| Literature DB >> 24493998 |
Wioletta A Zukiewicz-Sobczak1, Grażyna Cholewa1, Ewelina Krasowska1, Jolanta Chmielewska-Badora1, Jacek Zwoliński2, Paweł Sobczak2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Agricultural producers are exposed to a number of different health risks associated with their work environment. AIM: The objective of the study was to assess the degree of colonization by fungi in terms of quantity and in terms of variety of species the samples taken from the settled dust from combine threshing of rye cultivation from organic and conventional farms in the Province of Lublin.Entities:
Keywords: alveolitis allergica; conventional crops; molds; organic agriculture
Year: 2013 PMID: 24493998 PMCID: PMC3907900 DOI: 10.5114/pdia.2013.39434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Postepy Dermatol Alergol ISSN: 1642-395X Impact factor: 1.837
Fungi identified in dust samples from organic and conventional crops, isolated on Malt Agar (MA) and Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA)
| Fungi | Organic farming [%] | Conventional farming [%] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDA | MA | PDA | MA | |
|
| 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 2.1 |
|
| 16.1 | 24.5 | 12.6 | 18.2 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 4.1 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
|
| 1.5 | 1.6 | 6.1 | 9.4 |
|
| 15.3 | 2.0 | 6.1 | 3.3 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 |
|
| 0.0 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 0.0 |
|
| 11.3 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 10.1 |
|
| 9.1 | 6.4 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
|
| 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 3.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 12.2 | 10.0 | 10.5 | 10.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 |
|
| 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.4 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 0.9 |
|
| 9.2 | 6.9 | 12.5 | 7.3 |
|
| 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 2.3 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
|
| 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 1.1 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
|
| 12.7 | 11.9 | 8.4 | 9.9 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 |
|
| 2.1 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
| 2.0 | 2.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
|
| 0.5 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 |
|
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 |
|
| 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Yeast-like fungi | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concentration of fungi in samples of settled rye dust during combine threshing
| Sample no | Organic farming [× 103 CFU/g] | Conventional farming [CFU/g] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDA | MA | PDA | MA | |
| 1 | 1455 | 1575 | 1300 | 1105 |
| 2 | 965 | 635 | 1495 | 1330 |
| 3 | 1835 | 5725 | 11320 | 1705 |
| 4 | 7170 | 5400 | 2380 | 2700 |
| 5 | 1230 | 1450 | 3760 | 3135 |
| 6 | 5270 | 1910 | 2480 | 2035 |
| 7 | 6830 | 1300 | 13445 | 1420 |
| 8 | 5530 | 6060 | 1870 | 2390 |
| 9 | 2100 | 1110 | 2690 | 1985 |
| 10 | 2965 | 785 | 2410 | 5305 |
| Mean | 3535 | 2595 | 4315 | 2311 |
Biosafety level (BSL) of fungi isolated from rye dust [9, 12, 28, 29]
| Fungi isolated from rye dust | Biosafety level |
|---|---|
|
| ND |
|
| ND |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
|
| II |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
|
| II |
|
| ND |
|
| II |
|
| ND |
|
| ND |
|
| ND |
|
| ND |
|
| ND |
| Yeast-like fungi | ND |
|
| II |
|
| ND |
|
| I |
|
| II |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
|
| ND |
|
| II |
|
| I |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
|
| I |
|
| ND |
ND – not determined
Activity of enzymes secreted by isolated fungi on media Czapek-Dox Broth (Czapek) and Sabouraud Dextrose Broth (Sabouraud)
| Isolates | Medium | Activity of enzymes | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | ||
|
| Czapek | 3 | 2 | 1 | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | – | – | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 | – | – | 4 | 5 | – | – |
| Sabouraud | 3 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | – | – | 4 | 1 | 2 | – | |
|
| Czapek | – | 2 | 3 | – | 2 | 1 | – | 4 | – | 1 | 1 | 2 | – | – | 1 | 5 | 5 | – | – |
| Sabouraud | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | 2 | – | – | 1 | 5 | 2 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | – | 1 | 1 | – | 5 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 2 | – | 3 | 4 | 4 | – | 2 |
| Sabouraud | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | 2 | – | 1 | 3 | 1 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | 4 | 1 | 2 | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 | – | – | 3 | 3 | – | – |
| Sabouraud | 4 | 2 | 2 | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | – | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | – | |
|
| Czapek | 4 | – | – | – | 1 | 4 | – | – | – | 3 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 4 | – | – |
| Sabouraud | 2 | – | – | – | 3 | – | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 3 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | 3 | – | 1 | – |
| Sabouraud | 1 | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | 2 | – | – | 3 | 1 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | 2 | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 3 | – | – | – | 4 | 4 | – | – |
| Sabouraud | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 3 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | – | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | 2 | 2 | – | – |
| Sabouraud | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | 3 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 5 | 5 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | 2 | 2 | 2 | – | 1 | – | – | 1 | – | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | – |
| Sabouraud | 3 | – | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | 2 | 4 | 1 | – | – | – | 3 | 3 | – | – | |
|
| Czapek | 1 | 2 | 2 | – | 1 | – | – | 4 | – | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | – | 5 | – | – | – |
| Sabouraud | 2 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 4 | – | – | |
Enzymes: 1) alkaline phosphatase, 2) esterase (C 4), 3) esterase lipase (C 8), 4) lipase (C 14), 5) leucine arylamidase, 6) valine arylamidase, 7) cystine arylamidase, 8) trypsin, 9) α-chymotrypsin, 10) acid phosphatase, 11) naphthol-as-bi-phosphohydrolase, 12) α-galactosidase, 13) β-galactosidase, 14) β-glucuronidase, 15) α-glucosidase, 16) β-glucosidase, 17) N-acetylo-β-glucosaminidase, 18) α-mannosidase, 19) α-fucosidase
0 – no activity, 1–5 – activity increases with color intensity (1 – low activity, 5 – high activity)