Jeffrey S Dlott1, Roberta A George, Xiaohua Huang, Mouneer Odeh, Harvey W Kaufman, Jack Ansell, Elaine M Hylek. 1. Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, Chantilly, VA (J.S.D.); Quest Diagnostics, West Norriton, PA (R.A.G., X.H.); Quest Diagnostics, Madison, NJ (M.O., H.W.K.); Department of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY (J.A.); and Department of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA (E.M.H.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation control with warfarin, as assessed by the international normalized ratio (INR), is challenging. Time in the therapeutic range has been inversely correlated with major hemorrhage, thrombosis, and mortality. Quest Diagnostics offers standardized INR laboratory testing services to approximately half of US physician practices. To inform national stroke prevention strategies, we evaluated anticoagulation control in office-based community practices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected individuals with ≥2 months of INR data, INR results of >1.2, and an ICD-9 diagnosis code of atrial fibrillation. Frequency of INR testing and time in the therapeutic range were analyzed by age, sex, length of testing period, number of referred patients per provider, and median household income (based on home ZIP code). We identified 138 319 individuals referred by 37 939 physicians, yielding a total of 2 683 674 INR results. Patients had a mean age of 74 years; 81% were ≥65 years of age, and 55% were ≥75 years of age. The mean time in the therapeutic range was 53.7% overall and improved with time on treatment, increasing from 47.6% for patients with <6 months of testing to 57.5% for those with ≥6 months of testing (P<0.0001). The number of patients tested per physician practice was positively associated with time in the therapeutic range. Younger age, female sex, and lower income were also independently associated with poorer anticoagulant control. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates widespread suboptimal anticoagulation control, suggesting an urgent need to improve oral anticoagulation care for most patient segments in the United States.
BACKGROUND: Anticoagulation control with warfarin, as assessed by the international normalized ratio (INR), is challenging. Time in the therapeutic range has been inversely correlated with major hemorrhage, thrombosis, and mortality. Quest Diagnostics offers standardized INR laboratory testing services to approximately half of US physician practices. To inform national stroke prevention strategies, we evaluated anticoagulation control in office-based community practices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We selected individuals with ≥2 months of INR data, INR results of >1.2, and an ICD-9 diagnosis code of atrial fibrillation. Frequency of INR testing and time in the therapeutic range were analyzed by age, sex, length of testing period, number of referred patients per provider, and median household income (based on home ZIP code). We identified 138 319 individuals referred by 37 939 physicians, yielding a total of 2 683 674 INR results. Patients had a mean age of 74 years; 81% were ≥65 years of age, and 55% were ≥75 years of age. The mean time in the therapeutic range was 53.7% overall and improved with time on treatment, increasing from 47.6% for patients with <6 months of testing to 57.5% for those with ≥6 months of testing (P<0.0001). The number of patients tested per physician practice was positively associated with time in the therapeutic range. Younger age, female sex, and lower income were also independently associated with poorer anticoagulant control. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates widespread suboptimal anticoagulation control, suggesting an urgent need to improve oral anticoagulation care for most patient segments in the United States.
Authors: Akash Kataruka; Xiaowen Kong; Brian Haymart; Eva Kline-Rogers; Steve Almany; Jay Kozlowski; Gregory D Krol; Scott Kaatz; Michael W McNamara; James B Froehlich; Geoffrey D Barnes Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Felix Yang; Jessica A Hellyer; Claire Than; Aditya J Ullal; Daniel W Kaiser; Paul A Heidenreich; Donald D Hoang; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Susan Schmitt; Susan M Frayne; Ciaran S Phibbs; Mintu P Turakhia Journal: Heart Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Nicolae Done; Amanda M Roy; Yingzhe Yuan; Steven D Pizer; Adam J Rose; Julia C Prentice Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-11 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Malini Madhavan; Tiffany Y Hu; Bernard J Gersh; Veronique L Roger; Jill Killian; Susan A Weston; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Samuel J Asirvatham; Alanna M Chamberlain Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2018-01-09 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2018-11-27