Literature DB >> 24495695

Evaluating the physiological reserves of older patients with cancer: the value of potential biomarkers of aging?

Athanasios G Pallis1, Sigrid Hatse2, Barbara Brouwers2, Graham Pawelec3, Claire Falandry4, Ulrich Wedding5, Lissandra Dal Lago6, Lazzaro Repetto7, Alistair Ring8, Hans Wildiers9.   

Abstract

Aging of an individual entails a progressive decline of functional reserves and loss of homeostasis that eventually lead to mortality. This process is highly individualized and is influenced by multiple genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors. This individualization and the diversity of factors influencing aging result in a significant heterogeneity among people with the same chronological age, representing a major challenge in daily oncology practice. Thus, many factors other than mere chronological age will contribute to treatment tolerance and outcome in the older patients with cancer. Clinical/comprehensive geriatric assessment can provide information on the general health status of individuals, but is far from perfect as a prognostic/predictive tool for individual patients. On the other hand, aging can also be assessed in terms of biological changes in certain tissues like the blood compartment which result from adaptive alterations due to past history of exposures, as well as intrinsic aging processes. There are major signs of 'aging' in lymphocytes (e.g. lymphocyte subset distribution, telomere length, p16INK4A expression), and also in (inflammatory) cytokine expression and gene expression patterns. These result from a combination of the above two processes, overlaying genetic predispositions which contribute significantly to the aging phenotype. These potential "aging biomarkers" might provide additional prognostic/predictive information supplementing clinical evaluation. The purpose of the current paper is to describe the most relevant potential "aging biomarkers" (markers that indicate the biological functional age of patients) which focus on the biological background, the (limited) available clinical data, and technical challenges. Despite their great potential interest, there is a need for much more (validated) clinical data before these biomarkers could be used in a routine clinical setting. This manuscript tries to provide a guideline on how these markers can be integrated in future research aimed at providing such data.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Aging genes; CRAMP; Cancer; Chitinase; Elderly; IGF-1; IL-6; Immunosenescence; Inflammaging; MCP-1; RANTES; SASP; Telomeres

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24495695     DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2013.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol        ISSN: 1879-4068            Impact factor:   3.599


  31 in total

Review 1.  The biology of aging and lymphoma: a complex interplay.

Authors:  Clémentine Sarkozy; Gilles Salles; Claire Falandry
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Incorporating biomarkers into cancer and aging research.

Authors:  Joleen M Hubbard; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Three-dimensional human facial morphologies as robust aging markers.

Authors:  Weiyang Chen; Wei Qian; Gang Wu; Weizhong Chen; Bo Xian; Xingwei Chen; Yaqiang Cao; Christopher D Green; Fanghong Zhao; Kun Tang; Jing-Dong J Han
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  An Association of Cancer Physicians' strategy for improving services and outcomes for cancer patients.

Authors:  Richard Baird; Ian Banks; David Cameron; John Chester; Helena Earl; Mark Flannagan; Adam Januszewski; Richard Kennedy; Sarah Payne; Emlyn Samuel; Hannah Taylor; Roshan Agarwal; Samreen Ahmed; Caroline Archer; Ruth Board; Judith Carser; Ellen Copson; David Cunningham; Rob Coleman; Adam Dangoor; Graham Dark; Diana Eccles; Chris Gallagher; Adam Glaser; Richard Griffiths; Geoff Hall; Marcia Hall; Danielle Harari; Michael Hawkins; Mark Hill; Peter Johnson; Alison Jones; Tania Kalsi; Eleni Karapanagiotou; Zoe Kemp; Janine Mansi; Ernie Marshall; Alex Mitchell; Maung Moe; Caroline Michie; Richard Neal; Tom Newsom-Davis; Alison Norton; Richard Osborne; Gargi Patel; John Radford; Alistair Ring; Emily Shaw; Rod Skinner; Dan Stark; Sam Turnbull; Galina Velikova; Jeff White; Alison Young; Johnathan Joffe; Peter Selby
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-01-05

Review 5.  Management of Cancer in the Older Age Person: An Approach to Complex Medical Decisions.

Authors:  María Vallet-Regí; Miguel Manzano; Leocadio Rodriguez-Mañas; Marta Checa López; Matti Aapro; Lodovico Balducci
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-02-20

6.  Associations of inflammation with frailty in patients with breast cancer aged 50 and over receiving chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nikesha Gilmore; Sindhuja Kadambi; Lianlian Lei; Kah Poh Loh; Mostafa Mohamed; Allison Magnuson; Sharon Cole; Benjamin T Esparaz; Jeffrey K Giguere; Supriya Mohile; Michelle Janelsins
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 7.  Fitness in the elderly: how to make decisions regarding acute myeloid leukemia induction.

Authors:  Arati V Rao
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2016-12-02

8.  Opportunities for quality improvement in the morbidity pattern of older adults undergoing pulmonary lobectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Luis E De León; Matthew M Rochefort; Carlos E Bravo-Iñiguez; Sam W Fox; Jeffrey N Tarascio; Kristin Cardin; Clark DuMontier; Laura N Frain; Michael T Jaklitsch
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation; an alliance study (CALGB 10503, 19808, and 100103).

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Kouros Owzar; Lionel D Lewis; Chen Jiang; Julianne L Holleran; Susan M Christner; William Blum; Steven Devine; Jonathan E Kolitz; Charles Linker; Ravi Vij; Edwin P Alyea; Richard A Larson; Mark J Ratain; Merrill J Egorin
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 10.  Improving outcomes for older women with gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  Lucy Dumas; Alistair Ring; John Butler; Tania Kalsi; Danielle Harari; Susana Banerjee
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 12.111

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.