A series of self-associating foldamers have been designed as heparin reversal agents, as antidotes to prevent bleeding due to this potent antithrombotic agent. The foldamers have a repeating sequence of Lys-Sal, in which Sal is 5-amino-2-methoxy-benzoic acid. These foldamers are designed to self-associate along one face of an extended chain in a β-sheet-like interaction. The methoxy groups were included to form intramolecular hydrogen bonds that preclude the formation of very large amyloid-like aggregates, while the positively charged Lys side chains were introduced to interact electrostatically with the highly anionic heparin polymer. The prototype compound (Lys-Sal)4 carboxamide weakly associates in aqueous solution at physiological salt concentration in a monomer-dimer-hexamer equilibrium. The association is greatly enhanced at either high ionic strength or in the presence of a heparin derivative, which is bound tightly. Variants of this foldamer are active in an antithrombin III-factor Xa assay, showing their potential as heparin reversal agents.
A series of self-associating foldamers have been designed as heparin reversal agents, as antidotes to prevent bleeding due to this potent antithrombotic agent. The foldamers have a repeating sequence of Lys-Sal, in which Sal is 5-amino-2-methoxy-benzoic acid. These foldamers are designed to self-associate along one face of an extended chain in a β-sheet-like interaction. The methoxy groups were included to form intramolecular hydrogen bonds that preclude the formation of very large amyloid-like aggregates, while the positively charged Lys side chains were introduced to interact electrostatically with the highly anionic heparin polymer. The prototype compound (Lys-Sal)4 carboxamide weakly associates in aqueous solution at physiological salt concentration in a monomer-dimer-hexamer equilibrium. The association is greatly enhanced at either high ionic strength or in the presence of a heparin derivative, which is bound tightly. Variants of this foldamer are active in an antithrombin III-factor Xa assay, showing their potential as heparin reversal agents.
Foldamers
are nonbiological
sequence-specific polymers of defined-length oligomers that adopt
well-defined secondary and tertiary structures.[1−4] Not only are they used to test
hypotheses concerning biomacromolecular folding and function, but
also they can be used to design molecules for practical applications,
including mimics of antimicrobial peptides and inhibitors of protein–protein
interactions.[5−9] Previously, the design of biologically active foldamers has focused
on molecules that act as monomolecularly folded units. However, a
number of foldamers are also known to self-assemble into more complex
architectures than might be easily achieved using a monomeric unit,[10−16] because a large cooperatively formed unit can be assembled from
shorter pieces that individually are less well structured.[17−20] Here, we design self-assembling foldamers that recognize and antagonize
the antithrombotic action of heparin.Heparin, also known as
unfractionated heparin (UFH), is a complex
and highly sulphated glycosaminoglycan. This oligosaccharide is recognized
for its ability to prevent the coagulation of blood. Heparin inhibits
blood clotting by binding to the enzyme inhibitor antithrombin III
(ATIII), consequently inactivating factor Xa (FXa) and other proteolytic
enzymes involved in forming fibrin-rich clots.[21−25] Because of its antithrombotic function, heparin is
widely used clinically as an injectable anticoagulant for the prevention
and treatment of thrombosis.[26] For example,
heparin is commonly used for the prevention of clot formation during
cardiothoracic and vascular surgical procedures. However, following
surgery, heparin’s activity needs to be reversed. The only
agent presently approved to reverse the action of UFH is the arginine-rich
small heterogeneous protein preparation protamine. Protamine restores
clotting by binding UFH,[27] thereby reducing
its ability to bind to ATIII. Because UFH is highly negatively charged,
protamine and related basic peptides are able to neutralize its action
through electrostatic interactions.[28] However,
protamine and related peptides[29−31] have a number of serious adverse
side effects,[32,33] and there are no approved agents
for reversal of low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) such as fondaparinux
(Arixtra), a synthetic pentasaccharide heparin analogue.[34]Previous studies of heparin–protein
interactions with Arg-rich
peptides indicated that the minimal requirement for activity is the
presentation of a high density of cationic groups along one face of
a secondary structure.[29−31] Here, we design self-associating foldamers that similarly
interact with heparin using an electrostatic mechanism.As a
model for the foldamer backbone, we used principles previously
developed in the pioneering and encompassing contributions of the
groups of Huc,[12−14] Nowick,[10,15] and Gong.[11,16] Specifically, we chose a previously characterized backbone in which
an α-amino acid and a salicylamide alternate in sequence, which
we refer to as SalAA foldamers (Figure 1).[11,16,34−37] A short prototype
for this family of foldamers, designated (Sal-Gly-Sal) (Figure 1A), has been crystallized from organic solvents
and shown to form an antiparallel, two-stranded sheet-like dimer,
stabilized by intermolecular hydrogen bonds between the main chain
amides.[11] Aryl-methoxy groups form intramolecular
hydrogen bonds with amides not involved in the dimer interface (Figure 1A), thereby further stabilizing the structure and
preventing the formation of long fibrils. To use this backbone as
a reversibly associating scaffold, we positioned cationic side chains
along the backbone to attract heparin via electrostatic interactions
as in previous heparin-binding peptides and proteins. This led to
the design of (Sal-Lys) foldamers (Figure 1B, C, and D). Intermolecular electrostatic repulsion
between the Lys side chains would lead to weak association in solution
at physiological salt concentrations. However, we expected that the
SalAA foldamers would associate under conditions in which the electrostatic
repulsion was minimized (e.g., when they bind to heparin).
