Literature DB >> 24498943

Comparison of allergic reactions to intravenous and intramuscular pegaspargase in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

William C Petersen1, Dana Clark, Stacy L Senn, W Thomas Cash, Scott E Gillespie, Courtney E McCracken, Frank G Keller, Glen Lew.   

Abstract

Pegaspargase (PEG) is a standard component of therapy for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because PEG preparations are bacterially derived, they are highly immunogenic. PEG has traditionally been delivered intramuscularly (IM), but over the last several years, more PEG has been given intravenously (IV) in order to provide a less painful and more convenient means of delivery. However, there are limited data comparing allergic reactions between IV and IM PEG recipients, especially in a large cohort of patients. We reviewed the charts of pediatric ALL patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2011 who received PEG at our institution and compared the incidence, time to onset of symptoms, reaction grade, and hospitalization rate for patients who had allergic reactions to PEG. Of 318 evaluable patients, 159 received IV and 159 received IM PEG. Thirty-one (19.5%) IV patients had an allergic reaction, compared to 17 (10.7%) IM patients (P = .028). Time to onset of symptoms was ≤ 30 minutes for 26 of 27 evaluable IV patients (96.3%) versus only two of 11 evaluable IM patients (18.2%; P < .001). Four of 31 IV patients (12.9%) and six of 17 IM patients (35.5%) required hospitalization (P = .134). There is increased incidence of allergy in patients who received IV PEG compared to IM. Grade of reaction was similar between IV and IM, but allergic reactions to IV PEG had a more rapid onset. While the risk of allergy may be increased, IV delivery appears to have an acceptable safety profile for administration in ALL patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24498943     DOI: 10.3109/08880018.2013.876134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0888-0018            Impact factor:   1.969


  10 in total

1.  Allergic Reactions Associated with Intravenous Versus Intramuscular Pegaspargase: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Authors:  Lesleigh S Abbott; Maria Zakova; Furqan Shaikh; Nisha Shewaramani; Angela Punnett; L Lee Dupuis
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Outcome of pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma with hypersensitivity to pegaspargase treated with PEGylated Erwinia asparaginase, pegcrisantaspase: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Rachel E Rau; ZoAnn Dreyer; Mi Rim Choi; Wei Liang; Roman Skowronski; Krishna P Allamneni; Meenakshi Devidas; Elizabeth A Raetz; Peter C Adamson; Susan M Blaney; Mignon L Loh; Stephen P Hunger
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Premedication Protocols to Prevent Hypersensitivity Reactions to Chemotherapy: a Literature Review.

Authors:  Faisal ALMuhizi; Leticia De Las Vecillas Sanchez; Lucy Gilbert; Ana M Copaescu; Ghislaine A C Isabwe
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 8.667

4.  Oncologist counseling practice and COVID-19 vaccination outcomes for patients with history of PEG-asparaginase hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Sara Zarnegar-Lumley; Cosby A Stone; Christine M Smith; Laura L Hall; Kate E Luck; Grace Koo; Jessica H Plager; Elizabeth J Phillips; Debra L Friedman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.838

5.  Severe pegaspargase hypersensitivity reaction rates (grade ≥3) with intravenous infusion vs. intramuscular injection: analysis of 54,280 doses administered to 16,534 patients on children's oncology group (COG) clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael J Burke; Meenakshi Devidas; Kelly Maloney; Anne Angiolillo; Reuven Schore; Kimberly Dunsmore; Eric Larsen; Len A Mattano; Wanda Salzer; Stuart S Winter; William Carroll; Naomi J Winick; Mignon L Loh; Elizabeth Raetz; Stephen P Hunger; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-11-08

Review 6.  The optimal choice of medication administration route regarding intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous injection.

Authors:  Jing-Fen Jin; Ling-Ling Zhu; Meng Chen; Hui-Min Xu; Hua-Fen Wang; Xiu-Qin Feng; Xiu-Ping Zhu; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Development of Escherichia coli Asparaginase II for Immunosensing: A Trade-Off between Receptor Density and Sensing Efficiency.

Authors:  David M Charbonneau; Alexandra Aubé; Natalie M Rachel; Vanessa Guerrero; Kevin Delorme; Julien Breault-Turcot; Jean-François Masson; Joelle N Pelletier
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2017-05-17

8.  Reduced vs. standard dose native E. coli-asparaginase therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: long-term results of the randomized trial Moscow-Berlin 2002.

Authors:  Alexander Karachunskiy; Gesche Tallen; Julia Roumiantseva; Svetlana Lagoiko; Almira Chervova; Arend von Stackelberg; Olga Aleinikova; Oleg Bydanov; Lyudmila Bajdun; Tatiana Nasedkina; Natalia Korepanova; Sergei Kuznetsov; Galina Novichkova; Marina Goroshkova; Dmitry Litvinov; Natalia Myakova; Natalia Ponomareva; Evgeniya Inyushkina; Konstantin Kondratchik; Julia Abugova; Larisa Fechina; Oleg Arakaev; Alexander Karelin; Vladimir Lebedev; Natalia Judina; Gusel Scharapova; Irina Spichak; Anastasia Shamardina; Olga Ryskal; Alexander Shapochnik; Alexander Rumjanzew; Joachim Boos; Günter Henze
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Asparaginase: an old drug with new questions.

Authors:  Daiane Keller Cecconello; Mariana Rodrigues de Magalhães; Isabel Cristina Ribas Werlang; Maria Lucia de Martino Lee; Mariana Bohns Michalowski; Liane Esteves Daudt
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2019-10-18

10.  Implementation of the asparaginase activity assessment technique for clinical use: experience of a Brazilian Center.

Authors:  Daiane Keller Cecconello; Ciliana Rechenmacher; Isabel Werlang; Priscila Pini Zenatti; Jose Andres Yunes; Ana Paula Alegretti; Claudia Lanvers-Kaminsky; Liane Esteves Daudt; Mariana Bohns Michalowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.