Literature DB >> 2449332

Factors that limit the use of flash visual evoked potentials for surgical monitoring.

C Cedzich1, J Schramm, C F Mengedoht, R Fahlbusch.   

Abstract

A study was conducted comparing the incidence with which the N2/P2/N3 was obtained after flash VEP in 3 groups: anterior visual pathway lesions, non-tumor craniotomies and non-cranial surgery. These groups allowed evaluation of the effects of anesthesia, visual pathway lesions and craniotomy on the stability of the flash VEP. It was found that the latency was not significantly affected in the 3 groups, whereas the incidence of obtainable peaks and the amplitudes were adversely affected by anesthesia, cranial surgical manipulation and especially by the presence of a visual pathway lesion. These adverse effects were so marked that the application of flash VEP for intraoperative monitoring seems of little use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2449332     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(88)90072-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  13 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials during the early phase of optic nerve compression in the orbital cavity.

Authors:  M Janáky; G Benedek
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Visual evoked potential monitoring of optic nerve function during surgery.

Authors:  G F Harding; J D Bland; V H Smith
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Fourier transformed steady-state flash evoked potentials for continuous monitoring of visual pathway function.

Authors:  R Bergholz; T N Lehmann; G Fritz; K Rüther
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Optic nerve potentials and cortical potentials after stimulation of the anterior visual pathway during neurosurgery.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring during an optic nerve schwannoma removal.

Authors:  Daniel San-Juan; Manuel Escanio Cortés; Martha Tena-Suck; Adolfo Josué Orozco Garduño; Jesús Alejandro López Pizano; Jonathan Villanueva Domínguez; Maricarmen Fernández Gónzalez-Aragón; Juan Luis Gómez-Amador
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Cortical potentials after electrical intraneural stimulation of the optic nerve during orbital enucleation.

Authors:  Mitja Benedičič; Matej Beltram; Brigita Drnovšek Olup; Roman Bošnjak
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Detection of ischemia in endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms: a perspective in the era of neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Lukui Chen; Robert F Spetzler; Cameron G McDougall; Felipe C Albuquerque; Bainan Xu
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Effectiveness of intraoperative visual evoked potential in avoiding visual deterioration during endonasal transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors.

Authors:  Kentaro Toyama; Masahiko Wanibuchi; Toshimi Honma; Katsuya Komatsu; Yukinori Akiyama; Takeshi Mikami; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 9.  Neurophysiologic monitoring during cranial base surgery.

Authors:  M T Stechison
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.130

10.  Detection of ischemia in endovascular therapy of cerebral aneurysms: a perspective in the era of neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Lukui Chen
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.