Challenges associated with the management of gynecological cancers in a tertiary hospital in South East Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: There are reports of increasing incidence of gynecological cancers in developing countries and this trend increases the need for more attention to gynecological cancer care in these countries.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the presentation and treatment of gynecological cancers and identify barriers to successful gynecological cancer treatment in a tertiary hospital in South East Nigeria.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective longitudinal analysis of the presentation and treatment of histologically diagnosed primary gynecological cancers from 2000 to 2010. Analysis was by descriptive and inferential statistics at the 95% level of confidence using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17 software.
RESULTS: Records of 200 gynecological cancers managed during the study period were analyzed. Over 94% of cervical cancers presented in advanced stages of the disease and received palliative/symptomatic treatment. Only 1.9% of cervical cancer patients had radical surgical intervention, and postoperative mortality from these radical surgeries was 100%. Approximately 76% of patients with ovarian cancer had debulking surgery as the mainstay of treatment followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Postoperative mortality from ovarian cancer surgery was 63%. Cutting edge cytotoxic drugs were not used as chemotherapy for ovarian and chorionic cancers. Compliance with chemotherapy was poor, with over 70% of ovarian cancer patients failing to complete the prescribed courses of chemotherapy. Most patients with endometrial and vulval cancers had only surgical treatment, as compliance with follow-up for adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was poor. Functional radiotherapy facilities were not available at the center during the study period, thereby necessitating external referrals to centers hundreds of kilometers away.
CONCLUSION: Late presentation of cases, noncompliance with treatment regimens, lack of use of cutting edge cytotoxic drugs, the poor outcome of radical surgeries, and lack of a functional radiotherapy facility combined to create a very difficult gynecological cancer care environment at the study center.

Introduction

There is an increasing documentation of cancers, including gynecological cancers, in developing countries.1 A recent global report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer showed that gynecological cancers accounted for 25% of all new cancers diagnosed in women aged up to 65 years compared with 16% in the developed world.2 Similarly, a report on the global burden of cancer showed that developing countries accounted for 820,265 cases (77.7%) of global estimates for new cases of the commonest gynecological cancers, including cervical, corpus, and ovarian cancer, in 2009.1

This observed trend in developing countries has been attributed to several possibilities including the shift to a Western lifestyle and behaviors such as cigarette smoking, low fiber/high fat diets, and less physical activity; a high prevalence of immunosuppressing conditions such as malnutrition, tuberculosis, and human immunodeficiency virus; a high prevalence of oncogenic infections such as hepatitis B virus, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, human papilloma virus, and Helicobacter pylori.3 It has also been suggested that this trend could be, in part, due to reporting bias arising from increasing use of orthodox care occasioned by increasing health awareness at the population level in some developing countries.4

With the increasing documentation of gynecological cancers in developing countries, it would be expected that efforts at screening and management of cancers should be scaled up to meet the increasing demands for care. Unfortunately, challenges to these efforts appear to persist and a huge unmet need for funding for gynecological cancer care continues to prevail in developing countries.5,6

There have been several reports on the prevalence of gynecological cancers in South East Nigeria.7,8 Gynecological cancers have been shown to contribute overwhelmingly to gynecological mortality in our environment.9 However, we found scanty literature on the management of these cancers. This study describes the challenges in management of gynecological cancers in a major referral hospital in South East Nigeria over the last decade in order to highlight the major clinical barriers to successful outcomes in the management of gynecological cancers.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective longitudinal analysis of the presentation and treatment of histologically diagnosed primary gynecological cancers managed at the study center. The study covered the period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2010. The study population included all women admitted and treated in the gynecology department of the hospital during the study period. A purposive sample of consecutive women with gynecological cancer was taken. A written application was made to the cancer registry of the study center, following which all cases of gynecological cancer seen during the study period and their biographic, clinical, and mortality data were compiled by the cancer registry. Subsequently, the histological diagnoses of these cases were retrieved from the histopathology department of the hospital. The case notes of these selected cases were retrieved from the records department, and the records of each patient were followed up from presentation until the last records of care. Data relating to age, parity, clinical presentation, and treatment modalities, including details of surgical procedures, chemotherapy regimens, and outcomes of treatment, were abstracted and coded using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 17 software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) for Windows for analysis. Where case notes were not available or had missing data, efforts were made to obtain patient data from ward admission records and operating theater records. Mortality data were compiled from the cancer registry records, case notes, and mortuary records. Data analysis was by descriptive and inferential statistics at the 95% level of confidence. P-values ≤0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Ethical consent was obtained from the research ethics committee of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu.

