Literature DB >> 24495416

Comparison of fenestrated and nonfenestrated patients undergoing extracardiac Fontan.

Andrew C Fiore1, Corinne Tan2, Eric Armbrecht3, Charles B Huddleston3, Eric Kim3, Nicholas Goel3, Connor McCartney3, Parth Patel2, John W Brown2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare morbidity and mortality between fenestrated (F, 61 patients) and nonfenestrated (NF, 54 patients) extracardiac Fontan patients during two eras from July 1995 to December 2010: era 1(1995 to 2004) and era 2 (2005 to 2010).
METHODS: Variables evaluated included morphology, hemodynamics, chest tube volume and duration, intensive care and hospital stay, oxygen saturation, neurologic events, rhythm, and readmissions for chylous effusions. Follow-up in 114 hospital survivors was longer in the nonfenestrated cohort (F, 5.0 ± 3.3 years; NF, 7.1 ± 4.6 years; p < 0.005).
RESULTS: Cohorts were similar in body size, morphology, and hemodynamics. Fenestration in hypoplastic left heart syndrome was appreciatively higher in era 2. Bypass time (F, 69 ± 27 minutes; NF, 57 ± 21 minutes) and conduit size (F, 18.8 mm; NF, 19.1 mm) were similar. There was 1 early nonfenestrated Fontan death (1 of 54; 2%) and 4 late deaths (F, 2 of 61, 5%; NF, 2 of 53, 4%; p = 0.86). Room air saturation was higher in NF patients (F, 89%; NF, 94%; p < 0.05). Total chest tube volume was similar, but fenestration was associated with greater chest tube drainage among hypoplastic left heart patients (HLHS, 5,582 ± 3,286 mL; non-HLHS, 3,405 ± 2,533 mL; p = 0.06; odds ratio; 2.0). Readmission to treat chylous effusions, loss of sinus rhythm, actuarial freedom from death, all neurologic events, pacemaker insertion, and Fontan takedown were similar in both cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Fenestration was associated with lower discharge oxygen saturations, but late outcomes in fenestrated and nonfenestrated patients are equivalent.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24495416     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

Review 1.  Fontan Operation: Indications, Short and Long Term Outcomes.

Authors:  P Syamasundar Rao
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Prophylactic Opening of the Pleural Cavity for Postoperative Drainage is a Risk Factor for Prolonged Pleural Effusion After a Fontan Operation.

Authors:  Naoki Masaki; Mizumoto Masahiro; Satoshi Matsuo; Sadahiro Sai
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 3.  Where are we after 50 years of the Fontan operation?

Authors:  Sachin Talwar; Supreet Prakash Marathe; Shiv Kumar Choudhary; Balram Airan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-03-21

Review 4.  Decision-Making for Surgery in the Management of Patients with Univentricular Heart.

Authors:  Ryan Robert Davies; Christian Pizarro
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.418

5.  Percutaneous interventions in Fontan circulation.

Authors:  Eduardo Franco; Enrique José Balbacid Domingo; Viviana Arreo Del Val; Luis Garcia Guereta Silva; María Jesús Del Cerro Marín; Aurora Fernández Ruiz; Fernando Villagrá; Federico Gutiérrez-Larraya Aguado
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-06-23

6.  Long-Term Effects of Percutaneous Fenestration Following the Fontan Procedure in Adult Patients with Congenital Univentricular Heart.

Authors:  Monika Smaś-Suska; Beata Róg; Piotr Weryński; Wojciech Płazak; Monika Komar; Maria Olszowska; Piotr Podolec; Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-26

7.  Comparison of the fenestrated and non-fenestrated Fontan procedures: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dongxu Li; Mengsi Li; Xu Zhou; Qi An
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.