Literature DB >> 24502361

Long-term function and morphology of the anal sphincters and the pelvic floor after primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

M M Soerensen1, B G Pedersen, G A Santoro, S Buntzen, K Bek, S Laurberg.   

Abstract

AIM: More than 50% of women experience deteriorating continence over time following primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. The objectives of this study were to assess the function and morphology of the anal sphincters and pelvic floor in women with long-term faecal incontinence after sphincter repair (primary end-point) and to evaluate their correlation with severity of incontinence (secondary end-point).
METHOD: The participants in this prospective study were recruited from a cohort of all women who sustained third or fourth degree obstetric sphincter injury reconstruction (cases) from January 1976 to November 1991. The women who delivered immediately before and after each case, without sustaining obstetric damage, were included as controls. Cases and controls were stratified into three categories: (i) continent; (ii) minor incontinence; and (iii) severe incontinence. The function and morphology of the anal sphincters and pelvic floor were evaluated by MRI, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and anorectal physiology tests.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine women (29 cases/30 controls; mean age 51/53 years; mean follow-up 23.7/24.1 years, respectively) were assessed. Morphologically, cases had a significantly shorter anterior external anal sphincter length compared with controls when evaluated by three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (8.6 vs 10.2 mm; P = 0.03). Functionally, cases with severe incontinence had a significantly shorter anterior sphincter length compared with cases with minor incontinence (7.7 vs 10.4 mm; P = 0.04). No correlation could be found between anal pressures and severity of incontinence in the case group.
CONCLUSIONS: Cases had a significantly shorter anterior external anal sphincter length. Functionally, anterior sphincter length correlated with increased severity of incontinence. Colorectal Disease
© 2014 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal sphincter repair; anorectal manometry; endoanal ultrasonography; faecal incontinence; obstetric anal sphincter injury; pelvic MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24502361     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  6 in total

1.  Can ultrasound 10 days after obstetric anal sphincter injury predict anal incontinence at long-term follow-up?

Authors:  Malou Barbosa; Peter Christensen; Karl Møller-Bek; Lise Brogaard; Marianne Glavind-Kristensen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Endoanal ultrasonography in fecal incontinence: Current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Andreia Albuquerque
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-10

3.  Structure-function relationship of the human external anal sphincter.

Authors:  Amanda M Stewart; Mark S Cook; Keisha Y Dyer; Marianna Alperin
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Is the extent of obstetric anal sphincter injury correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in the long term?

Authors:  L Luciano; M Bouvier; K Baumstarck; V Vitton
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Comparison of 3D endoanal ultrasound and external phased array magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Jaan Kirss; Heikki Huhtinen; Eini Niskanen; Jyrki Ruohonen; Marja Kallio-Packalen; Sarita Victorzon; Mikael Victorzon; Tarja Pinta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Is endoanal, introital or transperineal ultrasound diagnosis of sphincter defects more strongly associated with anal incontinence?

Authors:  Ingrid Volløyhaug; Annika Taithongchai; Linda Arendsen; Isabelle van Gruting; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.894

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.