BACKGROUND: Tobacco assessment and cessation support are not routinely included in cancer care. An automated tobacco assessment and cessation program was developed to increase the delivery of tobacco cessation support for cancer patients. METHODS: A structured tobacco assessment was incorporated into the electronic health record at Roswell Park Cancer Institute to identify tobacco use in cancer patients at diagnosis and during follow-up. All patients who reported tobacco use within the past 30 days were automatically referred to a dedicated cessation program that provided cessation counseling. Data were analyzed for referral accuracy and interest in cessation support. RESULTS: Between October 2010 and December 2012, 11,868 patients were screened for tobacco use, and 2765 were identified as tobacco users and were referred to the cessation service. In referred patients, 1381 of those patients received only a mailed invitation to contact the cessation service, and 1384 received a mailing as well as telephone contact attempts from the cessation service. In the 1126 (81.4%) patients contacted by telephone, 51 (4.5%) reported no tobacco use within the past 30 days, 35 (3.1%) were medically unable to participate, and 30 (2.7%) declined participation. Of the 1381 patients who received only a mailed invitation, 16 (1.2%) contacted the cessation program for assistance. Three questions at initial consult and follow-up generated over 98% of referrals. Tobacco assessment frequency every 4 weeks delayed referral in < 1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: An automated electronic health record-based tobacco assessment and cessation referral program can identify substantial numbers of smokers who are receptive to enrollment in a cessation support service.
BACKGROUND:Tobacco assessment and cessation support are not routinely included in cancer care. An automated tobacco assessment and cessation program was developed to increase the delivery of tobacco cessation support for cancerpatients. METHODS: A structured tobacco assessment was incorporated into the electronic health record at Roswell Park Cancer Institute to identify tobacco use in cancerpatients at diagnosis and during follow-up. All patients who reported tobacco use within the past 30 days were automatically referred to a dedicated cessation program that provided cessation counseling. Data were analyzed for referral accuracy and interest in cessation support. RESULTS: Between October 2010 and December 2012, 11,868 patients were screened for tobacco use, and 2765 were identified as tobacco users and were referred to the cessation service. In referred patients, 1381 of those patients received only a mailed invitation to contact the cessation service, and 1384 received a mailing as well as telephone contact attempts from the cessation service. In the 1126 (81.4%) patients contacted by telephone, 51 (4.5%) reported no tobacco use within the past 30 days, 35 (3.1%) were medically unable to participate, and 30 (2.7%) declined participation. Of the 1381 patients who received only a mailed invitation, 16 (1.2%) contacted the cessation program for assistance. Three questions at initial consult and follow-up generated over 98% of referrals. Tobacco assessment frequency every 4 weeks delayed referral in < 1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: An automated electronic health record-based tobacco assessment and cessation referral program can identify substantial numbers of smokers who are receptive to enrollment in a cessation support service.
Authors: Csaba Gajdos; Mary T Hawn; Elizabeth J Campagna; William G Henderson; Jasvinder A Singh; Thomas Houston Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Kasisomayajula Viswanath; Roy S Herbst; Stephanie R Land; Scott J Leischow; Peter G Shields Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Graham W Warren; James R Marshall; K Michael Cummings; Benjamin Toll; Ellen R Gritz; Alan Hutson; Seyedeh Dibaj; Roy Herbst; Carolyn Dresler Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Jennifer Irvin Vidrine; Sanjay Shete; Yumei Cao; Anthony Greisinger; Penny Harmonson; Barry Sharp; Lyndsay Miles; Susan M Zbikowski; David W Wetter Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: David P Mason; Sreekumar Subramanian; Edward R Nowicki; Joshua D Grab; Sudish C Murthy; Thomas W Rice; Eugene H Blackstone Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Luigino Dal Maso; Antonella Zucchetto; Renato Talamini; Diego Serraino; Carmen F Stocco; Marina Vercelli; Fabio Falcini; Silvia Franceschi Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Lisa M Fucito; Sharon Czabafy; Peter S Hendricks; Chris Kotsen; Donna Richardson; Benjamin A Toll Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Katharine A Amato; Mary E Reid; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Gary A Giovino; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Graham W Warren; Martin C Mahoney; Andrew J Hyland Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2018 Sep/Oct
Authors: Katharine A Dobson Amato; Andrew Hyland; Robert Reed; Martin C Mahoney; James Marshall; Gary Giovino; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Michael A Zevon; K Michael Cummings; Chukwumere Nwogu; Anurag K Singh; Hongbin Chen; Graham W Warren; Mary Reid Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Alana M Rojewski; Stephen Baldassarri; Nina A Cooperman; Ellen R Gritz; Frank T Leone; Megan E Piper; Benjamin A Toll; Graham W Warren Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-01-17 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Alexis J Platek; Vijayvel Jayaprakash; Mihai Merzianu; Mary E Platek; David M Cohan; Wesley L Hicks; Sathiya P Marimuthu; Timothy B Winslow; Vishal Gupta; Hassan Arshad; Moni A Kuriakose; Shiva Dibaj; James R Marshall; Mary E Reid; Graham W Warren; Anurag K Singh Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2016-06-27 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Seung Hee Choi; Jeffrey E Terrell; Carol R Bradford; Tamer Ghanem; Matthew E Spector; Gregory T Wolf; Isaac M Lipkus; Sonia A Duffy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 4.244