Literature DB >> 24499575

A video clip of the biting midge Culicoides anophelis ingesting blood from an engorged Anopheles mosquito in Hainan, China.

Yajun Ma1, Jiannong Xu, Zhenzhou Yang, Xiaohua Wang, Zhongling Lin, Wei Zhao, Yan Wang, Xiangyu Li, Hua Shi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biting midges are hematophagus ectoparasites of insects, humans and other animals. Culicoides (Trithicoides) anophelis Edwards1922 is a predator of engorged mosquitoes.
FINDINGS: In a field trip of wild mosquito collections, C. anophelis was found on two Anopheles mosquitoes. One mosquito with a midge clinging onto its abdomen was caught on video demonstrating the act of the midge taking blood from the engorged mosquito Anopheles vagus. The midge C. anophelis has a broad host range. Documented in the literature, the midge has been found in various mosquito species in the genera Anopheles, Culex, Aedes and Armigeres.
CONCLUSIONS: A video clip was presented demonstrating a midge taking blood from an engorged mosquito. The host promiscuity of C. anophelis raises a concern about its potential as a mechanic or biological vector to spread viruses among mosquito populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24499575      PMCID: PMC3833289          DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasit Vectors        ISSN: 1756-3305            Impact factor:   3.876


Findings

The biting midge Culicoides (Trithecoides) anophelis Edwards is a predator of engorged mosquitoes, which was first described by Edwards in 1922 [1]. Later in 1947, Liard reported a C. anophelis sucking engorged blood from the abdomen of a flying mosquito Armigeres lacuum[2]. In the 1950s, C. anophelis was found on the mosquitoes in the genera Aedes, Anopheles, Armigeres and Culex mosquitoes in Hainan, China [3]. There are several reports of the midge in India [4,5]. Here we report two anopheline mosquitoes that were attacked by C. anophelis, and one scene was caught on video demonstrating the act of a midge taking blood from an engorged mosquito. The observation was made in the course of a mosquito collection on the evening of August 10, 2013 in Yanfeng, Haikou, Hainan Province, China. Mosquitoes were attracted and trapped in a net trap inside which a cow was placed. The trapped mosquitoes were caught by an electronic aspirator and released into a cage and brought back to the laboratory for further processing. When sorting out mosquitoes, one mosquito was found to have a midge clinging to its abdomen (Figure 1). The mosquito was identified as Anopheles sinensis and the midge was identified as C. anophelis. The next day, another mosquito collection was carried out using the same baited trap. Among the mosquitoes collected, another mosquito was found carrying a midge. The mosquito and midge were chloroformed lightly, the mosquito was immobilised and the midge was active and hanging onto the mosquito abdomen. The mosquito and midge were placed under a stereo microscope (Nickon SMZ745T). A video was recorded with a camera (Additional file 1). On the video footage, the midge firmly attached itself to the mosquito via the mouthparts that had penetrated the lateral part of the fourth segment of the engorged abdomen. The midge abdomen distended with blood in it. Periodically the legs were moving agitatedly. About 3 minutes later, the midge was trying to remove its mouthparts from the mosquito. It appeared difficult to unplug the proboscis, the midge rotated 180° with the mouthparts inside the abdomen and finally detached from the mosquito. The steady attachment may be attributed to the structure of the mouthparts [6,7], which ensures that midges can hang onto flying mosquitoes while ingesting blood. Documented by Edwards (1922) and Chhila and Chaudhry (2010), the midge could remain attached to its host mosquito for 48–56 hr [1,4]. The mosquito was identified as An. vagus, and the midge was identified as C. anophelis by morphology [1].
Figure 1

A midge of attached to the abdomen of the mosquito

A midge of attached to the abdomen of the mosquito At least 19 mosquito species in the genera Anopheles, Culex, Aedes and Armigeres have been documented as hosts of C. anophelis (Table 1). These data indicate that C. anophelis has a broad host range. Furthermore, the infestation is commonly seen in the mosquito specimens in field collections [1-3]. In a recent report the midges were found on 8 of 11 (72.7%) An. stephensi collected in cattle sheds in India [4]. In another report from India, the prevalence of C. anophelis was 6.7% (87/1297) in five midge collections from April to August in 2004 [5]. Interestingly, in the same report, some of C. anophelis were caught directly on cattle and buffaloes, which indicates that C. anophelis can feed on animals other than mosquitoes [5]. Certain mosquitoes and Culicoides midges are vectors for arboviruses that cause human and/or animal diseases, such as mosquito-borne Dengue virus, West Nile virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, and midge-borne bluetongue virus, Oropouche virus and Schmallenberg virus [8-10]. The fact that C. anophelis takes blood from a broad range of mosquitoes raised a concern that the midge may serve as a mechanism for biological vectors to spread viruses among mosquito populations. However, to the best of our knowledge, except the mosquito infestation reports, little is known about the behavior, ecology and genetics of C. anophelis. No data are available regarding the vector potentials for C. anophelis. Additionally, host preference of midges is one of the critical determinants of vector competence of midge-borne diseases [11,12]. The host preference is largely determined by blood source identification [12-17]. It might be a potential issue for midge blood meal analysis in the circumstances when C. anophelis specimens are present in a midge collection if specimens are not carefully identified, because the blood source of C. anophelis would be derived from the animals that mosquitoes feed on. The significant lack of knowledge about C. anophelis definitely warrants further investigations to increase the understanding of the midge.
Table 1

