Literature DB >> 24491499

Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.

Lilia F Brinca1, Ana Paula F Batista2, Ana Inês Tavares2, Ilídio C Gonçalves3, Maria L Moreno3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the use of cepstral peak prominence (CPP) and CPP-smoothed (CPPs) to differentiate dysphonic from nondysphonic voices, using two speech tasks: sustained vowel /a/ and connected speech. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective study was based on data selected from an archival database of recorded voices.
METHODS: Sixty age- and occupation-matched individuals (30 participants with dysphonia and 30 controls) were recorded producing the sustained vowel /a/ and reading the European Portuguese version of "The Story of Arthur the Rat." Recorded voices were analyzed acoustically by measuring CPP and CPPs and auditory-perceptual ratings were related to the acoustic measurements.
RESULTS: For the sustained vowel, both CPP and CPPs measures were significantly different between dysphonic and control groups. For connected speech, only CPP values revealed significant differences between the two groups, both in direct and narrative speech. Acoustic measurements correlated with the auditory-perceptual classifications in both sustained vowel and connected speech, although the strongest correlation (0.6 < r < 0.7) was obtained between CPP and the perception of breathiness.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that analysis of CPP and CPPs is a promising tool in clinical practice with European Portuguese speakers.
Copyright © 2014 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory-perceptual rating; Cepstral analysis; Connected speech; Dysphonia; Female; Sustained vowel

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24491499     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  6 in total

1.  Cepstral Peak Sensitivity: A Theoretic Analysis and Comparison of Several Implementations.

Authors:  Mark D Skowronski; Rahul Shrivastav; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  Individual Monitoring of Vocal Effort With Relative Fundamental Frequency: Relationships With Aerodynamics and Listener Perception.

Authors:  Yu-An S Lien; Carolyn M Michener; Tanya L Eadie; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Relationship of cepstral analysis with voice self-assessments in dysphonic and normal speakers.

Authors:  Saeed Saeedi; Mahshid Aghajanzadeh; Seyyedeh Maryam Khoddami; Payman Dabirmoghaddam; Shohreh Jalaie
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.236

4.  Cepstral analysis in patients with a vocal fold motility impairment: advantages of the cepstrum over time-based acoustic analysis.

Authors:  Beatriz Delgado-Vargas; Leticia Acle-Cervera; Lorena Sánz-López; Mireya Bonet-Loscertales; Narcisa Pérez-Naranjo; Patricia Fuentes-Navajo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Jarrad H Van Stan; Marilia Carvalho Sampaio; Joerg E Bohlender; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Acoustic Analysis of Phonation in Children With Smith-Magenis Syndrome.

Authors:  Irene Hidalgo-De la Guía; Elena Garayzábal-Heinze; Pedro Gómez-Vilda; Rafael Martínez-Olalla; Daniel Palacios-Alonso
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.