Literature DB >> 24494748

Can a first-order exponential decay model fit heart rate recovery after resistance exercise?

Rhenan Bartels-Ferreira1, Élder D de Sousa, Gabriela A Trevizani, Lilian P Silva, Fábio Y Nakamura, Cláudia L M Forjaz, Jorge Roberto P Lima, Tiago Peçanha.   

Abstract

The time-constant of postexercise heart rate recovery (HRRτ ) obtained by fitting heart rate decay curve by a first-order exponential fitting has being used to assess cardiac autonomic recovery after endurance exercise. The feasibility of this model was not tested after resistance exercise (RE). The aim of this study was to test the goodness of fit of the first-order exponential decay model to fit heart rate recovery (HRR) after RE. Ten healthy subjects participated in the study. The experimental sessions occurred in two separated days and consisted of performance of 1 set of 10 repetitions at 50% or 80% of the load achieved on the one-repetition maximum test [low-intensity (LI) and high-intensity (HI) sessions, respectively]. Heart rate (HR) was continuously registered before and during exercise and also for 10 min of recovery. A monoexponential equation was used to fit the HRR curve during the postexercise period using different time windows (i.e. 30, 60, 90, … 600 s). For each time window, (i) HRRτ was calculated and (ii) variation of HR explained by the model (R(2) goodness of fit index) was assessed. The HRRτ showed stabilization from 360 and 420 s on LI and HI, respectively. Acceptable R(2) values were observed from the 360 s on LI (R(2) > 0.65) and at all tested time windows on HI (R(2) > 0.75). In conclusion, this study showed that using a minimum length of monitoring (~420 s) HRR after RE can be adequately modelled by a first-order exponential fitting.
© 2014 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  autonomic modulation; autonomic nervous system; exercise; heart rate; heart rate recovery; resistance training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24494748     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  5 in total

1.  Heart rate recovery fast-to-slow phase transition: Influence of physical fitness and exercise intensity.

Authors:  Rhenan Bartels; Eliza Prodel; Mateus C Laterza; Jorge Roberto P de Lima; Tiago Peçanha
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Coherence Between Feelings and Heart Rate: Links to Early Adversity and Responses to Stress.

Authors:  Kate Petrova; Michael D Nevarez; Jenna Rice; Robert J Waldinger; Kristopher J Preacher; Marc S Schulz
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2021-01-12

3.  Independent influence of age on heart rate recovery after flywheel exercise in trained men and women.

Authors:  Damir Zubac; Nandu Goswami; Vladimir Ivančev; Zoran Valić; Boštjan Šimunič
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Estimation of Heart Rate Recovery after StairClimbing Using aWrist-Worn Device.

Authors:  Daivaras Sokas; Andrius Petrėnas; Saulius Daukantas; Andrius Rapalis; Birutė Paliakaitė; Vaidotas Marozas
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Associations Between Heart Rate Recovery Dynamics With Estradiol Levels in 20 to 60 Year-Old Sedentary Women.

Authors:  Thomas Beltrame; Aparecida M Catai; Ana C Rebelo; Nayara Y Tamburús; Roberta S Zuttin; Anielle C de Medeiros Takahashi; Ester da Silva
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.