| Literature DB >> 24491224 |
Adriana Cabal, Mark Strunk, José Domínguez, María Antonia Lezcano, María Asunción Vitoria, Miguel Ferrero, Carlos Martín, María José Iglesias, Sofía Samper1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Different polymorphisms have been described as markers to classify the lineages of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. The analysis of nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) was used to describe seven SNPs cluster groups (SCGs). We attempted to classify those strains that could not been categorized into lineages by the genotyping methods used in the routine testing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24491224 PMCID: PMC3922597 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Description of the 173 isolates of 2010 in Aragon analysed in this study
| AFRICANUM | AFRI_1 | 1 | 1 (0.57%) | 1 | 1 (0.99%) | 1 | 1 (1.33%) |
| BEIJING | BEIJING | 1 | 1 (0.57%) | 1 | 1 (0.99%) | 1 | 1 (1.33%) |
| BOVIS | BOVIS1 | 1 | 3 (1.7%) | 1 | 3 (2.97%) | 1 | 2 (2.66%) |
| BOVIS1_BCG | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| CAS | CAS | 2 | 2 (1.25%) | 1 | 1 (0.99%) | 1 | 1 (1.33%) |
| EAI | EAI7_BGD2 | 1 | 1 (0.57%) | 1 | 1 (0.99%) | 1 | 1 (1.33%) |
| HAARLEM | H1 | 15 | 41 (23.6%) | 7 | 25 (24.75%) | 6 | 15 (20%) |
| H2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| H3 | 19 | 15 | 7 | ||||
| H3-T3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| LAM | LAM1 | 1 | 24 (13.8%) | 1 | 17 (16.83%) | 1 | 10 (13.33%) |
| LAM10_CAM | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| LAM12_MAD1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| LAM2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
| LAM3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| LAM9 | 12 | 7 | 5 | ||||
| S | S | 4 | 4 (2.31%) | 3 | 3 (2.97%) | 2 | 2 (2.66%) |
| X | X1 | 3 | 5 (1.15%) | 1 | 2 (1.98%) | 1 | 2 (2.66%) |
| X2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| T | T1 | 27 | 34 (19.6%) | 12 | 16 (15.84%) | 9 | 13 (17.33%) |
| T2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| T4_CEU1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| T5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| T5_MAD2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| U | U | 24 | 26 (15.0%) | 10 | 12 (11.88%) | 7 | 9 (12.00%) |
| U (LAM3?) | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| No family | NO SIT | 31 | 31 (17.9%) | 19 | 19 (18.81%) | 18 | 18 (24.00%) |
Base detected at SNPs by pyrosequencing, SCGs and PGGs
| G | C | A | G | T | C | C | G | C | 1 | 2 |
| G | C | C | G | T | C | C | G | C | 1 | 3a |
| G | C | C | G | T | C | C | G | C | 2 | 3b |
| G | C | C | T | T | C | Ca | Ga | C | 2 | 3c |
| G | C | C | T | T | C | Aa | Ga | C | 2 | 4 |
| G | C | C | G | T | C | C | C | C | 2 | 5 |
| A | C | C | G | T | C | C | C | G | 3 | 6a |
| A | C | C | G | G | C | C | C | G | 3 | 6b |
| G | T | C | G | T | G | C | G | C | 1 | 7 |
| G | C | C | G | T | G | C | G | C | 1 | 1 |
| A | C | C | G | T | C | C | G | G | 3 | 6c* |
Table adapted from Bouakaze and co-workers [15] and ainferred from Filliol and coworkers [16]. *New pattern SCG-6c.
Figure 1Pyrograms obtained for different sample assays. Pyrograms of possible SNP combinations and interpretation for each of the 4 mixed reactions and for the single reactions for detect the gyrA polymorphism are shown.
SNP location, primers and PCR designed for pyrosequencing analysis
| 1977 | Multiplex 1 | 131 | [M13] - TGAGAAGCTCTACGGTTGTTGTTCG | TTTCACCTCACGATGAGTTCGATCC | |
| (Rv0001:Rv0002) | |||||
| Rv0260c | 311613 | 114 | CACCACTGTTGCCACGATGTTCTT | [M13] - GGCGACTTGCTACGCGTCCTAC | |
| 74092 | Multiplex 2 | 88 | [M13] - GACGGTCCGAATTGCCTTGG | GACCAGGAGAAGGCCATCAAAGAG | |
| 913274 | 141 | GCAATCGCCGTGCAACC | [M13] - CTGCATGTTATGGGTGACGATGAC | ||
| Rv0095c | 105139 | Multiplex 3 | 94 | ATAACGTCGGGCACTGACAAAGAG | [M13]-TCCCGTATCAACTCGTAGGATCTGG |
| Rv0197 | 232574 | 81 | CCACGGCGGGGACAAGAT | [M13] -AGAAAGGCGCCGCTGTAGG | |
| 2460626 | Multiplex 4 | 120 | [M13] - GGGCTCGCAGCCAGACTTC | ATGATCACGGCGACCCAGAC | |
| 3352929 | 108 | [M13] - TCGACGTCCGGGTAGCATTC | GCGTCGCAAGCATCTGACATT | ||
| codon 95 | Simplex | 320 | CAGCTACATCGACTATGCGA | [M13] - GGGCTTCGGTGTACCTCAT | |
| | | | | | |
| [M13]: CGCCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGAC | |||||
aGene name and SNP location in M. tuberculosis H37Rv genome map (http://tuberculist.epfl.ch/). One gene is listed when SNP location is situated in that gene and two genes are listed when SNP is intergenic.
bPCR name, amplicon expected size, and primers used.
Figure 2Dendrogram based on the spoligotypes of the complex strains studied. SIT–shared international type, SCG and PGG are detailed. In one isolate a deletion was detected in the DR locus reflected in a negative spoligotype results.
Classification of the 75 clinical isolates analyzed according to PGG and SCG
| 2 | 1 | 1 | | | | | | | 3 | 7 | |
| | | | 27 | 2 | 23 | | | | | 52 | |
| | | | | | | 14 | * | 2 | | 16 | |
*Reference strain H37Rv. **New SCG subgroup reported.
Figure 3Phylogenetic tree based on the 9 SNPs selected for SCGs. Model-based neighbour-joining tree based on the 9 SNPs resolved of the 75 M. tuberculosis complex isolates and the reference strain analysed into the different SCGs. Numbers designate each SCG and Spoligotyping families are indicated by a different colour detailed in the legend. The SNP lineages that belong to the three “major genetic” groups based on combination of two alleles at katG463 and gyrA95 are also highlighted. The scale bar indicates the number of SNP difference.
Phylogenetic distribution of the T, U and with no SIT isolates according to their SCG
| Haarlem | | | | | | 1 | | 7 | 8 | |
| No Haarlem | 1 | | 1 | | | | | 2 | 4 | |
| BOVIS | | | | | | | | 1 | 1 | |
| LAM | 1 | | | | | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 | |
| No LAM | 1 | | | | | | | 1 | 2 | |
| “Authentic” T | 5 | 1 | | 1 | 1 | 2 | | 4 | 14 | |
| New pattern | 1 | | | | | 1 | | | 2 | |