| Literature DB >> 24498357 |
Vinod Shanmughapriya1, Shanmugaraja Meenakshi1, M Hussain Munavar1.
Abstract
Very recently, we have reported about an unconventional mode of elicitation of Mitomycin C (MMC) specific resistance in lexA3 (SOS repair deficient) mutants due to a combination of Rif-Nal mutations (rpoB87-gyrA87). We have clearly shown that UvrB is mandatory for this unconventional MMC resistance in rpoB87-gyrA87-lexA3 strains and uvrB is expressed more even without DNA damage induction from its LexA dependent promoter despite the uncleavable LexA3 repressor. The rpoB87 allele is same as the rpoB3595 which is known to give rise to a fast moving RNA Polymerase and gyrA87 is a hitherto unreported Nal(R) allele. Thus, it is proposed that the RNA Polymerase with higher elongation rate with the mutant DNA Gyrase is able to overcome the repressional hurdle posed by LexA3 to express uvrB. In this study we have systematically analysed the effect of three other rpoB (rif) mutations-two known to give rise to fast moving RNAP (rpoB2 and rpoB111) and one to a slow moving RNAP (rpoB8) and four different alleles of gyrA Nal(R) mutations (gyrA199, gyrA247, gyrA250, gyrA259) isolated spontaneously, on elicitation of MMC resistance in lexA3 strains. Our results indicate that in order to acquire resistance to 0.5 µg/ml MMC cells require both rpoB87 and gyrA87 but resistance to 0.25 µg/ml of MMC can be brought about by either rpoB87, gyrA87, fast moving rpoB mutations or other nal mutations also. We have also depicted increased constitutive uvrB expression in strains carrying fast moving RNAP (rpoB2 and rpoB111) with gyrA87 and another nal mutation with rpoB87 and expression level in these strains is lesser than rpoB87-gyrA87 strain. These results evidently suggest an allele specific role for the rif-nal mutations to acquire MMC resistance in lexA3 strains via increased constitutive uvrB expression and a pivotal role for rpoB87-gyrA87 combination to elicit higher levels of resistance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24498357 PMCID: PMC3912069 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
List of E. coli K12 strains used in this study, their relevant Genotype and source.
| Strain | Relevant Genotype | Source/Reference/Construction |
| AB1157 | F–
| Laboratory collection |
| DM49 | Same as AB1157 but | M.K. Berlyn, CGSC, USA |
| DM49N | Same as DM49 but | Shanmughapriya and Munavar, 2012 |
| DM49R | Same as DM49 but | Shanmughapriya and Munavar, 2012 |
| DM49RN | Same as DM49N but | Shanmughapriya and Munavar, 2012 |
| MMR1 | F–Δ | Meenakshi and Munavar (Manuscript under preparation) |
| HR318 | F-, | Dr. Harinarayanan, CDFD, India# |
| NAM1 | F-, | Agarwal, Shanmughapriya and Munavar (Unpublished work) |
| DM49R2N | Same as DM49N but | This study, DM49N X P1/(MMR1) |
| DM49R8N | Same as DM49N but | This study, DM49N X P1/(HR318) |
| DM49R111N | Same as DM49N but | This study, DM49N X P1/(NAM1) |
| DM49RN3 | Same as DM49R but | This study |
| DM49RN4 | Same as DM49R but | This study |
| DM49RN7 | Same as DM49R but | This study |
| DM49RN9 | Same as DM49R but | This study |
| DM49R2 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(MMR1) |
| DM49R8 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(HR318) |
| DM49R111 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(NAM1) |
| DM49N3 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(DM49RN3) |
| DM49N4 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(DM49RN4) |
| DM49N7 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(DM49RN7) |
| DM49N9 | Same as DM49 but | This study, DM49 X P1/(DM49RN9) |
| JW0762-2 | F | M.K. Berlyn, CGSC, USA |
| 49RNUB | Same as DM49RN but Δ | Shanmughapriya and Munavar, 2012 |
| 49R2NUB | Same as DM49R2N but Δ | This study, DM49R2N X P1/(49RNUB) |
| 49R8NUB | Same as DM49R8N but Δ | This study, DM49R8N X P1/(49RNUB) |
| 49R111NUB | Same as DM49R111N but Δ | This study, DM49R111N X P1/(49RNUB) |
| 49RN3UB | Same as DM49RN3 but Δ | This study, DM49RN3 X P1/(49RNUB) |
| 49RN4UB | Same as DM49RN4 but Δ | This study, DM49RN4 X P1/(49RNUB) |
| 49RN7UB | Same as DM49RN7 but Δ | This study, DM49RN7 X P1/(49RNUB) |
| 49RN9UB | Same as DM49RN9 but Δ | This study, DM49RN9 X P1/(49RNUB) |
| JW0429-1 | F –, | M.K. Berlyn, CGSC, USA |
| SM49LK | Same as DM49RN but Δ | This study, DM49RN X P1/(JW0429-1) |
| SMM57LK | Same as AB1157 but Δ | This study, AB1157 X P1/(SM49LK) |
| SMM49LK | Same as DM49 but Δ | This study, DM49 X P1/(SM49LK) |
| SMM2LK | Same as DM49R2N but Δ | This study, DM49R2N X P1/(SM49LK) |
| SMM8LK | Same as DM49R8N but Δ | This study, DM49R8N X P1/(SM49LK) |
| SMM111LK | Same as DM49R111N but Δ | This study, DM49R111N X P1/(SM49LK) |
| SMM3LK | Same as DM49RN3 but Δ | This study, DM49RN3 X P1/(SM49LK) |
CGSC -Coli Genetic Stock Centre, USA.
