Literature DB >> 24499345

Score associated with the outcome after multiple ablation procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Maciej Wójcik1, Alexander Berkowitsch, Sergey Zaltsberg, Christian W Hamm, Heinz F Pitschner, Malte Kuniss, Thomas Neumann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) is now established therapeutic option. Multiple procedures (MPs) are often needed to achieve the satisfactory outcome. The aim of the study was to assess the outcome after MPs in AF patients categorized to risk-score groups.
METHODS: We followed a cohort of consecutive 911 (69% male; median 59 years) patients with AF (58% paroxysmal) who had CAAF performed. ALARMEC (Atrial fibrillation type, Left Atrium size, Renal insufficiency, MEtabolic syndrome, cardiomyopathy) risk score was calculated for each patient. The end point was maintenance of sinus rhythm at the follow-up of 60 months.
RESULTS: We performed 1,199 CAAF procedures. One, two, and three procedures were performed in 663 (73%), 208 (23%), and 40 (4%) patients, respectively. Outcome after the first procedure (56%) was improved with MPs (76%). MPs > 2 were performed in 1%, 3%, 5%, 6%, and 10% patients with ALARMEC score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. MPs were successful in 89%, 86%, 81%, 65%, and 43% of patients with ALARMEC score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Outcome in 174 (19%) patients on antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) was 85%, 68%, 75%, 44%, and 39% in ALARMEC score: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Outcome in 737 (81%) patients without AAD was 90%, 85%, 80%, 77%, and 69% in ALARMEC score of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The moderate success rate after index procedure of CAAF can be further improved with multiple ones and AAD. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ALARMEC risk score; antiarrhythmic drugs; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; multiple procedures; outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24499345     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical scores used for the prediction of negative events in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Falco Kosich; Katja Schumacher; Tatjana Potpara; Gregory Y Lip; Gerhard Hindricks; Jelena Kornej
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  A novel risk model for very late return of atrial fibrillation beyond 1 year after cryoballoon ablation: the SCALE-CryoAF score.

Authors:  Graham Peigh; Rachel M Kaplan; Aakash Bavishi; Celso L Diaz; Jayson R Baman; Richard Matiasz; Amar Trivedi; Prasongchai Sattayaprasert; Jeremiah Wasserlauf; Mark J Shen; Tatjana S Potpara; Alexandru B Chicos; Rishi Arora; Susan Kim; Albert Lin; Nishant Verma; Bradley P Knight; Rod S Passman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Predicting recurrent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: a systematic review of prognostic models.

Authors:  Janine Dretzke; Naomi Chuchu; Ridhi Agarwal; Clare Herd; Winnie Chua; Larissa Fabritz; Susan Bayliss; Dipak Kotecha; Jonathan J Deeks; Paulus Kirchhof; Yemisi Takwoingi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.