Figure 1
Chemical structures
of SalAA foldamers explored in this study.
(A) Schematic (left) and crystal structure (right) of a dimeric foldamer
based on the salicylamide backbone, Ac-Sal-Gly-Sal-NMe amide, in which
Ac is acetyl, Sal is the indicated amino-salicylic acid methyl ether
unit, Gly is glycine, and NMe amide is an N-methyl
amide. (B) Chemical structures of salicylamide-α-amino acid
peptides (SalAA foldamers) for C-terminal and N-terminal (C) modified
series. (D) Chemical structure of compound 7, (d-Cit-Sal)4-CONH2; in this variant of (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2, compound 1, cationic lysine
is replaced with a neutral citrulline amino acid.
Chemical structures
of SalAA foldamers explored in this study.
(A) Schematic (left) and crystal structure (right) of a dimeric foldamer
based on the salicylamide backbone, Ac-Sal-Gly-Sal-NMe amide, in which
Ac is acetyl, Sal is the indicated amino-salicylic acid methyl ether
unit, Gly is glycine, and NMe amide is an N-methyl
amide. (B) Chemical structures of salicylamide-α-amino acid
peptides (SalAA foldamers) for C-terminal and N-terminal (C) modified
series. (D) Chemical structure of compound 7, (d-Cit-Sal)4-CONH2; in this variant of (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2, compound 1, cationic lysine
is replaced with a neutral citrulline amino acid.Here, we examine the association of the (Lys-Sal) foldamer by using the techniques of analytical ultracentrifugation
(AUC), concentration-dependent UV–vis absorption, circular
dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, and isothermal calorimetry (ITC). The
foldamers exist in a monomer-dimer-hexamer (trimer of dimers) equilibrium.
The hexameric structure, although not anticipated in the initial design,
can be rationalized in terms of the predicted structure of the dimer,
due to the hydrophobicity of the salicylamide backbone. The salt-dependence
of the interaction demonstrates that the association is opposed by
electrostatic repulsion in the absence of heparin. Importantly, the
pentasaccharide heparin analogue fondaparinux binds tightly to the
associated form of the foldamer, as anticipated in the design.
Results
and Discussion
Design Considerations
The key to
heparin’s activity
is a specific pentasaccharide sulfation sequence, which is important
for antithrombin III binding.[34,38−41] The foldamers were designed to target this pentasaccharide region
of heparin, based on the overall length and shape of the saccharide.
However, in this first round of design, we did not strive to specifically
recognize the fine-grained geometry of the target. Instead, based
on earlier studies with poly-Arg peptides[30,42−44] and heparin-binding foldamers,[5] we expected that the creation of a positively charged patch
of appropriate dimensions would be sufficient to bind the pentasaccharide.Based on the structure of (Sal-Gly-Sal) (Figure 1A), we designed a series of (Sal-Lys) foldamers (Figure 1B, C, and D), which
should form two-stranded β-sheet-like structures in which the
basic Lys side chains project from one face of the structure. Molecular
models suggested that four Sal-Lys units (as in compound 1, Figure 1) would be sufficient to mediate
binding to the pentasaccharide. This also turned out to be the minimal
length required to allow association into the active oligomeric form
in aqueous solution. To probe the requirements for self-association
and heparin binding, we varied the chain length and the nature of
the N-and C-terminal functional groups (compounds 2–6; Figures 1B, C). Furthermore, to
determine the effect of charge, we replaced the Lys residues with
citrulline (d-Cit) in compound 7 (Figure 1D).
Anti-heparin Activity Is Dependent on Chain
Length and Charge
The ability of the foldamers to interact
with heparin was evaluated
using the pentasaccharidefondaparinux. This pentasaccharide interacts
with anti-thrombin III, triggering the inhibition of factor Xa (FXa).
