| Literature DB >> 24495338 |
Ashraf Tayeh1, Arnaud Estoup, Eric Lombaert, Thomas Guillemaud, Natalia Kirichenko, Lori Lawson-Handley, Patrick De Clercq, Benoît Facon.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cannibalism is widespread in both vertebrates and invertebrates but its extent is variable between and within species. Cannibalism depends on population density and nutritional conditions, and could be beneficial during colonisation of new environments. Empirical studies are needed to determine whether this trait might facilitate invasion of a new area in natural systems. We investigated whether the propensity for cannibalism in H. axyridis differs both between native and invasive populations and between invasive populations from the core and from the front of the invasive area in Western Europe. We also compared the propensity for cannibalism of these natural populations with that of laboratory-reared biocontrol populations. We measured the cannibalism rates of eggs by first instar larvae and adult females at two different individual densities of ladybirds from three types of population (invasive, native and biocontrol), in laboratory-controlled conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24495338 PMCID: PMC3913791 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-15
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Statistical analyses of cannibalism rates by first instar larvae and adult females of
| | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1- Spatial expansion in Europe | F (df) | | F (df) | |
| Spatial level | 0.64 (2) | 0.5252 | 0.20 (2) | 0.8173 |
| Population (Spatial level) | 0.34 (3) | 0.7914 | 0.15 (3) | 0.9279 |
| Density | 14.07 (1) | 1.19 (1) | ||
| Spatial level × Density | 2.38 (2) | 0.0949 | 0.78 (2) | 0.4556 |
| 2- Different types of population | | | | |
| Population type | 17.44 (2) | 0.19 (2) | 0.8262 | |
| Population (Population type) | 0.59 (7) | 0.5106 | 0.72 (7) | 0.6482 |
| Density | 22.63 (1) | 4.34 (1) | ||
| Population type × Density | 0.34 (2) | 0.7066 | 0.40 (2) | 0.6706 |
Note: Analysis 1- focuses on spatial expansion in Western Europe (invaded area), and analysis 2-compare different types of populations, i.e. native, invasive and biocontrol. Significant P-values at the 5% threshold are shown in bold.
Figure 1Mean numbers of eggs eaten per individual (± standard error) by first instar larvae of . Note: Results are given for (A) the three spatial levels within Europe expanding range (core, intermediate and front), (B) the low and high individual density treatments in data (A) pooling geographic locations, (C) three types of studied populations (i.e. Native, Invasive and Biocontrol populations), and (D) the low and high density treatments in data (C) pooling the different population types. Bars marked by different letters are significantly different at the 5% threshold (P-levels are mentioned in the main text and Table 1).
Figure 2Mean number of eggs eaten per individual (± standard error) by adult females of Note: Results are given for (A) the three spatial levels within Europe expanding range (core, intermediate and front), (B) the low and high individual density treatments in data (A) pooling geographic locations, (C) three types of studied populations (i.e. Native, Invasive and Biocontrol populations), and (D) the low and high density treatments in data (C) pooling the different population types. Bars marked by different letters are significantly different at the 5% threshold (P-levels are mentioned in the main text and Table 1).
Figure 3Geographic locations of the sampled populations of Note: (A) Geographical regions of the different native (Z1 and Z2) and invasive (X1 to X3 and Y1 to Y3) sampled populations of H. axyridis. Closed circles correspond to locations where the two native populations have been sampled. (B) The Western European invasive populations of H. axyridis were sampled along two transects. Letters (X or Y) correspond to the transect names, and years are the dates of the first observation of H. axyridis at the sampled geographic localities. Two biocontrol populations reared in European laboratories since 1981, probably originating from China, were also used for the present study. See main text for details.
Sampling details of the ten studied populations
| Invasive | Brussels (Belgium) | X1 | 50.839°N | 0 | 2001 |
| 4.368°E | |||||
| | Fondettes (France) | X2 | 47.402°N | 469 | 2006 |
| 0.637°E | |||||
| | Chizé (France) | X3 | 46.148°N | 629 | 2009 |
| 0.424°W | | ||||
| | Walhain (Belgium) | Y1 | 50.612°N | 0 | 2001 |
| 4.668°E | | ||||
| | Quincieux (France) | Y2 | 45.909°N | 522 | 2007 |
| 4.758°E | | ||||
| | Prade-le-lez (France) | Y3 | 43.698°N | 770 | 2008 |
| 3.863°E | | ||||
| Native | Krasnoyarsk (Russia) | Z1 | 56.001°N | N/A | N/A |
| 92.885°E | | ||||
| | Fuchu (Japan) | Z2 | 34.57°N | N/A | N/A |
| 133.24°E | | ||||
| Biocontrol | Valbonne (France) | W1 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Westerlo (Belgium) | W2 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Note: Two populations were sampled in the native area (Z1 and Z2), six in the European invaded area (X1 to X3 and Y1 to Y3) and two populations originated from commercial biocontrol stocks (W1 and W2). For the European invasive populations, samples were collected along two transects starting from the outbreak core and ending near the invasion front (see Figure 3). N/A – not assessed.