Jennifer Moye1, Andrea June2, Lindsey Ann Martin3, Jeffrey Gosian4, Levi I Herman3, Aanand D Naik3. 1. VA Boston Health Care System, USA; Harvard Medical School, USA. Electronic address: jennifer.moye@va.gov. 2. Central Connecticut State University, USA. 3. Health Services Research and Development, Michael E. DeBakey VAMC, Houston, TX, USA; Baylor College of Medicine, USA. 4. VA Boston Health Care System, USA; Harvard Medical School, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Institute of Medicine documents a significant gap in care for long term side effects of cancer treatment, including pain. This paper characterizes age differences in the prevalence and predictive characteristics of pain to guide clinicians in identification and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 170 adults with head and neck, esophageal, gastric, or colorectal cancers were recruited from two regional Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Face to face interviews were conducted 6, 12, and 18 months after diagnosis with the PROMIS scale to assess pain and PHQ-9 scale to assess depression. Descriptive statistics characterized incidence and prevalence of pain impact and intensity ratings. Multivariate linear hierarchical regression identified clinical characteristics associated with pain in older versus younger age groups. RESULTS: Clinically significant pain was endorsed in one third (32%) of the sample, with younger adults reporting higher levels of the impact of pain on daily activities and work, and also higher pain intensity ratings than older adults. In younger adults, pain ratings were most associated with lower social support and higher depression, as well as advanced cancer stage. In older adults, pain was multifactorial, associated with baseline comorbidities, adjuvant treatment, and both combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is a significant persisting problem for one in three cancer survivors, requiring ongoing assessment, even months later. Important differences in pain's determinants and impact are present by age group. Identification and treatment of pain, as well as associated conditions such as depression, may improve the quality of life in cancer survivors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: The Institute of Medicine documents a significant gap in care for long term side effects of cancer treatment, including pain. This paper characterizes age differences in the prevalence and predictive characteristics of pain to guide clinicians in identification and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 170 adults with head and neck, esophageal, gastric, or colorectal cancers were recruited from two regional Veterans Administration Medical Centers. Face to face interviews were conducted 6, 12, and 18 months after diagnosis with the PROMIS scale to assess pain and PHQ-9 scale to assess depression. Descriptive statistics characterized incidence and prevalence of pain impact and intensity ratings. Multivariate linear hierarchical regression identified clinical characteristics associated with pain in older versus younger age groups. RESULTS: Clinically significant pain was endorsed in one third (32%) of the sample, with younger adults reporting higher levels of the impact of pain on daily activities and work, and also higher pain intensity ratings than older adults. In younger adults, pain ratings were most associated with lower social support and higher depression, as well as advanced cancer stage. In older adults, pain was multifactorial, associated with baseline comorbidities, adjuvant treatment, and both combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. CONCLUSIONS:Pain is a significant persisting problem for one in three cancer survivors, requiring ongoing assessment, even months later. Important differences in pain's determinants and impact are present by age group. Identification and treatment of pain, as well as associated conditions such as depression, may improve the quality of life in cancer survivors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors: M H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen; J M de Rijke; A G Kessels; H C Schouten; M van Kleef; J Patijn Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: R Bernabei; G Gambassi; K Lapane; F Landi; C Gatsonis; R Dunlop; L Lipsitz; K Steel; V Mor Journal: JAMA Date: 1998-06-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Rosalie A Carr; Alexandra M Roch; Xin Zhong; Eugene P Ceppa; Nicholas J Zyromski; Attila Nakeeb; C Max Schmidt; Michael G House Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kelly Kenzik; Maria Pisu; Shelley A Johns; Tamara Baker; Robert A Oster; Elizabeth Kvale; Mona N Fouad; Michelle Y Martin Journal: Pain Med Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Thi Xuan Mai Tran; Jungeun Park; Joonki Lee; Yuh-Seog Jung; Yoonjung Chang; Hyunsoon Cho Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 3.603