Results

The total number of histologically diagnosed cases of primary gynecological cancer obtained over an eleven-year period was 236. The records of 200 cases could be retrieved, giving a recovery rate of 84.7%. Case records were available for 76.3% (106/139) of cases of cervical cancer, 92.6% (50/54) of cases of ovarian cancer; all 19 cases of endometrial cancer, ten cases of choriocarcinoma, ten cases of vulvar cancer, and four cases of leiomyosarcoma. The case record for the only case of vaginal cancer was not available. The total number of gynecological admissions during the period was 6,527. Gynecological malignancies constituted 3.6% of all gynecological admissions. Table 1 shows the distribution of gynecological cancers based on patient characteristics.

Table 1

Distribution of gynecological cancers based on characteristics of patients

Characteristic	Frequency of gynecological cancer (n=200)	Percentage
Age (years)
10–20	5	2.5
21–30	11	5.5
31–40	16	8.0
41–50	40	20.0
51–60	47	23.5
61–70	49	24.5
71–80	22	11
Parity
0	27	13.5
1–4	96	48.0
≥5	67	33.5
Marital status
Single	21	10.5
Married	109	54.5
Widowed	60	30.0
Religion
Christianity	184	92.0
Islam	5	2.5
Traditional religion	1	0.5
Christian denomination
Roman Catholic	78	39.0
Anglican	47	23.5
Pentecostal	53	26.5
Others	8	4.0
Ethnic group
Igbo	178	89.0
Non-Igbo	12	6.0
Occupation
Unemployed	71	35.5
Farmer	40	20.0
Civil servant	21	10.5
Trader	35	17.5
Teacher	5	2.5
Nurse	2	1.0
Student	16	8.0
Menstrual status
Premenopausal	57	28.5
Post-menopausal	133	66.5

Cervical cancer

There were 139 cases of cervical cancer, constituting 2.1% of gynecological admissions. Cervical cancer constituted 58.9% (139/236) of all gynecological malignancies. One hundred and six cases of cervical cancer for which case records were available were analyzed. The mean age of women with cervical cancer was 57.5±12.6 (range 35–82) years, and approximately 69% (73/106) of women with cervical cancer were over 50 years of age, 92% (98/106) were multiparous, and 75% (80/106) were postmenopausal. Table 2 shows the clinicopathological characteristics of cervical cancer during the study period. All but one cervical cancer patients had examination under anesthesia, clinical staging, and biopsy. Approximately 94.3% (100/106) of cases presented in stages 3 and 4; 4.7% (5/106) presented in stage 2, while 0.9% (1/106) was diagnosed after a cone biopsy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia type III and was in stage 1b.

Table 2

Clinicopathological features of cervical and ovarian cancers seen at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, from 2000 to 2010

Type of cancer	Clinical/pathological features		Cases (n)	Percentage
Cervical (n=106)	Presenting symptoms	Post-menopausal bleeding	105	99.1
		Foul-smelling vaginal discharge	70	66.0
		Post-coital bleeding	33	31.1
	Stage of disease	1	1	0.9
		2	5	4.7
		3	61	57.5
		4	39	36.8
	Histological type	Squamous carcinoma	101	95.3
		Adenocarcinoma	5	4.7
Ovarian (n=50)	Presenting symptoms	Abdominal mass	32	64
		Abdominal pains and discomfort	26	52
		Weight loss	6	12
	Stage of disease at presentation	1	0	0
		2	4	8
		3	32	64
		4	14	28
	Histological type	Subtype
	Epithelial tumors	Serous cystadenocarcinoma	18	36
		Mucinous cystadenocarcinoma	12	24
		Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma	4	8
	Sex cord stromal tumors	Granulosa cell tumor	4	8
		Poorly differentiated Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor	2	4
		Invasive alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma	2	4
	Germ cell tumors	Malignant teratoma	4	8
		Dysgerminoma	2	4
		Endodermal sinus tumor	2	4