The foldamers were able to reverse this interaction in a concentration-dependent
manner. We first examined the chain-length dependence of the potency
of the foldamers, as assessed by their EC50 values in this
assay (Table 1, top). A foldamer with only
three (Lys-Sal) units was inactive, but extending its length by one
Sal unit resulted in a compound, 5, with a 6.8 μM
EC50. Further extension of an Ac-Sal unit, compound 6, increased activity to an EC50 of 2.3 μM;
addition of a Lys-Sal unit, compound 1, failed to further
increase potency but rather decreased potency slightly. The activity
did not depend on chirality, as the enantiomer of 1, 1a, was nearly equipotent to 1. To test whether
the electrostatic interactions between Lys and the foldamer were essential
for activity, we synthesized compound 7, in which neutral
citrulline replaced the lysine residues. As expected, this compound
was fully inactive.
Table 1
Anti-fondaparinux
Activities of N-Terminal
Truncations, Side Chain Modifications, and C-Terminal Truncations
of SalAA Foldamersa
compound
sequence
FXa EC50 (μM)
N-Terminal Modifications
8
H2N-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
inactive
5
Sal-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
6.8
6
Ac-Sal-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
2.3
1
Lys-Sal-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
3.6
1a
H2N-(d-Lys-Sal)4CONH2
3.0
7
H2N-(d-Cit-Sal)4-CONH2
inactive
C-Terminal Modifications
1
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-CONH2
3.6
2
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-COOH
inactive
3
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-COOCH3
11
4
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-CONH-(CH2)2-COOH
6.0
Average standard deviation was
±9%.
Average standard deviation was
±9%.We next tested
the effect of changes to the C-terminus of compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2 (Table 1, bottom). The C-terminal carboxamide was expected
to be important for self-association, so we explored replacing it
with a carboxylate in compound 2, (Lys-Sal)4-COOH, which resulted in an inactive analogue. The corresponding
methyl ester (Lys-Sal)4-COOCH3, 3, showed weak potency. By contrast, the extension of the C-terminal
residue to a β-Ala unit (Lys-Sal)4-CO-β-Ala-carboxylate, 4, had an EC50 of 6.0 μM. Thus, a carboxylate
is not necessarily detrimental if it is moved sufficiently away from
the (Lys-Sal) core. In summary, the C-terminal
Sal monomer should optimally be an amide, but the substituent from
the amide group can be either a carboxamide (CONH2) or
a β-Ala residue.
Self-Association of Foldamers
We
expected that the
Lys-Sal foldamers would self-associate weakly at physiological pH,
because of electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged
Lys residues. Association of the highly anionic pentasaccharide would
alleviate this repulsion, thereby driving the self-association of
the foldamer upon heparin complexation. If this model is correct,
then we would expect that compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2, would associate only weakly in the absence of
fondaparinux. Also, its self-association would depend on ionic strength,
becoming more favorable at high salt concentrations that could electrostatically
shield the interactions between neighboring Lys side chains. Similarly,
the folding and assembly of (d-Cit-Sal)4-CONH2 (compound 7) would be highly favorable, because
it lacks the destabilizing electrostatic interactions between the
charged Lys side chains. Furthermore, as the chain length is shortened
from four to three Lys-Sal units (compounds 1 and 8, respectively), we expect that the free energy of self-association
of the foldamer would become less favorable, explaining this compound’s
lack of activity. Finally, if the C-terminal carboxamide of 1 stabilized folding through the formation of an intermolecular
hydrogen bond, then the C-terminal carboxyl-containing2, (Lys-Sal)4-COOH, and the corresponding methyl ester
(3) might weakly self-associate.To address these
questions, we first extensively examined the assembly and folding
of compound 1, as a prototype of the series. Next we
examined the ability of the variants of compound 1 to
assemble in aqueous solution. Finally, we examined the direct interaction
of compound 1 and selected variants with fondaparinux.
Analytical Ultracentrifugation (AUC) of Compound 1 Reveals
a Monomer-Dimer-Hexameric Assembly
Compound 1 was examined by sedimentation equilibrium AUC. The compound
was dissolved in TBS buffer at physiological salt concentration (0.050
M Tris, pH 7.4; 0.15 M NaCl). Curves derived from a single species
of a fixed association state failed to fit the data, as did fully
cooperative monomer-nmer equilibrium schemes. We
therefore examined multistep assemblies. The best fit was obtained
with a dimer-hexamer model (Supplementary Figure
S1).
