Literature DB >> 24500661

Increase in intraocular pressure is less with propofol than with sevoflurane during laparoscopic surgery in the steep Trendelenburg position.

Young-Chul Yoo1, Seokyung Shin, Eun Kyeong Choi, Chan Yun Kim, Young Deuk Choi, Sun-Joon Bai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraocular pressure is increased during laparoscopic surgeries performed in a steep Trendelenburg position. This study compared the effects of propofol with those of sevoflurane on intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a 30° Trendelenburg position.
METHODS: Sixty-six patients were randomly allocated to a maintenance anesthetic consisting of remifentanil and sevoflurane (Sevoflurane Group) or remifentanil and propofol (Propofol Group). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured at nine predefined time points, including baseline (T0), five minutes after establishing pneumoperitoneum (T2), 30 min after establishing the Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum (T3), five minutes after returning to the horizontal position (T4), and immediately after tracheal extubation (T6). The primary outcome was the change in intraocular pressure from T0 to T3.
RESULTS: The results of linear mixed model analysis showed that intraocular pressure differed between the two groups (P = 0.0039). At T3, the mean (SD) IOP was greater in the Sevoflurane Group [23.5 (4.3) mmHg] than in the Propofol Group [19.9 (3.8) mmHg] (P = 0.0019). At T2 and T6, IOP was also greater in the Sevoflurane Group than in the Propofol Group (P = 0.038 and P = 0.009, respectively). There was a statistically significant increase in intraocular pressure from baseline to T3 (pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenberg) in the Sevoflurane Group [6.0 (5.0) mmHg; P < 0.001] but not in the Propofol Group [2.1 (5.1) mmHg; P = 0.136]. None of the patients experienced ocular complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular pressure increases after pneumoperitoneum and the steep Trendelenburg position are established. This increase is less with propofol than with sevoflurane anesthesia. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01744262.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500661     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0112-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  17 in total

1.  Does steep Trendelenburg positioning effect the ocular hemodynamics and intraocular pressure in patients undergoing robotic cystectomy and robotic prostatectomy?

Authors:  Muhammet Fuat Ozcan; Ziya Akbulut; Canan Gurdal; Sinan Tan; Yelda Yildiz; Serdar Bayraktar; Ayse Nur Ozcan; Kemal Ener; Serkan Altinova; Muhammed Ersagun Arslan; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Suzanne Forsyth Herling; Bjørn Dreijer; Gitte Wrist Lam; Thordis Thomsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-04

3.  Variation in intraocular pressure caused by repetitive positional changes during laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing propofol and desflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Kwon Hui Seo; Yong-Shin Kim; Jindeok Joo; Jin-Woo Choi; Hong-Soo Jeong; Si-Wook Chung
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Are you seeing this: the impact of steep Trendelenburg position during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on intraocular pressure: a brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert S Ackerman; Jonathan B Cohen; Rosemarie E Garcia Getting; Sephalie Y Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-07-25

5.  The effect of colonoscopy on intraocular pressure: an observational prospective study.

Authors:  Ilan Kent; Noa Geffen; Assaf Stein; Yaron Rudnicki; Asaf Friehmann; Shmuel Avital
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Comparison of intraocular pressure during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Taniya Bhoopat; Pawan Chansaenroj
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Stefanie Beck; Haissam Ragab; Dennis Hoop; Aurélie Meßner-Schmitt; Cornelius Rademacher; Ursula Kahl; Franziska von Breunig; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Christian Zöllner; Marlene Fischer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  The Intraocular Pressure under Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade during Low-Pressure Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Young-Chul Yoo; Na Young Kim; Seokyung Shin; Young Deuk Choi; Jung Hwa Hong; Chan Yun Kim; HeeJoon Park; Sun-Joon Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transient but significant visual field defects after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in deep tRendelenburg position.

Authors:  Yukako Taketani; Chihiro Mayama; Noriyuki Suzuki; Akiko Wada; Tatsuhiro Oka; Kazuya Inamochi; Yohei Nomoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review.

Authors:  Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot; Kees C J H M van Laarhoven; Gert-Jan Scheffer; Sjaak Pouwels; Kim E Wever; Michiel C Warlé
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.