Literature DB >> 24492025

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms isolated from patients hospitalized in intensive care units in United States and European hospitals (2009-2011).

Helio S Sader1, David J Farrell2, Robert K Flamm2, Ronald N Jones2.   

Abstract

Treatment of infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) represents a great challenge, especially those caused by Gram-negative organisms. Rapid introduction of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is crucial to reduce mortality; resistance rates in the ICU can be elevated due to antimicrobial selection pressure. We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients hospitalized in ICUs (ICU patients). The isolates were consecutively collected as part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program from January 2009 to December 2011 and tested for susceptibility to multiple antimicrobial agents at a central laboratory by reference broth microdilution methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility results for 5989 bacterial isolates from ICU patients (3445 from the United States [USA] and 2544 from Europe [EU]) were analyzed and compared to those of 17,244 organisms from non-ICU patients (9271 from USA and 7973 from EU). Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most frequently isolated organisms from ICU patients, followed by Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Haemophilus influenzae, Acinetobacter spp., and Proteus mirabilis. Susceptibility rates were generally lower among ICU isolates compared to non-ICU organisms. E. coli isolates from ICU patients exhibited elevated extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-phenotype rates (13.7% in USA and 16.6% in EU); furthermore, only amikacin (90.5-94.8% susceptibility), colistin (99.8-100.0% inhibited at ≤2 μg/mL), imipenem (95.5-96.0%), meropenem (95.4-95.8%), and tigecycline (96.3-98.0%) exhibited good activity against Klebsiella spp. ESBL-phenotype rates have increased among both E. coli and Klebsiella spp. from ICU patients in the USA and in Europe, with the most noticeable increase among Klebsiella spp. from Europe (from 27.5% in 2009 to 41.8% in 2011; P = 0.015 and odds ratio = 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.18]). Meropenem susceptibility among Klebsiella spp. improved slightly in the USA but decreased markedly in Europe from 100.0% in 2009 to 89.7% in 2011. Only colistin (99.4% susceptible) and amikacin (97.3% in USA and 84.9% in EU) exhibited good activity against P. aeruginosa strains from ICU patients. The greatest differences in susceptibility rates between P. aeruginosa strains from ICU and non-ICU patients were observed for the anti-pseudomonal β-lactams, such as ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam. The results of this study (101 medical centers) highlight major antimicrobial coverage problems and trends in antimicrobial resistance for USA and EU ICU patient isolates.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Gram-negative pathogens; Intensive care units

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24492025     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  72 in total

1.  Colistin resistance in Enterobacter spp. isolates in Korea.

Authors:  Yoon-Kyoung Hong; Ji-Young Lee; Kwan Soo Ko
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  Changes in bacterial epidemiology and antibiotic resistance among veterans with spinal cord injury/disorder over the past 9 years.

Authors:  Margaret A Fitzpatrick; Katie J Suda; Nasia Safdar; Stephen P Burns; Makoto M Jones; Linda Poggensee; Swetha Ramanathan; Charlesnika T Evans
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Hypermutator Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exploits Multiple Genetic Pathways To Develop Multidrug Resistance during Long-Term Infections in the Airways of Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  C A Colque; A G Albarracín Orio; S Feliziani; R L Marvig; A R Tobares; H K Johansen; S Molin; A M Smania
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  What is new in the use of aminoglycosides in critically ill patients?

Authors:  Dimitrios K Matthaiou; Jan De Waele; George Dimopoulos
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Antimicrobial resistance in hospital-acquired gram-negative bacterial infections.

Authors:  Borna Mehrad; Nina M Clark; George G Zhanel; Joseph P Lynch
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Development of new polymyxin derivatives for multi-drug resistant Gram-negative infections.

Authors:  Pamela Brown; Michael J Dawson
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Should we take into account ESBLs in empirical antibiotic treatment?

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Jesús Rodríguez-Baño
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Dynamic In Vitro Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.

Authors:  Aaron J Heffernan; Fekade B Sime; Derek S Sarovich; Michael Neely; Yarmarly Guerra-Valero; Saiyuri Naicker; Kyra Cottrell; Patrick Harris; Katherine T Andrews; David Ellwood; Steven C Wallis; Jeffrey Lipman; Keith Grimwood; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Intensive Care Units in the United States: a Potential Role for New β-Lactam Combination Agents.

Authors:  Tomefa E Asempa; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Marvelous but Morbid: Infective endocarditis due to Serratia marcescens.

Authors:  Varun K Phadke; Jesse T Jacob
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md)       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.