Treatment of patients with stages 3 and 4 cervical cancer involved mainly symptomatic care/palliative care with injectable and/or oral analgesics, antibiotics, blood transfusion, and intravenous infusions. There was no record of patient-controlled analgesia for cervical cancer. Two cases with stage 3b disease had urinary diversion (suprapubic cystostomy) by urologists to relieve bladder outlet obstruction.

Two of the five cases with stage 2 disease were in stage 2a and had radical hysterectomy/bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: the other three were in stage 2b and were referred directly for radical radiotherapy. Referrals for radiotherapy were to any of the four centers with functional radiotherapy facilities in the country during the study period. There was no radiotherapy facility in the study center during the study period. The only case with stage 1b disease had simple hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.

Approximately 56.6% (60/106) of the patients were discharged home on request to continue palliative care with appointments to return for further review, and all were lost to follow-up. The only case with stage 1b disease had a record of a hospital visit 2 years after hysterectomy and had remained symptom-free. She was subsequently lost to follow-up. Approximately 39.6% (42/106) of cervical cancer patients had a record of death while still in the hospital, and these included the two who had radical hysterectomy and died within one week of surgery. Mortality and survival data for the remaining 60% were not available.

Ovarian cancer

There were 54 cases of ovarian cancer, constituting 0.8% of all gynecological admissions. The records of 50 cases of ovarian cancer were available for analysis. Ovarian cancer constituted 22.9% (54/236) of all gynecological malignancies. The mean patient age for all histological subtypes was 45.4±17.1 years. The mean patient ages for the different subtypes were epithelial cancer 50.3±13.2 years, sex cord 53.1±13.3 years, and germ cell 18.5±8.3 years. Table 2 shows the clinicopathological characteristics of ovarian cancer during the study period.

Women who had ovarian cancer were on average younger than those with other gynecological cancers (mean age 45.4 years versus 57.4 years; P<0.001). For epithelial ovarian cancer specifically, the average age at presentation was also significantly lower than the average age of presentation for the other primary gynecological cancers (50.3 years versus 57.4 years; P=0.03). Most cases of epithelial ovarian cancer occurred at 50 years or younger, and epithelial ovarian cancer was more prevalent under 50 years compared with other gynecological cancers (52% versus 30%, P=0.01). Multiparous women constituted 72.40% (including 38% in grand multiparous women) of epithelial ovarian cancer, and about 35% of epithelial ovarian cancers occurred in premenopausal women.

Management of ovarian cancer was through a multidisciplinary approach involving gynecologists, general surgeons, and occasionally urologists; there was no trained gynecological oncologist in the center during the study period. General surgeons participated in most surgeries involving bowel resection. Most patients had optimal debulking surgery and chemotherapy. Approximately 76% (38/50) of the patients had surgical staging/biopsy and maximal debulking surgery involving total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and different combinations of omentectomy, appendectomy, bowel resection, and adhesiolysis.

The remaining 24% (12/50) were treated as follows: one patient, a 9-year-old girl, had excision of a unilateral tubo-ovarian mass which was found to be a borderline tumor on histology. Four of the patients (4/50, 8%) were referred to the study center for histological diagnosis and chemotherapy after surgery had been done in private clinics. Seven of the 50 patients (14%) had inoperable tumors at surgery; two of these had neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and paclitaxel prior to surgery. All seven had staging/biopsy followed by palliative treatment.