Mosquito species known to be infested by

Mosquito speciesReference
Aedes vexans
3
Anopheles aconitus
1
Anopheles annularis
2
Anopheles fuliginosus
1
Anopheles hyrcanus
1
Anopheles karwari
1,2
Anopheles maculatus
2
Anopheles maculipennis
2
Anopheles nigerrimus
2
Anopheles sinensis
2, 3, current
Anopheles stephensi
4
Anopheles umbrosus
1
Anopheles vagus
1,2,3, current
Armigeres lacuum
2
Armigere sobturbans
3
Culex bitaeniorhynchus
3
Culex fatigans
3
Culex tritaeniorhynchus
3
Culex whitmorei3
Mosquito species known to be infested by

Ethical approval

The study was carried out with the full approval of cow keepers and sampling was undertaken with approval of Yanfeng County, Haikou City, Hainan Province, China.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors made contribution to the collection of insects. YM, JX and ZY discussed the paper structure, and JX and YM wrote the manuscript. HS edited the video. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Additional file 1

A midge is ingesting blood from an engorged mosquito Click here for file
  9 in total

1.  Host feeding patterns of Culicoides species (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) within the Picos de Europa National Park in northern Spain.

Authors:  J H Calvo; B Berzal; C Calvete; M A Miranda; R Estrada; J Lucientes
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Molecular identification of bloodmeals from biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides Latreille) in Denmark.

Authors:  Sandra Boline Lassen; Søren A Nielsen; Henrik Skovgård; Michael Kristensen
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Contribution to the knowledge of Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) host preferences in France.

Authors:  Camille Ninio; Denis Augot; Jean-Claude Delecolle; Barbara Dufour; Jerome Depaquit
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  Culicoides biting midges: their role as arbovirus vectors.

Authors:  P S Mellor; J Boorman; M Baylis
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Molecular identification of bloodmeals and species composition in Culicoides biting midges.

Authors:  E Videvall; S Bensch; M Ander; J Chirico; R Sigvald; R Ignell
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.739

6.  Host preferences of Palaearctic Culicoides biting midges: implications for transmission of orbiviruses.

Authors:  E Viennet; C Garros; L Gardès; I Rakotoarivony; X Allène; R Lancelot; D Crochet; C Moulia; T Baldet; T Balenghien
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.739

Review 7.  Present and future arboviral threats.

Authors:  Scott C Weaver; William K Reisen
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 5.970

Review 8.  Culicoides biting midges, arboviruses and public health in Europe.

Authors:  Simon Carpenter; Martin H Groschup; Claire Garros; Maria Luiza Felippe-Bauer; Bethan V Purse
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.970

9.  Identity and diversity of blood meal hosts of biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae: Culicoides Latreille) in Denmark.

Authors:  Sandra B Lassen; Søren Achim Nielsen; Michael Kristensen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.876

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Blood meal analysis of culicoides (Diptera: ceratopogonidae) in central Tunisia.

Authors:  Darine Slama; Najoua Haouas; Habib Mezhoud; Hamouda Babba; Emna Chaker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Profiling of RNA Viruses in Biting Midges (Ceratopogonidae) and Related Diptera from Kenya Using Metagenomics and Metabarcoding Analysis.

Authors:  Solomon K Langat; Fredrick Eyase; Wallace Bulimo; Joel Lutomiah; Samuel O Oyola; Mabel Imbuga; Rosemary Sang
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 4.389

3.  Functional morphology of parasitic isopods: understanding morphological adaptations of attachment and feeding structures in Nerocila as a pre-requisite for reconstructing the evolution of Cymothoidae.

Authors:  Christina Nagler; Joachim T Haug
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Association between host species choice and morphological characters of main sensory structures of Culicoides in the Palaeartic region.

Authors:  Denis Augot; Leila Hadj-Henni; Stavana E Strutz; Darine Slama; Christine Millot; Jérôme Depaquit; Jean-Marc Millot
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.