Literature DB >> 24500584

Surgical site infection in orthopaedic oncology.

Gertraud Gradl1, Pieter Bas de Witte2, Brady T Evans3, Francis Hornicek3, Kevin Raskin3, David Ring3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study addressed risk factors for surgical site infection in patients who had undergone orthopaedic oncology surgical procedures.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data on 1521 orthopaedic oncologic surgical procedures in 1304 patients. We assessed patient demographics, updated Charlson comorbidity index, surgery-specific data, and treatment-related data and attempted to identify predictors of surgical site infection with bivariate and multivariable analysis.
RESULTS: Eight factors independently predicted surgical site infection: body mass index (odds ratio [OR]:, 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.07), age (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.33), total number of preceding procedures (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.34), preexisting implants (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.17 to 3.21), infection at another site on the date of the surgery (OR: 4.13, 95% CI: 1.57 to 10.85), malignant disease (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.94 to 2.26), hip region affected (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.84), and duration of the procedure (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.25).
CONCLUSIONS: These factors can inform patients and surgeons of the probability of surgical site infection after orthopaedic oncologic surgery. While most risk factors are unmodifiable or related to the complexity of the case, infection at another site on the date of the surgery is one factor amenable to intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500584     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  5 in total

1.  Surgical site infection in hand surgery.

Authors:  Mariano E Menendez; Na Lu; Sebastian Unizony; Hyon K Choi; David Ring
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Risk factors for postoperative deep infection in bone tumors.

Authors:  Shinji Miwa; Toshiharu Shirai; Norio Yamamoto; Katsuhiro Hayashi; Akihiko Takeuchi; Kaoru Tada; Yoshitomo Kajino; Hiroyuki Inatani; Takashi Higuchi; Kensaku Abe; Yuta Taniguchi; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Comparison of Porous Tantalum Acetabular Implants and Harrington Reconstruction for Metastatic Disease of the Acetabulum.

Authors:  Matthew T Houdek; Peter C Ferguson; Matthew P Abdel; Anthony M Griffin; Mario Hevesi; Kevin I Perry; Peter S Rose; Jay S Wunder; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

4.  LUMiC® Endoprosthetic Reconstruction After Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Short-term Results.

Authors:  Michaël P A Bus; Andrzej Szafranski; Simen Sellevold; Tomasz Goryn; Paul C Jutte; Jos A M Bramer; M Fiocco; Arne Streitbürger; Daniel Kotrych; Michiel A J van de Sande; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Orthopaedic Oncology - A Narrative Review of Current Concepts.

Authors:  Daniel Müller; Dominik Kaiser; Kati Sairanen; Thorsten Studhalter; İlker Uçkay
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2019-10-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.