BACKGROUND: Family functioning influences the course and long-term outcome for patients with depression. It is important to understand the family functioning of depressed patients from the viewpoint both of patients and their family members. The objective of this study was to explore the association between family functioning and depression in a sample of Chinese families, using the Family Assessment Device (FAD) and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II (FACES II). METHOD: This study was conducted in a sample of 61 depressed patients and their family members and 61 nonclinical controls in mainland China. It compared the perception of depressed patients and their family members and evaluated agreement between family members. RESULTS: Results indicate that in mainland China, functioning among families with a depressed family member is poorer than that of control families. Depressed patients reported less satisfaction than did their family members. There were significant differences on 4 of the 7 FAD scales among depressed patients and their family members, whereas no discrepancies were found on the FACES II. For the FAD, low agreement between patients and family members was found on all scales except behavioral control. Moderate agreement appeared on all dimensions of FACES II except for ideal cohesion and dissatisfaction with cohesion for the families of depressed patients. CONCLUSIONS: Depression is associated with impaired family functioning in families in mainland China. When applying the FAD and FACES II to samples of Chinese families, clinicians should be aware that the FAD may be more sensitive to detecting problems in some areas than the FACES II.
BACKGROUND: Family functioning influences the course and long-term outcome for patients with depression. It is important to understand the family functioning of depressedpatients from the viewpoint both of patients and their family members. The objective of this study was to explore the association between family functioning and depression in a sample of Chinese families, using the Family Assessment Device (FAD) and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II (FACES II). METHOD: This study was conducted in a sample of 61 depressedpatients and their family members and 61 nonclinical controls in mainland China. It compared the perception of depressedpatients and their family members and evaluated agreement between family members. RESULTS: Results indicate that in mainland China, functioning among families with a depressed family member is poorer than that of control families. Depressedpatients reported less satisfaction than did their family members. There were significant differences on 4 of the 7 FAD scales among depressedpatients and their family members, whereas no discrepancies were found on the FACES II. For the FAD, low agreement between patients and family members was found on all scales except behavioral control. Moderate agreement appeared on all dimensions of FACES II except for ideal cohesion and dissatisfaction with cohesion for the families of depressedpatients. CONCLUSIONS:Depression is associated with impaired family functioning in families in mainland China. When applying the FAD and FACES II to samples of Chinese families, clinicians should be aware that the FAD may be more sensitive to detecting problems in some areas than the FACES II.
Authors: Johanna B Folk; Larry K Brown; Brandon D L Marshall; Lili M C Ramos; Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan; Daphne Koinis-Mitchell; Marina Tolou-Shams Journal: J Youth Adolesc Date: 2019-08-10
Authors: Xin Yi Li; Qian Liu; Pan Chen; Juan Ruan; Xuan Gong; Dan Luo; Yang Zhou; Cong Yin; Xiao Qin Wang; Lianzhong Liu; Bing Xiang Yang Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Ling Wang; Xi-Wang Fan; Xu-Dong Zhao; Bing-Gen Zhu; Hong-Yun Qin Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-05 Impact factor: 3.390