CD and UV–vis Spectroscopy of Compound 1 Reveals a Concentration-Dependent Monomer-Dimer-Hexamer
Equilibrium
Compound 1 showed marked changes
in its electronic
spectra for the range of concentrations it was shown to associate
by AUC. The CD spectrum of 1 (Figure 2A, B) shows large changes in mean residue ellipticity with
increasing concentration, consistent with the formation of a stable
organized structure. The aromatic absorption from 300 to 350 nm (Figure 2A, C) shows a single peak (Figure 2A) at low concentrations in the CD spectrum, which closely
matches that of the corresponding absorbance spectrum (Figure 2C). However, as the concentration and degree of
association increase, this band resolves into a pair of bands of opposite
sign. This splitting is indicative of excitonic coupling between the
aromatic groups, as anticipated from the designed conformation. In
parallel, the absorbance spectrum shows a shift to longer wavelengths,
from about 310 to 320 nm, as the concentration is increased.
Figure 2
Concentration-dependent
CD spectra of compound 1 in
the near (A) and far (B) UV regions. Extinction coefficient as a function
of wavelength (C), determined from near UV–vis absorption spectra.
CD mean residue ellipticity (MRE) at 333 nm and UV–vis absorption
shifts in λmax are overlaid (D) with their respective
fits; Khex equals 10–18.4 (or 4.0 × 10–19) M5 for CD MRE333 and 10–19.3 (or 5 × 10–20) M5 for UV–vis λmax.
Concentration-dependent
CD spectra of compound 1 in
the near (A) and far (B) UV regions. Extinction coefficient as a function
of wavelength (C), determined from near UV–vis absorption spectra.
CD mean residue ellipticity (MRE) at 333 nm and UV–vis absorption
shifts in λmax are overlaid (D) with their respective
fits; Khex equals 10–18.4 (or 4.0 × 10–19) M5 for CD MRE333 and 10–19.3 (or 5 × 10–20) M5 for UV–vis λmax.The change in the concentration-dependent spectra
of both the CD
(mean residue ellipticity at 333 nm, MRE333 nm) and
UV–vis (λmax) values (Figure 2D) can be fit into a monomer-dimer-hexamer equilibrium. However,
due to the lower degree of sensitivity and greater scatter of the
data in this experiment, we were unable to precisely fit both monomer-dimer
(K(mon-dim)) and dimer-hexamer
(K(dim-hex)) equilibrium constants.
The product of the two equilibrium constants for the overall assembly
(K(mon-hex) = K(mon-dim)3 × K(dim-hex)) was well-defined, but the two equilibrium constants covaried when
fit individually. Therefore, we fit the curves to a cooperative monomer-hexamer
equilibria (K(mon-hex)). The values
of the derived dissociation constants were similar (4.0 × 10–19 M5 and 5 × 10–20 M5, from CD and UV–vis respectively). These dissociation
constants correspond to midpoints of association ([1]mid) of 0.29 and 0.19 mM, respectively. Thus, under physiological
salt concentration, 1 weakly associates into a well-structured
oligomer with a midpoint of approximately 250 μM, and the agreement
of the fit from both CD and absorbance spectroscopy indicates that
the two techniques are comparable.
ITC Investigation of the
Dissociation of Compound 1 Confirms Concentration-Dependent
Self-Assembly
We used
isothermal calorimetry to measure the heat of dissociation of compound 1 (Figure 3). The compound was dissolved
in TBS at 1 mM concentration where it is predominantly in the associated
form and then serially diluted into buffer. Initially, a large heat
change is observed as the compound dissociates, but with each additional
increment the concentration of 1 in the cell increases,
leading to decreased net association (Figure 3A, B).
Figure 3
Concentration-dependent ITC of 1. A stock solution
of 1.0 mM 1 in TBS was serially diluted into the same
buffer (A). The heat associated with each injection was determined
by integrating the peaks. The heat generated for a given final concentration
is then summed and expressed in cal/mol vs final concentration (B).
The smooth line shows the best fit of a monomer-dimer-hexamer equilibrium
to the data (see Methods). The weight fraction
distribution for hexamer, dimer, and monomer species are plotted vs
concentration (C).
Concentration-dependent ITC of 1. A stock solution
of 1.0 mM 1 in TBS was serially diluted into the same
buffer (A). The heat associated with each injection was determined
by integrating the peaks. The heat generated for a given final concentration
is then summed and expressed in cal/mol vs final concentration (B).
The smooth line shows the best fit of a monomer-dimer-hexamer equilibrium
to the data (see Methods). The weight fraction
distribution for hexamer, dimer, and monomer species are plotted vs
concentration (C).
Association of Compound 1 Variants Measured by
UV–vis Spectroscopy
We next used UV–vis spectroscopy
to determine how C-terminal modifications affected the assembly of
the foldamers. As for 1, the changes in λmax were measured as a function of each variant’s concentration
(Figure 4A, B). Compound 4, which
has an additional β-Ala residue compared to 1,
showed a similar curve, but the midpoint was shifted to lower concentrations.
