Literature DB >> 24493512

Innovative designs for the smart ICU: part 1: from initial thoughts to occupancy.

Neil A Halpern1.   

Abstract

Designing a smart ICU is a time-consuming, complex, multiphased, political, and costly exercise. This process begins with two notions: First, all hospital parties agree that a new or renovated ICU is required, and second, the hospital has agreed to allocate space, personnel, and fiscal resources for the project. In this first of a three-part series on innovative designs for the smart ICU, we will explore the roles of the ICU design team in managing the design process. The team must be administratively empowered, knowledgeable, and forward thinking. The first charge of the design team is to develop a clear vision for the goals, look and feel, and functionality of the new ICU. This vision must be guided by the imperative to positively impact patients, staff, and visitors. The team must concentrate on innovative but practical ideas that are in compliance with building codes and design guidelines and address issues related to renovation vs new construction. Mock-ups, both physical and computer generated, and a simulation laboratory for advanced technologies should be used to test design assumptions and reveal problems well in advance of actual ICU construction and technology implementation. Technology platforms need to be standardized within the ICU and equipment purchases protected against early obsolescence. The ramifications and expectations of the new ICU must be thoughtfully considered and dealt with during the design process. Last, it is essential that the design group continue its involvement in the new ICU during construction, occupancy, and post occupancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24493512     DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  6 in total

1.  The Location and Timing of Failure-to-Rescue Events Across a Statewide Trauma System.

Authors:  Catherine E Sharoky; Niels D Martin; Brian P Smith; Jose L Pascual; Lewis J Kaplan; Patrick M Reilly; Daniel N Holena
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 2.  Critical Care Medicine Beds, Use, Occupancy, and Costs in the United States: A Methodological Review.

Authors:  Neil A Halpern; Stephen M Pastores
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Keeping a 2009 Design Award-Winning Intensive Care Unit Current: A 13-Year Case Study.

Authors:  Neil A Halpern; Diana C Anderson
Journal:  HERD       Date:  2020-05-26

4.  Creation of an Evidence-Based Implementation Framework for Digital Health Technology in the Intensive Care Unit: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lina Katharina Mosch; Akira-Sebastian Poncette; Claudia Spies; Steffen Weber-Carstens; Monique Schieler; Henning Krampe; Felix Balzer
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-08

5.  Does the architectural layout of a NICU affect alarm pressure? A comparative clinical audit of a single-family room and an open bay area NICU using a retrospective study design.

Authors:  Rohan Joshi; Henrica van Straaten; Heidi van de Mortel; Xi Long; Peter Andriessen; Carola van Pul
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine Experts Committee Consensus Statement on ICU Planning and Designing, 2020.

Authors:  Narendra Rungta; Kapil Gangadhar Zirpe; Subhal B Dixit; Yatin Mehta; Dhruva Chaudhry; Deepak Govil; Rajesh C Mishra; Jeetendra Sharma; Pravin Amin; B K Rao; G C Khilnani; Kundan Mittal; Pradip Kumar Bhattacharya; A K Baronia; Yash Javeri; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Neena Rungta; Ranvir Tyagi; Sanjay Dhanuka; Mahesh Mishra; Srinivas Samavedam
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.