| Literature DB >> 24494057 |
Sergio Setsuo Maeda1, Gabriela Luporini Saraiva1, Lilian Fukusima Hayashi1, Maysa Seabra Cendoroglo2, Luiz Roberto Ramos3, Marcelo de Paula Corrêa4, Carlos Henrique de Mesquita5, Marise Lazaretti-Castro1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in individuals in the city of São Paulo belonging to different age groups and exhibiting specific behavioral characteristics and to correlate the 25(OH)D concentration with the level of UV radiation (UVR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 591 individuals were included, distributed as follows: 177 were living in institutions (NURSING, 76.2 ± 9.0 y old), 243 were part of the community elderly (COMMUNITY, 79.6 ± 5.3 y old), 99 were enrolled in a physical activity program targeting the elderly (ACTIVE, 67.6 ± 5.4 y old) and 72 were young (YOUNG, 23.9 ± 2.8 y old). Blood samples from all individuals were collected throughout the year. UVR measurements were taken by an official meteorology institution.Entities:
Keywords: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; delayed response; nadir; outdoor activity; seasonal variability; sun exposure; ultraviolet radiation
Year: 2013 PMID: 24494057 PMCID: PMC3897593 DOI: 10.4161/derm.24476
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dermatoendocrinol ISSN: 1938-1972

Figure 1. Distribution of the mean UVR levels (mJ/cm2) according to the month of the year and time of day.
Table 1. Body mass index, 25(OH)D for each population group, grouped according to the season of the year and UVR values
| Season of the year | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMIŦ | Summer | Fall | Winter | Spring | P | |||||||
| – | 63.9 ± 3.3 | 36.8 ± 12.3 | 25.7 ± 5.8 | 53.2 ± 7.6 | ||||||||
| 26.3 ± 5.6a | – | 36.3 | 23.0 | – | ||||||||
| 26.7 ± 4.3a | 54.6 | 58.0 | 40.0 | 42.8 | ||||||||
| 26.8 ± 4.4a | – | 77.2 | - | 87.5 | ||||||||
| 22.4 ± 3.0 | 106.6 ± 35.0 | – | 74.8 ± 28.2 | 68.0 ± 24.7 | ||||||||
UVR values (mJ/cm2) for each season of the year and body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and 25(OH)D concentration (nmol/L) for each population group, grouped according to the season of the year. The parameters with a normal distribution are summarized using the mean and standard deviation, and the data with a non-normal distribution are summarized using the median and variation. ŦTukey test; *Mann–Whitney test; #Kruskal–Wallis test; anot significant.
Table 2. Using the formula equations to predict the UVR level (mJ/cm2) and 25(OH)D concentration (nmol/L) for each group were developed
| P1 | P2 | P3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 44.9 ± 0.5 | 22.7 ± 0.7 | 39.2 ± 0.3 | |
| 37.3 ± 2.9 | 7.1 ± 0.1 | 35.5 ± 1.1 | |
| 51.1 ± 1.0 | 10.5 ± 1.5 | 18.1 ± 0.3 | |
| 85.2 ± 9.1 | 12.8 ± 0.8 | 35.1 ± 0.1 | |
| 93.3 ± 1.8 | 25.4 ± 2.3 | 30.5 ± 0.2 |
P1 represents the mean value, P2 represents the amplitude and P3 is the time phase parameter. The delay represents the time in months between the lowest value for the UV radiation level and the lowest 25(OH)D concentration for each group.

Figure 2. Models representing the sinusoidal curves for each group, which were created from the equation presented in Table 2. The months are represented numerically (1 – January, 2 – February, ….)

Figure 3. Distribution of the mean UVR and 25(OH)D levels for each group according to the month of the year and their respective curves created using sinusoidal equations. Graphical representation of the delay between the lowest UVR level and the lowest 25(OH)D level for the NURSING group.