Literature DB >> 24491982

Research methodology in recurrent pregnancy loss.

Ole B Christiansen1.   

Abstract

The aim of this article is to highlight pitfalls in research methodology that may explain why studies in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) often provide very divergent results. It is hoped that insight into this issue may help clinicians decide which published studies are the most valid. It may help researchers to eliminate methodological flaws in future studies, which may hopefully come to some kind of agreement about the usefulness of diagnostic tests and treatments in RPL.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical research; Methodological flaws; Recurrent miscarriage; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Research studies

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24491982     DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8545            Impact factor:   2.844


  2 in total

1.  The role of FAS, FAS-L, BAX, and BCL-2 gene polymorphisms in determining susceptibility to unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Rafael Tomoya Michita; Francis Maria Báo Zambra; Lucas Rosa Fraga; Maria Teresa Sanseverino; Lavínia Schuler-Faccini; José Artur Bogo Chies; Priscila Vianna
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  CD91 Derived Treg Epitope Modulates Regulatory T Lymphocyte Response, Regulates Expression of Costimulatory Molecules on Antigen-Presenting Cells, and Rescues Pregnancy in Mouse Pregnancy Loss Model.

Authors:  Anna Ewa Kedzierska; Daria Lorek; Anna Slawek; Tomasz Grabowski; Anna Chelmonska-Soyta
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.