Fitting a monomer-hexamer equilibrium to the data gave values of λmax for the monomer and hexamer that were the same within experimental
error for the two compounds, but the midpoint was shifted from 0.19
mM for 1 to 0.06 mM for 4. By contrast,
the C-terminal methyl ester, 3, showed a much weaker
association as compared to 1 (midpoint = 0.37 mM), and
(Lys-Sal)4-COOH, 2, did not appear to associate
at all over this concentration range.
Figure 4
UV–vis absorption
λmax and normalized ITC
heats of dilution as a function of SalAA foldamer concentration. (A)
UV–vis absorption λmax as a function of SalAA
foldamer concentration for C-terminal modifications. (B) UV–vis
absorption λmax as a function of SalAA foldamer concentration
for N-terminal modifications. Normalized ITC heats of dilution (pK(hex-mon)) values are summarized in Table 2 as a function of SalAA foldamer concentration for
C-terminal (C) and N-terminal (D) modified series, and their respective
fits are illustrated as lines.
Compound 7 (Cit-Sal)4-CONH2, in which the Lys side chains
are converted to neutral citrulline residues, did not appear to show
significant dissociation over the concentration range where 1 showed a concentration-dependent spectrum. Compound 7 showed a λmax value of 316 ± 1 nm,
as seen for the hexameric form of 1. However, its association
appeared to be so strong that it failed to dissociate over this concentration
range, presumably because it lacked the electrostatic repulsive interactions
between closely opposing Lys side chains seen in 1.The UV–vis spectra for the N-terminally truncated foldamers
showed that the N-terminal Lys residue in (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2 was not essential for association, but further truncation
led to a loss of association. Compounds 5 and 6 associated more tightly than 1, with midpoints of 0.08
and 0.07 mM for 5 and 6 respectively. The
foldamer with an unacylated salicylamide monomer (5)
had a slightly greater λmax in the hexamer, which
we attribute to the fact that only this foldamer had a free aniline
group. The tighter association of compound 5 and 6, which lack the N-terminal Lys of 1, is consistent
with the idea that electrostatic repulsion disfavors association of 1, as removal of a Lys from the N-terminus would decrease
the net charge. However, further truncation of the N-terminal Lys-Saldipeptide unit gave a compound that did not associate over the measured
concentration range, as assessed from the fact that compound 8, (Lys-Sal)3-CONH2, did not show any
spectral changes at concentrations as high as 500 μM (Supplementary Figure S2; Table 2).
Table 2
Effects of C-Terminal Modifications
and N-Terminal Modifications on the Association of Compound 1, Determined from the Concentration Dependence of the UV–vis
Absorption and ITCa
pK(hex-mon)
compound
sequence
ITC
UV–vis
λmax(hex) (nm)
λmax(mon) (nm)
Δλmax (nm)
ΔH(hex-mon) (cal/mol)
C-Terminal Modifications
1
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-CONH2
18.8
19.3
318.1
303.5
14.6
14100
2
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-COOH
302
3
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-COOCH3
17.9
315.1
304.4
10.7
4
H2N-(Lys-Sal)4-CONH-(CH2)2-COOH
21.0
21.8
317.6
303.1
14.5
13800
N-Terminal Modifications
8
(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
<15
304.0
5
Sal-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
20.3
21.1
323.3
305.7
17.6
15700
6
Ac-Sal-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
21.7
21.5
319.8
305.1
14.7
15600
1
Lys-Sal-(Lys-Sal)3-CONH2
18.8
19.3
318.1
303.5
14.6
14100
Δλmax is
the difference between the λmax values of the hexameric
and monomeric species, determined from the fits. The association of
compound 2 was too weak for UV–vis data fitting.
ITC heats of formation were too small to accurately determine dissociation
constants for compounds 2 and 3.
Dissociation of Variants of Compound 1 Measured
by ITC
For concentration-dependent ITC, variants of 1 in TBS buffer were diluted in a calorimetric cell at 25
°C in the same manner described for compound 1 (Figure 4C, D). Because the dissociation of 1 was highly cooperative, the data were fit to a cooperative monomer-dimer-hexamer
equilibrium (Table 2). As before, the UV–vis
and ITC results are in good agreement and share the same trends with
tightest self-assembly for the N-terminally and C-terminally modified
variants (5, 6, and 4, respectively).
