Lisa S Cossy1, Linda T Miller2. 1. Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. 2. School of Occupational Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescents admitted to youth custody facilities are often in need of physical and mental health care. OBJECTIVES: To describe primary health care practices in Ontario's youth custody facilities. METHOD: A questionnaire regarding facility characteristics and primary health care practices was distributed to the directors of all youth custody facilities in Ontario. RESULTS: Most (87.8%) facilities obtained medical histories after the youth arrived, and 92% used health care professionals to perform that assessment. Intake medical examinations were performed on each youth admitted to custody at 94% of all facilities; however, only 57.2% of facilities reported that these examinations were performed by a doctor within 72 h of admission. Performing suicide assessments on all youth at intake was reported by 77.6% of facilities. Continuous health education was provided by 76% of facilities. Facility type and type of management appear to be related to some areas of health services provision. CONCLUSIONS: Youth custody facilities in Ontario are providing primary health care services. Weaknesses are, however, evident, particularly in relation to untimely intake medical examinations, failure to provide continuous health education and failure to conduct suicide assessments on all youth at intake. Future research on barriers to health service provision in Canadian youth custody facilities is recommended.
BACKGROUND: Adolescents admitted to youth custody facilities are often in need of physical and mental health care. OBJECTIVES: To describe primary health care practices in Ontario's youth custody facilities. METHOD: A questionnaire regarding facility characteristics and primary health care practices was distributed to the directors of all youth custody facilities in Ontario. RESULTS: Most (87.8%) facilities obtained medical histories after the youth arrived, and 92% used health care professionals to perform that assessment. Intake medical examinations were performed on each youth admitted to custody at 94% of all facilities; however, only 57.2% of facilities reported that these examinations were performed by a doctor within 72 h of admission. Performing suicide assessments on all youth at intake was reported by 77.6% of facilities. Continuous health education was provided by 76% of facilities. Facility type and type of management appear to be related to some areas of health services provision. CONCLUSIONS: Youth custody facilities in Ontario are providing primary health care services. Weaknesses are, however, evident, particularly in relation to untimely intake medical examinations, failure to provide continuous health education and failure to conduct suicide assessments on all youth at intake. Future research on barriers to health service provision in Canadian youth custody facilities is recommended.
Keywords:
Custody facilities; Health care; Health practices; Youth custody
Authors: Angela A Robertson; Angela R Robertson; Janet St Lawrence; David T Morse; Connie Baird-Thomas; Hui Liew; Kathleen Gresham Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2011-03-10
Authors: Karen M Abram; Jeanne Y Choe; Jason J Washburn; Linda A Teplin; Devon C King; Mina K Dulcan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Steven Belenko; Richard Dembo; Matthew Rollie; Kristina Childs; Christopher Salvatore Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 9.308