| Literature DB >> 24491982 |
Abstract
The aim of this article is to highlight pitfalls in research methodology that may explain why studies in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) often provide very divergent results. It is hoped that insight into this issue may help clinicians decide which published studies are the most valid. It may help researchers to eliminate methodological flaws in future studies, which may hopefully come to some kind of agreement about the usefulness of diagnostic tests and treatments in RPL.Entities:
Keywords: Medical research; Methodological flaws; Recurrent miscarriage; Recurrent pregnancy loss; Research studies
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24491982 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am ISSN: 0889-8545 Impact factor: 2.844