Weaker association was seen for the methyl ester variant (3 relative to compound 1), and the degree of heat formation
was too small to allow accurate fitting of the dissociation constant
to the curve. Also, as seen by UV–vis spectroscopy, very weak
to no self-assembly was observed for the carboxylate variant, 2. UV–vis and ITC data are summarized together, for
comparison, in Table 2.UV–vis absorption
λmax and normalized ITC
heats of dilution as a function of SalAA foldamer concentration. (A)
UV–vis absorption λmax as a function of SalAA
foldamer concentration for C-terminal modifications. (B) UV–vis
absorption λmax as a function of SalAA foldamer concentration
for N-terminal modifications. Normalized ITC heats of dilution (pK(hex-mon)) values are summarized in Table 2 as a function of SalAA foldamer concentration for
C-terminal (C) and N-terminal (D) modified series, and their respective
fits are illustrated as lines.Δλmax is
the difference between the λmax values of the hexameric
and monomeric species, determined from the fits. The association of
compound 2 was too weak for UV–vis data fitting.
ITC heats of formation were too small to accurately determine dissociation
constants for compounds 2 and 3.
Ionic Strength Dependence of the Association
of Compound 1
The above data on variants of 1 strongly
suggest that its association is electrostatically destabilized by
close opposition of the Lys side chains upon association. If this
is the case, then decreasing the ionic strength should weaken the
association of 1, while increasing ionic strength should
have the opposite effect. Figure 5 shows the
concentration-dependent UV–vis spectra for 1 at
NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 1.0 M NaCl. Global fitting of
the curves indicated that the midpoint of the transition shifts from
less than 4 μM to greater than 1 mM as the [NaCl] is varied
from 0 to 1.0 M.
Figure 5
Concentration-dependent shifts in λmax for 1 at varying [NaCl] in 0.05 M Tris, pH 7.4. The
smooth curves
were generated by global fitting of the data to a monomer-hexamer
equilibrium. The value of λmax for the monomer (304
nm) and hexamer (318 nm) were globally fit, while the value of pK(hex-mon) was allowed to vary for each
curve. The fit pK(hex-mon) values
were <15 at 0 M NaCl, 17.4 at 0.05 M, 19.7 at 0.15 M, 24.1 at 0.5
M, and 26.5 at 1.0 M.
Concentration-dependent shifts in λmax for 1 at varying [NaCl] in 0.05 M Tris, pH 7.4. The
smooth curves
were generated by global fitting of the data to a monomer-hexamer
equilibrium. The value of λmax for the monomer (304
nm) and hexamer (318 nm) were globally fit, while the value of pK(hex-mon) was allowed to vary for each
curve. The fit pK(hex-mon) values
were <15 at 0 M NaCl, 17.4 at 0.05 M, 19.7 at 0.15 M, 24.1 at 0.5
M, and 26.5 at 1.0 M.
Binding of Fondaparinux Induces Association and Folding of Compound 1: CD and ITC
Next, we sought to determine how fondaparinux
influenced the association of the SalAA foldamer. The ability of compound 1 to bind to fondaparinux was measured by CD titrations (Figure 6A) in which increasing equivalents of fondaparinux
were titrated into 25 μM compound 1. At this low
concentration compound 1 gave a CD spectrum typical of
the monomeric form, but a spectrum that was identical in shape to
that of the hexamer was observed at high fondaparinux concentrations
(Figure 2A). The titration curve is linear
up to 6.25 μM fondaparinux; beyond this point no further spectral
changes were observed. This titration behavior is typical of a tight-binding
isotherm. An increase in light-scattering was also observed as the
concentration of fondaparinux was increased, which made it difficult
to obtain quality spectra at higher fondaparinux concentrations.
Figure 6
Near UV CD and ITC characterizations of SalAA compound 1 binding to fondaparinux. (A) Near UV CD spectra of the fondaparinux
titration of compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2, where increasing concentrations of fondaparinux were titrated
into 25 μM compound 1. (B) Concentration-dependent
ITC of fondaparinux titrated into compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2. Shown are the raw data of 150 μM
fondaparinux (stock solution) titrated into 50 μM compound 1. (C) Accumulated integrated heat changes as a function of
fondaparinux:foldamer molar ratio for three experiments at the listed
concentrations.
In order to confirm the association of fondaparinux with 1, the titration was also monitored using ITC. Compound 1 was dissolved in TBS at concentrations between 25 μM and 50
μM, where it is largely monomeric (Figure 6B). This solution was titrated with fondaparinux; the concentration
of the stock solution of fondaparinux was adjusted to ensure equal
equivalents per injection for each titration. In each case linear
binding curves were observed (Figure 6B). Interestingly,
while the heat change was positive for the dissociation of 1 (Figure 3A) the heparin-binding curves showed
negative enthalpy changes (Figure 6B). This
finding is consistent with the finding that the low molecular weight
heparin analogue induces association of 1, although the
association of fondaparinux complicates a quantitative analysis of
the energetics. At each concentration of 1 examined,
the fondaparinux-promoted SalAA foldamer self-association saturates
at a 1:3 molar ratio. Given the stoichiometry and similarity of the
CD spectrum of the bound form to that of the hexameric form of 1, it appears that two fondaparinux molecules bound per tetramer.