Eighty-four percent (42/50) of the patients had chemotherapy involving cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. The combinations comprised a platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) and paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, or doxorubicin. Approximately 74% (37/50) of patients had cisplatin and cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin: only 10% (5/50) of patients were given combinations containing carboplatin or paclitaxel. However, approximately 81% (34/42) of patients who were given chemotherapy had one or two courses only and abandoned further chemotherapy. Approximately 28.6% (6/42) had six courses, while 4.8% (2/42) had four courses. All patients had injectable and/or oral analgesics for pain relief and antibiotics for sepsis as part of symptomatic/palliative therapy. The use of patient-controlled analgesia was not found in the records. Follow-up of patients was by clinical examination and transabdominal/transvaginal ultrasonography. CA125 assay was not routinely done because of lack of facilities within the hospital. Only two patients who had stage 2 disease had records of CA125 assays done outside the study center. Both were serous cystadenocarcinoma. Approximately 70% (38/54) of cases had a record of death from the disease in the hospital; 63% of these (24/38) died within one week of surgery. Mortality or survival data for the remaining 29.6% (16/54) were not available.

Corpus uteri cancer

There were 33 cases of corpus uteri cancer, constituting 0.5% of all gynecological admissions. Corpus uteri cancers comprised approximately 14% (33/236) of all gynecological malignancies. These cancers were made up of 19 (57.6%) cases of endometrial carcinoma, ten (30.3%) of choriocarcinoma, and four (12.1%) of leiomyosarcoma. Table 3 shows the clinicopathological features of corpus uteri cancer seen during the period.

Table 3

Clinicopathological features of corpus uteri, vulvar, and vaginal cancers seen at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, from 2000 to 2010

Cancer type			Number	Percentage
Corpus uteri cancer (n=33)	Presenting symptoms	Vaginal bleeding	29	87.9
		Lower abdominal mass	6	18.1
		Lower abdominal pains	14	42.4
	Stage of disease	1	3	8.7
		2	23	69.6
		3	6	21.7
		4	1	3
	Histological type	Endometrial carcinoma	19	57.6
		Choriocarcinoma	10	30.3
		Leiomyosarcoma	4	12.1
Vulvar (n=10)	Presenting symptoms	Vulvar ulcer	8	80
		Vulvar itching	2	20
		Vulvar bleeding	6	60
	Stage of disease	1	2	20
		2	3	30
		3	4	40
		4	1	10
	Histological type	Squamous carcinoma	10	100

Endometrial cancers constituted 8.1% (19/236) of cases of all gynecological malignancies. The mean age of patients with endometrial carcinoma was 56.1±12.7 years. Approximately 90% (17/19) of cases were multiparous. Approximately 90% of cases of endometrial carcinoma presented in stages 1 and 2. The commonest presenting symptoms for endometrial cancer were postmenopausal bleeding (78.3%) and lower abdominal pain (26%). Endometrial cancer was not recorded in patients under the age of 50 years. All cases of endometrial carcinoma had an initial endometrial biopsy and definitive interval surgery. Facilities for histological diagnosis by frozen section were not available. Surgery involved total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy. Adjunctive treatment with progestogens was given to two patients (2/10; 10%) with stage 3 and 4 disease. No follow-up data beyond 3 months were available for the patients who had surgery. No mortality data were available for endometrial cancer.

Choriocarcinoma constituted 4.2% (10/236) of all gynecological malignancies. The mean age of patients with choriocarcinoma was 36±6.1 (range 18–45) years. Three cases (30%) followed term pregnancies, two (20%) followed abortions, while five (50%) followed molar pregnancies. The commonest presenting complaints were amenorrhea (100%, 10/10), followed by vaginal bleeding (90%, 9/10), and lower abdominal pain (60%, 6/10). Approximately 10% were in stage 1, 70% in stage 2, and 10% each in stages 3 and 4: the only stage 4 case had pulmonary metastasis. In all cases, diagnosis involved assays of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin. Chemotherapy was the mainstay of treatment for all patients. Twenty percent (2/10) of cases had total abdominal hysterectomy for heavy uncontrollable vaginal bleeding. Chemotherapy regimens used included methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and doxorubicin in combination. There was a record of death for two patients while in hospital, giving a case fatality rate of 20%.

Leiomyosarcoma constituted 1.7% (4/236) of all gynecological malignancies. The mean age of cases of leiomyosarcoma was 58.3±11.5 years. Three cases presented with lower abdominal masses, excessive menstrual flow, and lower abdominal pain, and were diagnosed after histology for uterine fibroids removed during myomectomy and were classified as stage 1 tumors. These patients subsequently underwent total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. The remaining patient had a large lower abdominal mass and severe pain. An inoperable stage 4 tumor was found at laparotomy. The patient had palliative treatment with injectable and oral analgesics, hematinics (excluding folic acid) and antibiotics. Records showed no evidence that any of the cases ever returned after surgery. No mortality or survival data were available for any of the four cases.

