STUDY QUESTION: What are the analytical and clinical validity and the clinical utility of in vitro screening of embryos by whole-genome sequencing? SUMMARY ANSWER: At present there are still many limitations in terms of analytical and clinical validity and utility and many ethical questions remain. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Whole-genome sequencing of IVF/ICSI embryos is technically possible. Many loss-of-function mutations exist in the general population without serious effects on the phenotype of the individual. Moreover, annotations of genes and the reference genome are still not 100% correct. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We used publicly available samples from the 1000 Genomes project and Complete Genomics, together with 42 samples from in-house research samples of parents from trios to investigate the presence of loss-of-function mutations in healthy individuals. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the samples, we looked for mutations in genes that are associated with a selection of severe Mendelian disorders with a known molecular basis. We looked for mutations predicted to be damaging by PolyPhen and SIFT and for mutations annotated as disease causing in Human Genome Mutation Database (HGMD). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: More than 40% of individuals who can be considered healthy have mutations that are predicted to be damaging in genes associated with severe Mendelian disorders or are annotated as disease causing. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The analysis relies on current knowledge and databases are continuously updated to reflect our increasing knowledge about the genome. In the process of our analysis several updates were already made. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: At this moment it is not advisable to use whole-genome sequencing as a tool to set up health profiles to select embryos for transfer. We also raise some ethical questions that have to be addressed before this technology can be used for embryo selection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
STUDY QUESTION: What are the analytical and clinical validity and the clinical utility of in vitro screening of embryos by whole-genome sequencing? SUMMARY ANSWER: At present there are still many limitations in terms of analytical and clinical validity and utility and many ethical questions remain. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Whole-genome sequencing of IVF/ICSI embryos is technically possible. Many loss-of-function mutations exist in the general population without serious effects on the phenotype of the individual. Moreover, annotations of genes and the reference genome are still not 100% correct. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We used publicly available samples from the 1000 Genomes project and Complete Genomics, together with 42 samples from in-house research samples of parents from trios to investigate the presence of loss-of-function mutations in healthy individuals. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the samples, we looked for mutations in genes that are associated with a selection of severe Mendelian disorders with a known molecular basis. We looked for mutations predicted to be damaging by PolyPhen and SIFT and for mutations annotated as disease causing in Human Genome Mutation Database (HGMD). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: More than 40% of individuals who can be considered healthy have mutations that are predicted to be damaging in genes associated with severe Mendelian disorders or are annotated as disease causing. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The analysis relies on current knowledge and databases are continuously updated to reflect our increasing knowledge about the genome. In the process of our analysis several updates were already made. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: At this moment it is not advisable to use whole-genome sequencing as a tool to set up health profiles to select embryos for transfer. We also raise some ethical questions that have to be addressed before this technology can be used for embryo selection. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Authors: Julian A Gingold; Joseph A Lee; Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Michael C Whitehouse; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Tanmoy Mukherjee; Alan B Copperman Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-06-13 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Nicholas M Murphy; Tanya S Samarasekera; Lisa Macaskill; Jayne Mullen; Luk J F Rombauts Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 4.379