Literature DB >> 24501063

Quantification of excess water loss in plant canopies warmed with infrared heating.

Hans J De Boeck1, Bruce A Kimball, Franco Miglietta, Ivan Nijs.   

Abstract

Here we investigate the extent to which infrared heating used to warm plant canopies in climate manipulation experiments increases transpiration. Concerns regarding the impact of the infrared heater technique on the water balance have been raised before, but a quantification is lacking. We calculate transpiration rates under infrared heaters and compare these with air warming at constant relative humidity. As infrared heating primarily warms the leaves and not the air, this method increases both the gradient and the conductance for water vapour. Stomatal conductance is determined both independently of vapour pressure differences and as a function thereof, while boundary layer conductance is calculated using several approaches. We argue that none of these approaches is fully accurate, and opt to present results as an interval in which the actual water loss is likely to be found. For typical conditions in a temperate climate, our results suggest a 12-15% increase in transpiration under infrared heaters for a 1 °C warming. This effect decreases when stomatal conductance is allowed to vary with the vapour pressure difference. Importantly, the artefact is less of a concern when simulating heat waves. The higher atmospheric water demand underneath the heaters reflects naturally occurring increases of potential evapotranspiration during heat waves resulting from atmospheric feedback. While air warming encompasses no increases in transpiration, this fully depends on the ability to keep humidity constant, which in the case of greenhouses requires the presence of an air humidification system. As various artefacts have been associated with chamber experiments, we argue that manipulating climate in the field should be prioritized, while striving to limit confounding factors. The excess water loss underneath infrared heaters reported upon here could be compensated by increasing irrigation or applying newly developed techniques for increasing air humidity in the field.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artefact; climate manipulation; heat wave; plant canopy; transpiration; warming technique

Year:  2012        PMID: 24501063     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02734.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  7 in total

1.  C₃ and C₄ plant responses to increased temperatures and altered monsoonal precipitation in a cool desert on the Colorado Plateau, USA.

Authors:  Timothy M Wertin; Sasha C Reed; Jayne Belnap
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Global warming can negate the expected CO2 stimulation in photosynthesis and productivity for soybean grown in the Midwestern United States.

Authors:  Ursula M Ruiz-Vera; Matthew Siebers; Sharon B Gray; David W Drag; David M Rosenthal; Bruce A Kimball; Donald R Ort; Carl J Bernacchi
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Sensitivity of cold acclimation to elevated autumn temperature in field-grown Pinus strobus seedlings.

Authors:  Christine Y Chang; Faride Unda; Alexandra Zubilewich; Shawn D Mansfield; Ingo Ensminger
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  Carbon cycling in temperate grassland under elevated temperature.

Authors:  Anne B Jansen-Willems; Gary J Lanigan; Ludger Grünhage; Christoph Müller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Coordination of leaf functional traits under climatic warming in an arid ecosystem.

Authors:  Hongying Yu; Yingting Chen; Guangsheng Zhou; Zhenzhu Xu
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.260

6.  Infrared warming reduced winter wheat yields and some physiological parameters, which were mitigated by irrigation and worsened by delayed sowing.

Authors:  Shibo Fang; Hua Su; Wei Liu; Kaiyan Tan; Sanxue Ren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Controlled infrared heating of an artic meadow: challenge in the vegetation establishment stage.

Authors:  Christophe Moni; Hanna Silvennoinen; Bruce A Kimball; Erling Fjelldal; Marius Brenden; Ingunn Burud; Andreas Flø; Daniel P Rasse
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 4.993

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.