Literature DB >> 24492407

Assessment of upper esophageal sphincter function on high-resolution manometry: identification of predictors of globus symptoms.

Lihua Peng1, Amit Patel, Vladimir Kushnir, C Prakash Gyawali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globus is commonly encountered in clinical practice, but high-resolution manometry (HRM) characteristics are incompletely characterized. We evaluated HRM metrics in globus subjects, compared with age-matched and sex-matched dysphagia subjects and healthy controls. STUDY: Twenty-four subjects with globus (53.3 ± 2.3 y, 58% female) were compared with 24 age-matched and sex-matched subjects with nonobstructive dysphagia (52.5 ± 2.5 y, 58% female), and 21 healthy controls (27.6 ± 0.6 y, 52% female). Sphincter and segment anatomy, and pressure volume metrics assessed skeletal (proximal contractile integral) and smooth muscle contraction (distal contractile integral). Parameters significantly different across groups on univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic analysis to identify HRM predictors of globus.
RESULTS: Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) postswallow residual pressures were highest in globus (2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 0.5 mm Hg in dysphagia and 0.6 ± 0.6 mm Hg in controls, P = 0.03); 66.7% had recordable UES residual pressure, in contrast to 9.5% of controls, and 37.5% of dysphagia patients (P = 0.0002). Although different from controls, UES length and basal pressure, and segment 1 parameters did not differ from dysphagia controls. In a multivariate model, measurable UES residual pressure (odds ratio, 6.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.79-25.96) independently predicted globus. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis identified a threshold of 0.4 mm Hg UES residual pressure in segregating globus (sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 71.5%, positive predictive value 55.2%, and negative predictive value 80.0%).
CONCLUSION: HRM with measurement of UES residual pressure allows objective assessment of patients with globus sensation, and has potential to complement current diagnostic strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24492407      PMCID: PMC4117818          DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  17 in total

1.  Value of preoperative esophageal function studies before laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Authors:  Walter W Chan; Laura R Haroian; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Globus pharyngis: development of a symptom assessment scale.

Authors:  I J Deary; J A Wilson; M B Harris; G MacDougall
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Effect of age on proximal esophageal response to swallowing.

Authors:  Roberto Oliveira Dantas; Leda Maria Tavares Alves; Juciléia Dalmazo; Carla Manfredi dos Santos; Rachel de Aguiar Cassiani; Weslania Viviane do Nascimento
Journal:  Arq Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec

4.  The effects of age, sex, and smoking on normal pharyngoesophageal motility.

Authors:  J A Wilson; A Pryde; C C Macintyre; A G Maran; R C Heading
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Upper esophageal sphincter tone and reactivity to stress in patients with a history of globus sensation.

Authors:  I J Cook; J Dent; S M Collins
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Analysis of intersegmental trough and proximal latency of smooth muscle contraction using high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Nitin Kumar; Ryan F Porter; Jake M Chanin; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Study on the function of pharynx upper esophageal sphincter in globus hystericus.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Bin Xu; Yao-Zong Yuan; Jia-Yu Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Transition zone defect associated with the response to proton pump inhibitor treatment in patients with globus sensation.

Authors:  Min Seok Han; Hyuk Lee; Jung Hyun Jo; In Rae Cho; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  High incidence of esophageal motor disorders in consecutive patients with globus sensation.

Authors:  G Moser; G V Vacariu-Granser; C Schneider; T A Abatzi; P Pokieser; G Stacher-Janotta; G Gaupmann; U Weber; T Wenzel; M Roden
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Globus sensation: pharyngoesophageal function, psychometric and psychiatric findings, and follow-up in 88 patients.

Authors:  G Moser; T A Wenzel-Abatzi; M Stelzeneder; T Wenzel; U Weber; S Wiesnagrotzki; C Schneider; W Schima; G Stacher-Janotta; G V Vacariu-Granser; P Pokieser; H Bergmann; G Stacher
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-06-22
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Assessing Upper Esophageal Sphincter Function in Clinical Practice: a Primer.

Authors:  Nitin K Ahuja; Walter W Chan
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-02

2.  Potential for Volitional Control of Resting Pressure at the Upper Oesophageal Sphincter in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Katharina Winiker; Kristin Gozdzikowska; Esther Guiu Hernandez; Seh Ling Kwong; Phoebe Macrae; Maggie-Lee Huckabee
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 3.  Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Applications and Limits in Adults and Pediatric Patients with Esophageal Symptoms.

Authors:  Kornilia Nikaki; Joanne Li Shen Ooi; Daniel Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-11

Review 4.  Globus pharyngeus: a review of etiology, diagnostics, and treatment.

Authors:  Pia Järvenpää; Perttu Arkkila; Leena-Maija Aaltonen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Oropharyngeal dysphagia: manifestations and diagnosis.

Authors:  Nathalie Rommel; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Optimizing the high-resolution manometry (HRM) study protocol.

Authors:  A Patel; A Ding; F Mirza; C P Gyawali
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Accuracy of High-Resolution Pharyngeal Manometry Metrics for Predicting Aspiration and Residue in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Patients with Poor Pharyngeal Contractility.

Authors:  Howell Henrian G Bayona; Nicole Pizzorni; Jan Tack; Ann Goeleven; Taher Omari; Nathalie Rommel
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 8.  The upper esophageal sphincter in the high-resolution manometry era.

Authors:  Pedro Norton; Fernando A M Herbella; Francisco Schlottmann; Marco G Patti
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Treatment implications of high-resolution manometry findings: options for patients with esophageal dysmotility.

Authors:  Ahmed Bolkhir; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03

10.  High-Resolution Manometry in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.