Vulvar cancer

There were ten cases of vulvar cancer, constituting 0.15% of all gynecological admissions and 4.2% of all gynecological malignancies. The mean age of cases was 58.7±4.9 (range 52–85) years. The clinicopathological characteristics of the vulvar cancer seen during the study period are summarized in Table 3. In addition to analgesia, antibiotics, and hematinics, patients also had simple or radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy with or without referral for radiotherapy. There was no record of death in the hospital from vulvar cancer. All patients were available for follow-up for not more than 6 months, with two referred for radiotherapy. All patients were apparently lost to follow-up.

Discussion

This study describes the management of gynecological cancers in a major referral hospital for cancer patients in South East Nigeria. In particular, the study highlights the major challenges to gynecological cancer management at the center during the study period.

The study found that the most common gynecological cancers (cervical and ovarian) presented in advanced stages of the diseases, and too late for curative interventions to be undertaken. For instance, most patients who had cervical cancer were offered symptomatic treatment because they presented in advanced stages of the disease. Late presentation is a major challenge to successful treatment of cervical and ovarian cancers in this environment. The late presentation of cervical cancer patients found in this study agrees with previous studies in Nigeria.10–12 Based on earlier reports and anecdotal evidence, late presentation of cervical cancer in developing countries appears to be a multifactorial phenomenon. One factor responsible for this trend is the inability of patients to detect early stages of the disease. This has been ascribed to the absence or poor uptake of the few screening services available.13 Nationally organized screening programs such as those implemented in most Western countries offer the best approach to wider coverage of the population.13 Such national screening programs integrate screening into the health care system and tend to make the population more conscious of the need for screening.13 It is well known that cervical cancer screening not only detects precancerous stages of the disease, but can also detect early stage cancers when cure is theoretically possible.14

Other possible causes of late presentation of gynecological cancers are related to the societal illness behavior in developing countries and the socioeconomic status of women. The illness behavior of many African societies, for instance, is still pervaded by ignorance and rooted in traditional belief systems despite apparent exposure to Western civilization.5 One such belief is that diseases such as cancer are caused by witchcraft or spiritual poisoning by perceived enemies of the patient and that certain diseases are not amenable to orthodox medical care.5 Even when symptoms of early disease are present, many patients would tend to go to spiritualists and herbalists first before seeking orthodox care. Added to these erroneous beliefs is the fact that herbalists offer cheaper care than hospitals and many poor patients would seek cheaper care from herbalists first and resort to orthodox treatment only when this cheaper care fails to give the desired relief.6 Anecdotal evidence suggests that the subordinate roles of women in traditional African societies limit the capacity of women to express themselves, including reporting physical symptoms related to the genital tract or seeking medical attention without the approval of the husband or the husband’s family. Related to the subordinate role of women is the economic disempowerment of women, which results in a lack of financial ability to fund treatment. All these factors contribute to delays in presentation for care in hospital.

With respect to ovarian cancer, late presentation is partly due to the anatomical location of the organ, which is responsible for the nonspecific symptoms of early ovarian cancer.15 Further, early ovarian cancer can be asymptomatic. In the absence of any known premalignant phase of the disease and lack of any effective screening test, the best hope for early detection of ovarian cancer lies with a high index of suspicion facilitated by a high degree of health awareness.16 Such a level of health awareness may not be attainable in many developing countries.

