| Literature DB >> 24498051 |
Luciano de Andrade1, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci2, Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues3, Karen Finato4, Elias Carvalho5, Ricardo Pietrobon6, Eniuce Menezes de Souza7, Oscar Kenji Nihei4, Catherine Lynch8, Maria Dalva de Barros Carvalho7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Road traffic injuries (RTI) are a major public health epidemic killing thousands of people daily. Low and middle-income countries, such as Brazil, have the highest annual rates of road traffic fatalities. In order to improve road safety, this study mapped road traffic fatalities on a Brazilian highway to determine the main environmental factors affecting road traffic fatalities. METHODS AND <br> FINDINGS: Four techniques were utilized to identify and analyze RTI hotspots. We used spatial analysis by points by applying kernel density estimator, and wavelet analysis to identify the main hot regions. Additionally, built environment analysis, and principal component analysis were conducted to verify patterns contributing to crash occurrence in the hotspots. Between 2007 and 2009, 379 crashes were notified, with 466 fatalities on BR277. Higher incidence of crashes occurred on sections of highway with double lanes (ratio 2∶1). The hotspot analysis demonstrated that both the eastern and western regions had higher incidences of crashes when compared to the central region. Through the built environment analysis, we have identified five different patterns, demonstrating that specific environmental characteristics are associated with different types of fatal crashes. Patterns 2 and 4 are constituted mainly by predominantly urban characteristics and have frequent fatal pedestrian crashes. Patterns 1, 3 and 5 display mainly rural characteristics and have higher prevalence of vehicular collisions. In the built environment analysis, the variables length of road in urban area, limited lighting, double lanes roadways, and less auxiliary lanes were associated with a higher incidence of fatal crashes. <br> CONCLUSIONS: By combining different techniques of analyses, we have identified numerous hotspots and environmental characteristics, which governmental or regulatory agencies could make use to plan strategies to reduce RTI and support life-saving policies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24498051 PMCID: PMC3907522 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1BR-277 Federal Highway, State of Parana, Brazil.
Sources: Institute of Land and Cartography Geosciences website, 2010 [17] and Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, 2010 [18].
Figure 2Heatmap - Number of fatalities by crash types in each region on highway BR-277.
Figure 3Kernel density and wavelet analysis hotspots.
3A) All Fatal Crashes. 3B) Fatal Pedestrian Crashes. 3C) Fatal Vehicular Crashes.
Built environment variables evaluated for the entire route of BR 277.
| Environment variables | Pedestrian (Mean (SD) or N (%)) | Vehicles (Mean (SD) or N (%)) | |||
| High Risk | Low Risk | High Risk | Low Risk | ||
| Length of road in UA (Km) | 5.00 (3.71) | 0.00** | 2.40 (3.56) | 0.00** | |
| Intersections (rate by Km) | 0.36 (0.30) | 0.23 (0.27)** | 0.40 (0.40) | 0.20 (0.23)** | |
| Curves (rate by Km) | 0.16 (0.24) | 0.39 (0.30)** | 0.19 (0.29) | 0.43 (0.28)** | |
| Slopes | No | 8 (73) | 35 (71) | 22 (76) | 21 (68) |
| Yes | 3 (27) | 14 (29) | 7 (24) | 10 (32) | |
| Traffic lights | No | 9 (82) | 48 (98) | 27 (93) | 30 (97) |
| Yes | 2 (18) | 1 (2)* | 2 (7) | 1 (3) | |
| Police stations | No | 7 (64) | 39 (80) | 22 (76) | 24 (77) |
| Yes | 4 (36) | 10 (20) | 7 (24) | 7 (23) | |
| Bus stops | No | 4 (36) | 33 (67) | 16 (55) | 21 (68) |
| Yes | 7 (64) | 16 (33) | 13 (45) | 10 (32) | |
| Side Unevenness | No | 9 (82) | 45 (92) | 25 (86) | 29 (93) |
| Yes | 2 (18) | 4 (8) | 4 (14) | 2 (7) | |
| Speedbumps | No | 8 (73) | 43 (88) | 25 (86) | 26 (84) |
| Yes | 3 (27) | 6 (12) | 4 (14) | 5 (16) | |
| Lighting | No | 4 (36) | 36 (73) | 17 (59) | 23 (74) |
| Yes | 7 (64) | 13 (27)** | 12 (41) | 8 (26) | |
| Speed limit | <80 | 6 (54) | 17 (35) | 14 (48) | 9 (29) |
| 110 | 5 (46) | 32 (65) | 15 (52) | 22 (71) | |
| Footbridge | Yes | 7 (64) | 41 (84) | 25 (86) | 23 (74) |
| No | 4 (36) | 8 (16) | 4 (14) | 8 (26) | |
| Number of Lanes | D | 9 (82) | 9 (18) | 12 (41) | 6 (19) |
| S | 2 (18) | 40 (82)* | 17 (59) | 25 (81) | |
| Auxiliary Lanes | No | 10 (91) | 26 (53) | 23 (79) | 13 (42) |
| Yes | 1 (9) | 23 (47)** | 6 (21) | 18 (58)* | |
| Central Unevenness | No | 8 (73) | 44 (90) | 24 (83) | 28 (90) |
| Yes | 3 (27) | 5 (10) | 5 (17) | 3 (10) | |
SD: standard deviation; *P<0.05; **P<0.01; D = Double Lanes; S = Single Lane; UA = Urban Area.
Figure 4Built environment components’ impact on fatal crashes divided into Pedestrian Injuries (Model 1), Vehicular Collisions (Model 2) and Loss of control of the vehicle (Model 3).
Figure 5Geographic distribution and characteristics of the five built environmental patterns according to categories with the sectors of high and low risk of fatal crashes.