Michael R Fettiplace1, Belinda S Akpa, Richard Ripper, Brian Zider, Jason Lang, Israel Rubinstein, Guy Weinberg. 1. From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (M.R.F., R.R., and G.W.); Research and Development Service, Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (M.R.F., R.R., I.R., and G.W.); University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (M.R.F. and B.Z.); Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (B.S.A.); University of Illinois College of Medicine, Peoria, Illinois (J.L.); and Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (I.R.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent publications have questioned the validity of the "lipid sink" theory of lipid resuscitation while others have identified sink-independent effects and posed alternative mechanisms such as hemodilution. To address these issues, the authors tested the dose-dependent response to intravenous lipid emulsion during reversal of bupivacaine-induced cardiovascular toxicity in vivo. Subsequently, the authors modeled the relative contribution of volume resuscitation, drug sequestration, inotropy and combined drug sequestration, and inotropy to this response with the use of an in silico model. METHODS: Rats were surgically prepared to monitor cardiovascular metrics and deliver drugs. After catheterization and instrumentation, animals received a nonlethal dose of bupivacaine to produce transient cardiovascular toxicity, then were randomized to receive one of the four treatments: 30% intravenous lipid emulsion, 20% intravenous lipid emulsion, intravenous saline, or no treatment (n = 7 per condition; 28 total animals). Recovery responses were compared with the predictions of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model parameterized using previously published laboratory data. RESULTS: Rats treated with lipid emulsions recovered faster than did rats treated with saline or no treatment. Intravenous lipid emulsion of 30% elicited the fastest hemodynamic recovery followed in order by 20% intravenous lipid emulsion, saline, and no treatment. An increase in arterial blood pressure underlay the recovery in both lipid emulsion-treated groups. Heart rates remained depressed in all four groups throughout the observation period. Model predictions mirrored the experimental recovery, and the model that combined volume, sequestration, and inotropy predicted in vivo results most accurately. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lipid emulsion accelerates cardiovascular recovery from bupivacaine toxicity in a dose-dependent manner, which is driven by a cardiotonic response that complements the previously reported sequestration effect.
BACKGROUND: Recent publications have questioned the validity of the "lipid sink" theory of lipid resuscitation while others have identified sink-independent effects and posed alternative mechanisms such as hemodilution. To address these issues, the authors tested the dose-dependent response to intravenous lipid emulsion during reversal of bupivacaine-induced cardiovascular toxicity in vivo. Subsequently, the authors modeled the relative contribution of volume resuscitation, drug sequestration, inotropy and combined drug sequestration, and inotropy to this response with the use of an in silico model. METHODS:Rats were surgically prepared to monitor cardiovascular metrics and deliver drugs. After catheterization and instrumentation, animals received a nonlethal dose of bupivacaine to produce transient cardiovascular toxicity, then were randomized to receive one of the four treatments: 30% intravenous lipid emulsion, 20% intravenous lipid emulsion, intravenous saline, or no treatment (n = 7 per condition; 28 total animals). Recovery responses were compared with the predictions of a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model parameterized using previously published laboratory data. RESULTS:Rats treated with lipid emulsions recovered faster than did rats treated with saline or no treatment. Intravenous lipid emulsion of 30% elicited the fastest hemodynamic recovery followed in order by 20% intravenous lipid emulsion, saline, and no treatment. An increase in arterial blood pressure underlay the recovery in both lipid emulsion-treated groups. Heart rates remained depressed in all four groups throughout the observation period. Model predictions mirrored the experimental recovery, and the model that combined volume, sequestration, and inotropy predicted in vivo results most accurately. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lipid emulsion accelerates cardiovascular recovery from bupivacainetoxicity in a dose-dependent manner, which is driven by a cardiotonic response that complements the previously reported sequestration effect.
Authors: A P Robin; J Nordenström; J Askanazi; D H Elwyn; Y A Carpentier; J M Kinney Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 1980 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: J J Eledjam; J E de La Coussaye; J Brugada; B Bassoul; J P Gagnol; J R Fabregat; C Massé; A Sassine Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 1989-12 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: David B Hiller; Guido Di Gregorio; Richard Ripper; Kemba Kelly; Malek Massad; Lucas Edelman; Guy Edelman; Douglas L Feinstein; Guy L Weinberg Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Guy L Weinberg; Guido Di Gregorio; Richard Ripper; Kemba Kelly; Malek Massad; Lucas Edelman; David Schwartz; Nirali Shah; Sophie Zheng; Douglas L Feinstein Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Michael R Fettiplace; Adrian Pichurko; Richard Ripper; Bocheng Lin; Katarzyna Kowal; Kinga Lis; David Schwartz; Douglas L Feinstein; Israel Rubinstein; Guy Weinberg Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jing Li; Michael Fettiplace; Sy-Jou Chen; Benjamin Steinhorn; Zuohui Shao; Xiangdong Zhu; Changqing Li; Shaun Harty; Guy Weinberg; Terry L Vanden Hoek Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Michael R Fettiplace; Kinga Lis; Richard Ripper; Katarzyna Kowal; Adrian Pichurko; Dominic Vitello; Israel Rubinstein; David Schwartz; Belinda S Akpa; Guy Weinberg Journal: J Control Release Date: 2014-12-04 Impact factor: 9.776
Authors: Michael R Fettiplace; Katarzyna Kowal; Richard Ripper; Alexandria Young; Kinga Lis; Israel Rubinstein; Marcelo Bonini; Richard Minshall; Guy Weinberg Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 7.892