7.4 months (range, 1.1-42.5 months). Four of 59 (6.8%) lesions experienced local progression, and all of them occurred within 1-year. Two of four local progressions occurred in re-irradiated tumors, which received 21 Gy in three fractions. With respect to treatment site-specific survival (TSS), better performance status and no visceral metastases were associated with a superior outcome (p = 0.011 and p = .001, respectively). With respect to overall survival (OS), better performance status was marginally related to superior outcome (p = 0.096). The revised Tokuhashi scoring system and the Tomita scoring system predicted OS and TSS in patients treated with SBRT. Two patients developed vertebral compression fractures at 1.2 and 1.4 months after SBRT with no evidence of tumor progression. There was no radiation-induced myelopathy. SBRT with a CyberKnife is a safe and effective treatment modality to achieve local control in spinal metastases patients, including those with a previous history of conventional RT. SBRT should be considered for those patients with a relatively indolent primary tumor, good performance status, and no visceral metastases. Survival of these patients can potentially be prolonged by long-term control of spinal metastases.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radiosurgery; Radiotherapy.; Spinal metastases; Stereotactic body radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24502552     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  8 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes of multileaf collimator-based CyberKnife for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nalee Kim; Ho Lee; Jin Sung Kim; Jong Geal Baek; Chang Geol Lee; Sei Kyung Chang; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The era of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases and the multidisciplinary management of complex cases.

Authors:  Rachit Kumar; Anick Nater; Ahmed Hashmi; Sten Myrehaug; Young Lee; Lijun Ma; Kristin Redmond; Simon S Lo; Eric L Chang; Albert Yee; Charles G Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-07-27

Review 3.  Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review.

Authors:  Lanlan Guo; Lixin Ke; Ziyi Zeng; Chuanping Yuan; Ziwei Wu; Lei Chen; Lixia Lu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications, Outcomes, and Points of Caution.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Tseng; Wietse Eppinga; Raphaele Charest-Morin; Hany Soliman; Sten Myrehaug; Pejman Jabehdar Maralani; Mikki Campbell; Young K Lee; Charles Fisher; Michael G Fehlings; Eric L Chang; Simon S Lo; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

Review 5.  Precision Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Spinal Tumors: Mechanism, Efficacy, and Issues.

Authors:  Hongqing Zhuang; Hongxia Zhuang; Ning Lang; Jiandong Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Systematic Review of the Role of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases.

Authors:  Katie L Spencer; Joanne M van der Velden; Erin Wong; Enrica Seravalli; Arjun Sahgal; Edward Chow; Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Helena M Verkooijen; Yvette M van der Linden
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Efficacy and safety of different fractions in stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yining Gong; Lingyi Xu; Hongqing Zhuang; Liang Jiang; Feng Wei; Zhongjun Liu; Yan Li; Miao Yu; Kaiwen Ni; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 8.  Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Malignancies.

Authors:  Virginia W Osborn; Anna Lee; Yoshiya Yamada
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.