The titration behavior suggests that the dissociation constant for
the interaction is significantly lower than the concentration of 1.Near UV CD and ITC characterizations of SalAA compound 1 binding to fondaparinux. (A) Near UV CD spectra of the fondaparinux
titration of compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2, where increasing concentrations of fondaparinux were titrated
into 25 μM compound 1. (B) Concentration-dependent
ITC of fondaparinux titrated into compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2. Shown are the raw data of 150 μM
fondaparinux (stock solution) titrated into 50 μM compound 1. (C) Accumulated integrated heat changes as a function of
fondaparinux:foldamer molar ratio for three experiments at the listed
concentrations.
Conclusions
Here,
we design a series of foldamers that
use the principle of self-assembly to create a heparin-interactive
surface. Our data confirm this design principle and suggest that the
stable and active form of SalAA foldamers occurs in the presence of
fondaparinux; in the absence of fondaparinux the foldamer favors a
monomer. The association of foldamers is best described below in a
monomer-dimer-hexamer equilibrium in the absence and presence of fondaparinux
asWhile our
original design called for a dimeric association,
we experimentally discovered that 1 further associated
to a hexamer. We have not yet solved the structure for the hexamer
but expect that it is driven by the amphiphilic conformation of the
dimer. The Lys side chains project from one face of the structure
while the other face of the dimer is rich in aromatic groups and the
methyl ethers of the salicylamide. Thus, it is likely that this hydrophobic
surface leads to further self-association. The association into the
hexameric form also requires close association of the Lys side chains,
which suggested that the association should be more favorable in the
presence of increasing ionic strength that would screen the electrostatically
repulsive interaction. This was found to be the case and further supports
the idea that the hexameric form associates with fondaparinux by electrostatic
interactions. Also supporting this idea, the neutral citrulline-containing
foldamer (7) self-associated but did not bind fondaparinux.The detailed SAR that emerged from this work is also consistent
with the linked equilibrium in which the binding of fondaparinux is
dependent on oligomerization of the foldamer. The data in Table 2 show that there is a minimal core that is required
for association of the Lys-Sal foldamers into a hexamer, shown in
blue in the chemical structures shown below.Compounds in which the N-terminus was elongated beyond this
core
(e.g., with a Lys- in 1 or Ac- in 6) retained
the ability to associate. Also, the C-terminus could be extended with
a β-Ala with retention of the ability to self-associate. Moreover,
deletions or replacements to the core led to molecules that failed
to self-associate. For example, deletion of the N-terminal Sal residue
or substitution of the C-terminal amide with either a carboxylate
or a methyl ester strongly decreased self-association.According
to the self-assembly scheme, binding of fondaparinux
requires both self-association into hexamers as well as interaction
with the pentasaccharide, so both steps contribute to the potency
of a given compound. Compounds that failed to show appreciable self-association
(e.g., 2, 8) were completely inactive in
the FXa assay. Similarly, the methyl ester of 1 showed
reduced affinity for self-association as well as reduced potency in
the factor Xa assay. On the other hand, self-association per se was
not sufficient to ensure interaction with fondaparinux. For example,
compound 7, (Cit-Sal)4-CONH2, which
has neutral side chains was inactive in the FXa assay, and compounds
with reduced positive charge, such as 4, self-associated
but was somewhat less potent in the factor Xa assay. The interrelation
between self-association and fondaparinux activity can be further
seen in a comparison of compound 5, Sal-(Lys-Sal)3CONH2, and 6, Ac-Sal-(Lys-Sal)3CONH2. Both compounds have similar charge (we assume
the N-terminal Sal aniline group of 5 would be neutral
at the assay pH of 8.4), but compound 6 is more potent
at reversing the effects of fondaparanux, likely because of its greater
tendency to self-associate (Table 2).In summary, this work extends the use of the SalAA backbone to
the design of a self-assembling foldamer that inhibits fondaparinux
in a clinically relevant assay. Also compound 1 was highly
active in a standard activated partial thromboplastin time aPTT assay
(IC50 = 1.1 μM versus unfractionated heparin, as
described in the Supporting Information). Future papers will describe further modifications of this backbone
to increase affinity and specificity for this target.
Methods
Synthesis of SalAA Foldamers
Foldamers 1–3 were prepared by
solution phase methods that
are described in detail in the Supporting Information. Foldamers 5–8 were synthesized
by solid phase methods as described in the Supporting
Information. Foldamer 4 was similarly synthesized
on preloaded Fmoc-β-alanine Wang resin (Novabiochem) (Supporting Information).