Another finding in this study that represents a formidable hindrance to successful outcomes of treatment for gynecological cancer is the inadequacy, and in some cases nonavailability, of facilities and expertise for proper diagnosis and treatment. This agrees with previous reports from developing countries.5,17 Cancer care is hardly a priority for scarce health care resources in most developing countries as they battle formidable challenges from infectious diseases such as malaria, human immunodeficiency virus, and tuberculosis. In this study, for instance, functioning radiotherapy facilities were not available in the center during the study period. There was no evidence of a trained gynecological oncologist, medical oncologist, or oncology nurses throughout the study period. All those referred to other centers for radiotherapy needed to travel hundreds of kilometers to any of the three cities where radiotherapy facilities were available. Also, CA125 assays could not be done in the center. Cutting edge cytotoxic drugs were not used for chemotherapy, probably because the latest cytotoxic drugs used in Western countries are generally not available or affordable in developing countries. Lack of facilities meant that even when patients with the disease presented early, the full complement of care possible could be unavailable. The high postoperative mortality for ovarian and cervical cancers could be attributable, at least in part, to a lack of appropriate surgical skills and limited intensive care facilities in the center. All these factors clearly militate against successful treatment of gynecological cancer.

Although developments in the last 2 years in the center, such as creation of a gynecological oncology unit and the commencement of some radiotherapy services are positive developments, empirical observation suggests that trained personnel are still very few. There is only one trained gynecological oncologist and one medical oncologist to serve the entire hospital. There are no trained oncology nurses, and intensive care facilities are limited. Although the cancer workload appears small, it is expected that the gynecological oncologist will be able to attract more gynecological cancer patients. This expected increase will help to maintain the skill set of the gynecological oncologist. There still exists a huge unmet need for trained medical oncologists, oncology nurses, radiotherapists, and interventional radiologists. Further, the full complement of radiotherapy for cervical cancer is still unavailable, given that the components required for brachytherapy are not yet installed.

A rather peculiar barrier to successful outcome of cancer care was the finding that many patients abandoned their treatment half-way, in particular chemotherapy. From previous reports, abandonment of treatment could be ascribed to several possible factors, including inability to sustain funding for treatment and inability to source prescribed drugs.5 Also, from anecdotal evidence, it could also be due to disenchantment with therapy due to the lack of clinical improvement following initial treatment or due to inability of patients to tolerate the side effects of cytotoxic drugs. Supportive care for the side effects of chemotherapy could have been hampered by the high cost or lack of cutting edge antiemetics, erythropoietin, and blood transfusion facilities. Abandonment of treatment can be challenging for the care team because it denies them the opportunity to evaluate prescribed treatments and could lead to a sense of frustration and loss of enthusiasm on the part of the care team. Fortunately, most of the postulated factors that lead to abandonment of treatment are modifiable. Whereas the side effects of cytotoxic drugs or perception of clinical progress on the part of patients can be addressed by the managing clinicians through appropriate counseling and use of supportive treatment measures, the high cost and relative unavailability of many cutting edge cytotoxic drugs requires intervention by the government. There is a need to subsidize the cost of these drugs to make them affordable for most of those who need them. Unfortunately, the medical insurance scheme evolving in Nigeria does not include cancer care at present, so patients have to pay out of pocket.

The major strength of this study was the use of a retrospective longitudinal analytical technique that is suitable for evaluation of the presentation and follow-up of management and outcomes of rare diseases like cancer. The major limitations relate to the small number of gynecological cancers treated in the center, suggesting that many gynecological cancer patients probably did not seek treatment at the center. There is a possibility of a referral bias arising from the societal perception that cancer is not curable by orthodox medicine. The small sample size limits the external validity of the findings of this study. Another limitation was the inability to obtain records for all gynecological cancer patients seen in the center, as well as the absence of comprehensive mortality and survival data for all patients. These limit the interpretation of the presented data and also the internal validity of the study findings.

In conclusion, the major challenges to a successful outcome of treatment for gynecological cancer at this center include the late presentation of most cases, poor outcomes of complex gynecological cancer surgery, noncompliance with prescribed treatment regimens, and inadequate facilities for radiotherapy. It is recommended that government should subsidize gynecological cancer care to reduce the cost of investigation and treatment, and perhaps improve compliance with treatment regimens. More training is needed in gynecological cancer surgery for gynecologists in this center and specifically more trained gynecological oncologists are needed. Behavioral change in communication techniques should be deployed through public health campaigns to educate the public on the need to use the few available cancer screening services and to present early for treatment, so as to improve the prognosis of these diseases.