Literature DB >> 24492076

Mapping odor valence in the brain of flies and mice.

Markus Knaden1, Bill S Hansson2.   

Abstract

Why are some odors perceived as pleasant while others are not? We review current research on how pleasant and unpleasant odors, that is, odors with positive or negative valence, are processed in the brain of flies and mice. We conclude that in mice pleasant and unpleasant odors are detected via three olfactory subsystems with only one being fully dedicated to unpleasant odors, while the others detect both good and bad odors. Correspondingly, so far no clear segmentation into regions processing exclusively pleasant or unpleasant odors has been identified in the mouse brain. The situation is different in flies, where most odors are sensed via the antenna. Already at the antennal lobe level, that is, the first processing center for olfactory input, odorants seem to be categorized as pleasant or unpleasant. We furthermore discuss why animals at all should make a decision based on olfaction, and why a straightforward and fast processing of odorant valence might be important for survival and reproduction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24492076     DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2013.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  18 in total

Review 1.  The good, the bad, and the hungry: how the central brain codes odor valence to facilitate food approach in Drosophila.

Authors:  Silke Sachse; Jennifer Beshel
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Experience-Dependent c-Fos Expression in the Mediodorsal Thalamus Varies With Chemosensory Modality.

Authors:  Kelly E Fredericksen; Kelsey A McQueen; Chad L Samuelsen
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Signaling Mode of the Broad-Spectrum Conserved CO2 Receptor Is One of the Important Determinants of Odor Valence in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dyan MacWilliam; Joel Kowalewski; Arun Kumar; Crystal Pontrello; Anandasankar Ray
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  A Single Set of Interneurons Drives Opposite Behaviors in C. elegans.

Authors:  Manon L Guillermin; Mayra A Carrillo; Elissa A Hallem
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Organization of the parallel antennal-lobe tracts in the moth.

Authors:  Jonas Hansen Kymre; Xi Chu; Elena Ian; Bente Gunnveig Berg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.389

6.  A Neural System that Represents the Association of Odors with Rewarded Outcomes and Promotes Behavioral Engagement.

Authors:  Marie A Gadziola; Lucas A Stetzik; Katherine N Wright; Adrianna J Milton; Keiko Arakawa; María Del Mar Cortijo; Daniel W Wesson
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Valence of social information is encoded in different subpopulations of mushroom body Kenyon cells in the honeybee brain.

Authors:  Ian M Traniello; Zhenqing Chen; Vikram A Bagchi; Gene E Robinson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Behavioral responses to odors from other species: introducing a complementary model of allelochemics involving vertebrates.

Authors:  Birte L Nielsen; Olivier Rampin; Nicolas Meunier; Vincent Bombail
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Functional and anatomical specificity in a higher olfactory centre.

Authors:  Shahar Frechter; Alexander Shakeel Bates; Sina Tootoonian; Michael-John Dolan; James Manton; Arian Rokkum Jamasb; Johannes Kohl; Davi Bock; Gregory Jefferis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Drosophila Avoids Parasitoids by Sensing Their Semiochemicals via a Dedicated Olfactory Circuit.

Authors:  Shimaa A M Ebrahim; Hany K M Dweck; Johannes Stökl; John E Hofferberth; Federica Trona; Kerstin Weniger; Jürgen Rybak; Yoichi Seki; Marcus C Stensmyr; Silke Sachse; Bill S Hansson; Markus Knaden
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.