Heparin Reversal Assay
Neutralization of antifactor
Xa activity was determined in a kinetic in vitro amidolytic assay
for factor Xa activity. Humanantithrombin III and bovine factor Xa
were obtained from Diapharma; 0.036 IU/mL antithrombin was combined
with 0.636 nkat/mL bovine factor Xa in a NaCl Tris pH 8.4 buffer.
Activity was determined by kinetically monitoring cleavage of a chromogenic
substrate, S-2765 (Diapharma) in a SpectraMax 250 plate reader at
OD405 nm. Fondaparinux was added at a final concentration
of 0.02 μg/mL to inhibit factor Xa activity. Reversal of fondaparinux
was measured following addition of serially diluted compound. EC50 was calculated as the amount of compound needed to return
factor Xa activity to 50% that of normal.
The oligomerization
state and affinity for compound 1, (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2, was characterized by sedimentation
equilibrium AUC, using a Beckman XL-I analytical ultracentrifuge at
25 °C in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, 0.050 M Tris, 0.150 M NaCl,
pH 7.4). Here, 250 μM (Lys-Sal)4-CONH2 was centrifuged at 35, 40, 45, 48 KRPM, respectively, and the concentration
distributions vs rotor diameter were collected at 280 nm. The data
were analyzed by globally fitting using nonlinear least-squares (IGOR
Pro Wavemetrics). The data are not well described by a single molecular
species, which prompted the examination of several different association
schemes. The simplest that was able to fit the data adequately was
a dimer-hexamer scheme. The fitting procedures and experimental method
are provided in more detail in the Supporting
Information.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)
Each foldamer
was diluted directly into Tris-buffered saline (TBS, 0.050 M Tris,
0.150 M NaCl, pH 7.4). The foldamers were prepared at final concentrations
of 1 mM in TBS buffer and titrated into TBS buffer in the calorimetric
cell at 25 °C. The heat exchange evolved in each injection was
obtained from the integral area of the calorimetric signal and has
been normalized upon each accumulated addition. The normalized heat
of compound 1 was plotted as a function of foldamer concentration
and analyzed using a monomer-dimer-hexamer model, while a monomer-hexamer
fitting model was applied to the other foldamers.Detailed procedures
for data fitting can be found in the Supporting
Information.
Circular Dichrosim (CD) Spectroscopy
Concentration-dependent
CD data were collected on a Jasco CD spectropolarimeter (J-810) using
either a 10.0, 5.0, 1.0, 0.5, or 0.2 mm sample cuvette, and the ellipticity
was expressed as mean residue ellipticity. Concentration-dependent
CD experiments of foldamers were obtained in TBS buffer at 25 °C
in step scan mode with a 1 nm data pitch, 4 s response time, 1 nm
bandwidth, and 3 accumulations. CD experiments for fondaparinux-foldamer
titrations were conducted in a 10 mm sample cuvette as described above
with the addition of 5 min mixing upon each addition of fondaparinux.The observed MRE (MREobs) at 333 nm as a function of
foldamer concentration was analyzed by nonlinear least-squares fitting
to an equilibrium hexamer-monomer disassociation by IGOR Pro (Wavemetrics).
The experimental observables are MREobs at 333 nm and the
total foldamer concentration [T], which is given by eqs 2A and 2B
(Supporting Information). The MREobs was expressed as the sum of the MRE of the hexamer and the monomer
(eq 3). MREhex and MREmon are dependent variables, which are obtained by nonlinear least-squares
fitting to eq 3:in which C is a constant,
which was found to be close to zero.
UV–vis Absorption
Spectroscopy
UV–vis
concentration-dependent and fondaparinux-foldamer titration data were
collected on a HP diode array or Varian CARY 100 (used for dilution
series) spectrophotometer using either a 10 or 1 mm sample cuvette.
λmax was plotted as a function of peptide concentration;
the data were analyzed according to eq 3, except
that the value of λmax for the hexamer and monomer
were the fitting variables.
Authors: Dahui Liu; Sungwook Choi; Bin Chen; Robert J Doerksen; Dylan J Clements; Jeffrey D Winkler; Michael L Klein; William F DeGrado Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2004-02-20 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Imola Cs Szigyártó; Judith Mihály; András Wacha; Dóra Bogdán; Tünde Juhász; Gergely Kohut; Gitta Schlosser; Ferenc Zsila; Vlada Urlacher; Zoltán Varga; Ferenc Fülöp; Attila Bóta; István Mándity; Tamás Beke-Somfai Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Katelyn M Seither; Heather A McMahon; Nikita Singh; Hejia Wang; Mimi Cushman-Nick; Geronda L Montalvo; William F DeGrado; James Shorter Journal: Biochem J Date: 2014-11-15 Impact factor: 3.857
Authors: Loryn E Fechner; Buthaina Albanyan; