Literature DB >> 24493195

Uncemented, custom-made, hydroxyapatite-coated collared distal femoral endoprostheses: up to 18 years' follow-up.

V Batta1, M J Coathup, M T Parratt, R C Pollock, W J Aston, S R Cannon, J A Skinner, T W Briggs, G W Blunn.   

Abstract

We reviewed the outcome of 69 uncemented, custom-made, distal femoral endoprosthetic replacements performed in 69 patients between 1994 and 2006. There were 31 women and 38 men with a mean age at implantation of 16.5 years (5 to 37). All procedures were performed for primary malignant bone tumours of the distal femur. At a mean follow-up of 124.2 months (4 to 212), 53 patients were alive, with one patient lost to follow-up. All nine implants (13.0%) were revised due to aseptic loosening at a mean of 52 months (8 to 91); three implants (4.3%) were revised due to fracture of the shaft of the prosthesis and three patients (4.3%) had a peri-prosthetic fracture. Bone remodelling associated with periosteal cortical thinning adjacent to the uncemented intramedullary stem was seen in 24 patients but this did not predispose to failure. All aseptically loose implants in this series were diagnosed to be loose within the first five years. The results from this study suggest that custom-made uncemented distal femur replacements have a higher rate of aseptic loosening compared to published results for this design when used with cemented fixation. Loosening of uncemented replacements occurs early indicating that initial fixation of the implant is crucial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone tumour; Hydroxyapatite; Limb salvage; Massive endoprosthesis; Survivorship; Uncemented

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24493195     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B2.32091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  17 in total

1.  Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Patrick Thornley; Matias Vicente; Austin MacDonald; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert; Roberto Velez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hydroxyapatite-coated collars reduce radiolucent line progression in cemented distal femoral bone tumor implants.

Authors:  Melanie J Coathup; Anish Sanghrajka; William J Aston; Panagiotis D Gikas; Robin C Pollock; Stephen R Cannon; John A Skinner; Timothy W R Briggs; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee.

Authors:  Chunlin Zhang; Jianping Hu; Kunpeng Zhu; Tao Cai; Xiaolong Ma
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Non-cemented modular prosthetic reconstruction for bone defect after tumor resection in lower extremities].

Authors:  Yuan Li; Hairong Xu; Huachao Shan; Yang Sun; Zhen Huang; Xiaohui Niu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-15

5.  Finn/Orthopaedic Salvage System Distal Femoral Rotating-Hinge Megaprostheses in Oncologic Patients: Long-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Amputations.

Authors:  Koichi Ogura; Mohamed A Yakoub; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Distal femoral replacement with the MML system: a single center experience with an average follow-up of 86 months.

Authors:  Andreas Toepfer; Norbert Harrasser; Paul-Ruben Schwarz; Florian Pohlig; Ulrich Lenze; Heinrich M L Mühlhofer; Ludger Gerdesmeyer; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Christian Suren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Distal femoral replacement - Cemented or cementless? Current concepts and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alexander B Christ; Francis J Hornicek; Nicola Fabbri
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-08

8.  Long-term competing risks for overall and cause-specific failure of rotating-hinge distal femoral arthroplasty for tumour reconstruction.

Authors:  Koichi Ogura; Tomohiro Fujiwara; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; John H Healey
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.385

9.  What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS® Modular Endoprostheses for Reconstruction of Tumor Resection of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia?

Authors:  Michaël P A Bus; Michiel A J van de Sande; Marta Fiocco; Gerard R Schaap; Jos A M Bramer; P D Sander Dijkstra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Uncemented, curved, short endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction: early follow-up outcomes.

Authors:  Minxun Lu; Jie Wang; Cong Xiao; Fan Tang; Li Min; Yong Zhou; Wenli Zhang; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.