| Literature DB >> 24494239 |
Abhimanyu Jogawat, Shreya Saha, Madhunita Bakshi, Vikram Dayaman, Manoj Kumar, Meenakshi Dua, Ajit Varma, Ralf Oelmüller, Narendra Tuteja, Atul Kumar Johri.
Abstract
Piriformospora indica association has been reported to increase biotic as well as abiotic stress tolerance of its host plants. We analyzed the beneficial effect of P. indica association on rice seedlings during high salt stress conditions (200 and 300 mM NaCl). The growth parameters of rice seedlings such as root and shoot lengths or fresh and dry weights were found to be enhanced in P. indica-inoculated rice seedlings as compared with non-inoculated control seedlings, irrespective of whether they are exposed to salt stress or not. However, salt-stressed seedlings performed much better in the presence of the fungus compared with non-inoculated control seedlings. The photosynthetic pigment content [chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b, and carotenoids] was significantly higher in P. indica-inoculated rice seedlings under high salt stress conditions as compared with salt-treated non-inoculated rice seedlings, in which these pigments were found to be decreased. Proline accumulation was also observed during P. indica colonization, which may help the inoculated plants to become salt tolerant. Taken together, P. indica rescues growth diminution of rice seedlings under salt stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24494239 PMCID: PMC4091109 DOI: 10.4161/psb.26891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Signal Behav ISSN: 1559-2316

Figure 1.P. indica colonization of rice roots. (A) Negative control inoculated with autoclaved P. indica shows no chlamydspores in the root cortex region. (B) Rice root segment showing colonization at 15 dpi. (C) Root colonization at 20 dpi. Fifteen days after P. indica inoculation, 60% colonization was detected. Control rice plants were mock treated with autoclaved P. indica and contained no spores. Arrow indicates a single chlamydospore of P. indica.

Figure 2.P. indica colonization. (A) Non-inoculated rice roots were thinner when compared with P. indica-inoculated rice roots. Strong, hard, and brownish roots were observed in P. indica-inoculated rice plants. (B) Root number in 25-d-old control plants and those inoculated by P. indica (15 dpi). Root numbers are higher in case of P. indica-inoculated rice. Each column represents the means of 3 measurements ± Standard Error.
Table 1. Growth parameters of non-inoculated (NI) and P. indica-inoculated (PI) rice seedlings
| No salt stress | 200 mM salt stress | 300mM salt stress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NI | PI | NI | PI | NI | PI | |
| Shoot length | ||||||
| 10.4 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.1 | 10.4 ± 0.1 | |
| 10.8 ± 0.4 | 14.5 ± 0.6 | 11.1 ± 0.2 | 12.4 ± 0.5* | 12.2 ± 0.7 | 13.7 ± 0.8 | |
| 13.0 ± 0.4 | 15.2 ± 0.4* | 10.9 ± 1.3 | 13.2 ± 0.6 | 11.3 ± 0.2 | 14.1 ± 0.2 | |
| 13.1 ± 0.5 | 15.3 ± 0.3 | 12.4 ± 0.3 | 13.2 ± 0.3* | 12.0 ± 0.4 | 13.9 ± 2.0* | |
Note: Root and shoot lengths of non-inoculated and P. indica-inoculated rice seedlings under high salt stress: Root and shoot lengths were found high as colonization progressed. Fresh weight and dry weight of rice seedlings grown under high salt stress: Fresh and dry weights were found to be high in P. indica-inoculated plants. Each data set represents the means of 3 independent measurements ± SE *indicates not significant as compared with the control (non-inoculated); all other data are found significant at p < 0.05.

Figure 3. Rice plants after 10 d salt stress. For representation purposes, one pot per treatment is shown. (A) For 200 mM and (B) for 300 mM salt stress. (a) Non-inoculated rice without salt treatment. (b) P. indica-inoculated rice without salt treatment. (c) Non-inoculated rice treated with 200 (300) mM salt. (d) P. indica-inoculated rice treated with 200 (300) mM salt.
Table 2. Photosynthesis pigments of non-inoculated (NI) and P. indica-inoculated (PI) rice seedlings
| No salt stress | 200 mM salt stress | 300mM salt stress | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NI | PI | NI | PI | NI | PI | |
| Chl a content | ||||||
| 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.76 ± 0.05 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.57 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.86 ± 0.04 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | |
| 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.90 ± 0.00 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.03 | |
Note: Photosynthetic pigment content of non-inoculated and P. indica-inoculated rice plants: The values obtained by 3 independent samples were divided by leaf FW, and the photosynthetic pigment content was calculated as nmol/ml/mg of leaf FW. Each data set represents the means of 3 independent experiments ± SE. The pigment concentrations were more decreased in non-inoculated plants. *indicates not significant as compared with the respective control; all other data are found significant at p < 0.05.
Table 3. Total proline content of non-inoculated (NI) and P. indica-inoculated (PI) rice seedlings under 200 mM salt stress (SS)
| NI | PI | NI+SS | PI+SS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 0.5 | 8.0 ± 0.5 |
| Day 1 | 9.1 ± 0.3 | 12.0 ± 0.5 | 21.3 ± 0.3 | 23.3 ± 0.1 |
| Day 2 | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 22.8 ± 0.8 | 25.0 ± 0.2 | 30.0 ± 1.6 |
| Day 4 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 31.9 ± 0.8 | 34.9 ± 0.7 | 43.7 ± 1.0 |
| Day 5 | 10.6 ± 0.4 | 62.0 ± 1.0 | 38.4 ± 0.4 | 58.3 ± 0.4 |
| Day 10 | 11.7 ± 0.8 | 60.4 ± 0.16 | 39.0 ± 0.2 | 59.0 ± 0.4 |
| Day 15 | 12.7 ± 0.2 | 55.0 ± 1.7 | 38.9 ± 0.3 | 61.1 ± 0.6 |
Note: Ten-day-old seedlings (Day 0) rice seedlings were inoculated with P. indica, exposed to salt treatment, or both or no treatment for up to 15 d. The proline content was determinate at the given days. Each data represents the means of 3 independent experiments ± SE. All the data are significantly different at p < 0.05.