Literature DB >> 24499759

Transabdominal ultrasonography as a screening test for second-trimester placenta previa.

Hayley S Quant1, Alexander M Friedman, Eileen Wang, Samuel Parry, Nadav Schwartz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the test characteristics of transabdominal ultrasonography as a screening test for second-trimester placenta previa.
METHODS: This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study evaluated the distance from the placental edge to the internal os (placenta-cervix distance) through both transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography during the anatomic survey. Patients were recruited in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Ultrasound Unit at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, an urban tertiary care center. Transabdominal placenta-cervix distance cutoffs with high sensitivity for detection of previa and low-lying placenta were identified, and test characteristics were calculated. Follow-up ultrasound data, pregnancy, and delivery outcomes for those with second-trimester previa or low-lying placenta were obtained.
RESULTS: One thousand two hundred fourteen women were included in the analysis. A transabdominal placenta-cervix distance cutoff of 4.2 cm was 93.3% sensitive and 76.7% specific for detection of previa with a 99.8% negative predictive value at a screen-positive rate of 25.0%. A cutoff of 2.8 cm was 86.7% sensitive and 90.5% specific with a 99.6% negative predictive value at a screen-positive rate of 11.4%. Only 9.8% (four of 41) of previas and low-lying placentas persisted through delivery.
CONCLUSION: Transabdominal ultrasonography is an effective screening test for second-trimester placenta previa. At centers not performing universal transvaginal ultrasonography at the time of the anatomic survey, evidence-based transabdominal placenta-cervix distance cutoffs can optimize the identification of patients who require further surveillance for previa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24499759     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Effect of types of placenta previa on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a 10-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shilei Bi; Lizi Zhang; Zhijian Wang; Jingsi Chen; Jingman Tang; Jingjin Gong; Sushan Xie; Lin Lin; Luwen Ren; Shanshan Zeng; Lijun Huang; Shaoshuai Wang; Lili Du; Dunjin Chen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Measuring leading placental edge to internal cervical os: Transabdominal versus transvaginal approach.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway; Jon Hyett; Lars Henning Pedersen
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-09-15

3.  Analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes using cervical cerclage or conservative treatment in singleton gestations with a sonographic short cervix.

Authors:  Xiaoxiu Huang; Ruizhe Chen; Baohua Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Epidemiology of placenta previa accreta: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eric Jauniaux; Lene Grønbeck; Catey Bunce; Jens Langhoff-Roos; Sally L Collins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The Risk of Obstetrical Hemorrhage in Placenta Praevia Associated with Coronavirus Infection Antepartum or Intrapartum.

Authors:  Irina Pacu; Nikolaos Zygouropoulos; Alina Elena Cristea; Cristina Zaharia; George-Alexandru Rosu; Alexandra Matei; Liana-Tina Bodei; Adrian Neacsu; Cringu Antoniu Ionescu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.948

6.  Prevalence and Fetomaternal Outcome of Placenta Previa at Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain.

Authors:  Fatema Alhubaishi; Naeema Mahmood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.