# CDFD – Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics.
rpoB alleles used in this study and their relevant characteristics.
|
| Base pair change/Codonor amino acid change | Type of RNAPproduced | Relative Termination read through | Source/Comments | |
| Rho independent terminators | Rho dependent terminators | ||||
|
| C1565 →T1565/TCT→TTT(S522F) | Fast moving | 2.5–3.5 | 2–2.7 | Kumaresan and Jayaraman, 1988, Shanmughapriya and Munavar, 2012, Jin and Gross, 1988 |
|
| C1576 →T1576/CAC→TAC(H526Y) | Fast moving | 1.3–3.3 | 1.1–1.6 | Meenakshi and Munavar, Unpublished data |
|
| A1538→C1538/CAG→CCG(Q513P) | Slow moving | 0.3–0.6 | 0.4–0.8 | R. Harinarayanan, CDFD, Hyderabad, India |
|
| C1692→T1692/CCT→CTT(P564L) | Fast moving | 1.5–2.5 | 1.1–1.4 | This study |
Values given as fold increase in termination read through are from Jin et al, 1988.
Figure 1Sequential spotting test for analyses of survival of various Rif-Nal strains on LB plates containing 0.5 µg/ml of MMC after ∼24 hours incubation.
Appropriate control strains (AB1157 for positive control and DM49 for Negative control) were also tested. The growth of the respective strains on LB plates without MMC after ∼12–14 hours incubation is given on the right.
Figure 2Survival of different rif-nal strains on MMC plates.
a. % survival of relevant gyrA87-RifR strains on LB plates containing 0.5 µg/ml of MMC. b. % survival of relevant rpoB87-NalR strains on LB plates containing 0.5 µg/ml of MMC. The values plotted are the average of three independent set of experiments. The standard error values are given as error bars. The % survival values were calculated as (cfu per ml in LB with MMC plates/cfu per ml in LB plates w/o MMC) X100.
Sequence changes in various gyrA alleles used in the study.
|
| Base pair change/Codon and amino acid change | Source/comments |
|
| G244→A244/GAC→AAC (D82N) | Kumaresan and Jayaraman, 1988, Shanmughapriya and Munavar, 2012 |
|
| G199→T199/GCC→TCC (A67S) | Isolated and sequenced in this study |
|
| G250→T250/GCG→TCG (A84S) | Isolated and sequenced in this study |
|
| G259→A259/GAC→AAC (D87N) | Isolated and Sequenced in this study |
|
| T247→G247/TCG→GCG (S83A) | Isolated and Sequenced in this study |
Figure 3Sequential spotting test for analyses of survival of various Rif-Nal strains on LB plates containing 0.25 µg/ml of MMC after ∼24 hours incubation.
Appropriate control strains (AB1157 for positive control and DM49 for Negative control were also tested). The growth of the respective strains on LB plates without MMC after ∼12–14 hours incubation is given on the right.
Level of MMC survival in relevant strains and its implications.
| Strain | Relevant Genotype | MMC survival at0.5 µg/ml/(R/S) | MMC survival at0.25 µg/ml/(R/S) | Possible explanation/Reasons/comments |
| AB1157 |
| R (+++) | R (+++) | Completely resistant toDNA damaging agents being |
| DM49 |
| S (−) | S (−) | Sensitive to all DNA damagingagents being |
| DM49RN |
| R (++) | R (++) | Selective suppression of onlyMitomycin C sensitive phenotype of |
| DM49R |
| S (−) | R(++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49N |
| S (−) | R(++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49R2N |
| S (−) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49R8N |
| S (–) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49R111N |
| S (−) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49RN3 |
| S (−) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49RN4 |
| S (−) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49RN7 |
| S (−) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| DM49RN9 |
| S (−) | R (++) | Reduced SIR effect due to only |
| 49RNUB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistancedue to loss of |
| 49R2NUB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistance dueto loss of |
| 49R8NUB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistance dueto loss of |
| 49R111NUB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistancedue to loss of |
| 49RN3UB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistancedue to loss of |
| 49RN4UB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistance due to loss of |
| 49RN7UB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistancedue to loss of |
| 49RN9UB |
| S (–) | S (–) | Complete loss of MMC resistancedue to loss of |
R (+++) – ∼100% survival.
R (++) – ∼1% survival.
S (−) – ∼0.01–0.001% survival.
S (–) – ∼ 0.0001–0.00001% survival.
S (–) – Complete loss of survival.
Figure 4RT-PCR based analysis of expression of uvrB in indicated strains along with DNA control as positive reaction and RNA control as negative reaction.
Figure 5Extent of filamentation in MMC untreated and 0.5 µg/ml MMC treated samples of indicated strains as observed under light microscope.
Relevant genotypes of the strains are mentioned wherever appropriate.