Hans-Jürgen Möller1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University , Munich , Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: After 10 years of preparation, DSM-5 was published in 2013. This paper will examine the possible effects of DSM-5 on psychiatric diagnosis and psychopharmacotherapy. METHODS: DSM-5 was compared with DSM-IV to identify the important changes in psychiatric diagnosis and possible consequences for psychopharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 did not make radical changes and move towards dimensional diagnosis but preserved the previous categorical system of disorders and a primarily symptom-based descriptive approach. The dimensional approach was only adopted through the introduction of several transnosological specifiers and the option to make symptom- or syndrome-related assessments. The criteria for some disorders were changed, including affective, dependence and schizophrenic disorders, and a few new disorders were added. CONCLUSION: The DSM-IV diagnostic system was largely preserved, although some changes were made, primarily in the field of affective disorder and in several criteria sets. The new transnosological specifiers, severity assessments and cross-cutting dimensional assessments may help to individualise treatment.
OBJECTIVE: After 10 years of preparation, DSM-5 was published in 2013. This paper will examine the possible effects of DSM-5 on psychiatric diagnosis and psychopharmacotherapy. METHODS: DSM-5 was compared with DSM-IV to identify the important changes in psychiatric diagnosis and possible consequences for psychopharmacotherapy. RESULTS: Contrary to the original plans, DSM-5 did not make radical changes and move towards dimensional diagnosis but preserved the previous categorical system of disorders and a primarily symptom-based descriptive approach. The dimensional approach was only adopted through the introduction of several transnosological specifiers and the option to make symptom- or syndrome-related assessments. The criteria for some disorders were changed, including affective, dependence and schizophrenic disorders, and a few new disorders were added. CONCLUSION: The DSM-IV diagnostic system was largely preserved, although some changes were made, primarily in the field of affective disorder and in several criteria sets. The new transnosological specifiers, severity assessments and cross-cutting dimensional assessments may help to individualise treatment.