Literature DB >> 24495809

Specificity of stimulus-evoked fMRI responses in the mouse: the influence of systemic physiological changes associated with innocuous stimulation under four different anesthetics.

Aileen Schroeter1, Felix Schlegel1, Aline Seuwen2, Joanes Grandjean1, Markus Rudin3.   

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance (fMRI) in mice has become an attractive tool for mechanistic studies, for characterizing models of human disease, and for evaluation of novel therapies. Yet, controlling the physiological state of mice is challenging, but nevertheless important as changes in cardiovascular parameters might affect the hemodynamic readout which constitutes the basics of the fMRI signal. In contrast to rats, fMRI studies in mice report less robust brain activation of rather widespread character to innocuous sensory stimulation. Anesthesia is known to influence the characteristics of the fMRI signal. To evaluate modulatory effects imposed by the anesthesia on stimulus-evoked fMRI responses, we compared blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) signal changes to electrical hindpaw stimulation using the four commonly used anesthetics isoflurane, medetomidine, propofol and urethane. fMRI measurements were complemented by assessing systemic physiological parameters throughout the experiment. Unilateral stimulation of the hindpaw elicited widespread fMRI responses in the mouse brain displaying a bilateral pattern irrespective of the anesthetic used. Analysis of magnitude and temporal profile of BOLD and CBV signals indicated anesthesia-specific modulation of cerebral hemodynamic responses and differences observed for the four anesthetics could be largely explained by their known effects on animal physiology. Strikingly, independent of the anesthetic used our results reveal that fMRI responses are influenced by stimulus-induced cardiovascular changes, which indicate an arousal response, even to innocuous stimulation. This may mask specific fMRI signal associated to the stimulus. Hence, studying the processing of peripheral input in mice using fMRI techniques constitutes a major challenge and adapted paradigms and/or alternative fMRI readouts should also be considered when studying sensory processing in mice.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Arousal; Mouse; Stimulation; Systemic physiological parameters; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24495809     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  41 in total

1.  Optogenetic fMRI in the mouse hippocampus: Hemodynamic response to brief glutamatergic stimuli.

Authors:  Philipp Lebhardt; Christian Clemm von Hohenberg; Wolfgang Weber-Fahr; Wolfgang Kelsch; Alexander Sartorius
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Noise and non-neuronal contributions to the BOLD signal: applications to and insights from animal studies.

Authors:  Shella D Keilholz; Wen-Ju Pan; Jacob Billings; Maysam Nezafati; Sadia Shakil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Standardization of Small Animal Imaging-Current Status and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Julia G Mannheim; Firat Kara; Janine Doorduin; Kerstin Fuchs; Gerald Reischl; Sayuan Liang; Marleen Verhoye; Felix Gremse; Laura Mezzanotte; Marc C Huisman
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Fiber-optic implant for simultaneous fluorescence-based calcium recordings and BOLD fMRI in mice.

Authors:  Felix Schlegel; Yaroslav Sych; Aileen Schroeter; Jillian Stobart; Bruno Weber; Fritjof Helmchen; Markus Rudin
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Contributions of structural connectivity and cerebrovascular parameters to functional magnetic resonance imaging signals in mice at rest and during sensory paw stimulation.

Authors:  Aileen Schroeter; Joanes Grandjean; Felix Schlegel; Bechara J Saab; Markus Rudin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Comparison of fMRI analysis methods for heterogeneous BOLD responses in block design studies.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Ben A Duffy; David Bernal-Casas; Zhongnan Fang; Jin Hyung Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Orientation selective deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in rats.

Authors:  Lauri J Lehto; Antonietta Canna; Lin Wu; Alejandra Sierra; Ekaterina Zhurakovskaya; Jun Ma; Clairice Pearce; Maple Shaio; Pavel Filip; Matthew D Johnson; Walter C Low; Olli Gröhn; Heikki Tanila; Silvia Mangia; Shalom Michaeli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Dynamic resting state fMRI analysis in mice reveals a set of Quasi-Periodic Patterns and illustrates their relationship with the global signal.

Authors:  Michaël E Belloy; Maarten Naeyaert; Anzar Abbas; Disha Shah; Verdi Vanreusel; Johan van Audekerke; Shella D Keilholz; Georgios A Keliris; Annemie Van der Linden; Marleen Verhoye
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Characterization of brain-wide somatosensory BOLD fMRI in mice under dexmedetomidine/isoflurane and ketamine/xylazine.

Authors:  Taeyi You; Geun Ho Im; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy brain imaging system for small animals in mobile conditions.

Authors:  Seung-Ho Paik; Seung Hyun Lee; Ju-Hee Kim; Shin-Young Kang; Zephaniah Phillips V; Youngwoon Choi; Beop-Min Kim
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.