Literature DB >> 24499996

[Quality of documentation of intraoperative and postoperative complications : improvement of documentation for a nationwide quality assurance program and comparison with routine data].

J Jakob1, D Marenda, M Sold, M Schlüter, S Post, P Kienle.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Complications after cholecystectomy are continuously documented in a nationwide database in Germany. Recent studies demonstrated a lack of reliability of these data. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of a control algorithm on documentation quality and the use of routine diagnosis coding as an additional validation instrument.
METHODS: Completeness and correctness of the documentation of complications after cholecystectomy was compared over a time interval of 12 months before and after implementation of an algorithm for faster and more accurate documentation. Furthermore, the coding of all diagnoses was screened to identify intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The sensitivity of the documentation for complications improved from 46 % to 70 % (p = 0.05, specificity 98 % in both time intervals). A prolonged time interval of more than 6 weeks between patient discharge and documentation was associated with inferior data quality (incorrect documentation in 1.5 % versus 15 %, p < 0.05). The rate of case documentation within the 6 weeks after hospital discharge was clearly improved after implementation of the control algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity of screening for complications by evaluating routine diagnoses coding were 70 % and 85 %, respectively. The quality of documentation was improved by implementation of a simple memory algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24499996     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-013-2696-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  8 in total

1.  Completeness and accuracy of voluntary reporting to a national case registry of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E Dreisler; L Schou; S Adamsen
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience.

Authors:  Leon G Fine; Bruce E Keogh; Shan Cretin; Maria Orlando; Mairi M Gould
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

3.  [Quality assurance using routine data. Is outcome quality now measurable?].

Authors:  T Kostuj; R Smektala
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  [Study of the quality of codification of diagnoses and procedures under DRG conditions].

Authors:  B Klaus; A Ritter; H Grosse Hülsewiesche; B Beyrle; H-U Euler; H Fender; M Hübner; G von Mittelstaedt
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2005-01

5.  Toward optimal recording of surgical complications: concurrent tracking compared to the discharge data set.

Authors:  Daniel J Bertges; Steven R Shackford; Adam K Cloud; Janet Stiles; Andrew C Stanley; Georg Steinthorsson; Michael A Ricci; John Ratliff; Rebecca R Zubis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  [Are hospital administrative data suitable for external quality assurance? Comparison of quality indicators based on separate statutory data collections (BQS) and hospital administrative data].

Authors:  C Maass; W Schleiz; M Weyermann; S E Drösler
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  The accuracy of complications documented in a prospective complication registry.

Authors:  Eelco J Veen; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Eelke Bosma; Maryska A C de Jongh; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  [Evaluation of data on surgical complications after cholecystectomy submitted to a nationwide quality assurance program (BQS) in Germany].

Authors:  J Jakob; M Hinzpeter; C Weiss; J Weiss; M Schlüter; S Post; P Kienle
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.955

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [The validity of routine data on quality assurance: A qualitative systematic review].

Authors:  E Hanisch; T F Weigel; A Buia; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Evaluation of interventions to improve inpatient hospital documentation within electronic health records: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natalie Wiebe; Lucia Otero Varela; Daniel J Niven; Paul E Ronksley; Nicolas Iragorri; Hude Quan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Quality assurance in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christos Koutras; Isabel Becker; Stavros A Antoniou; Hansjoerg Heep
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-24

4.  Quality assurance in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christos Koutras; Isabel Becker; Stavros A Antoniou; Hansjoerg Heep
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-24

Review 5.  [Effects of statutory quality assurance in acute inpatient care].

Authors:  Max Geraedts; Werner de Cruppé
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.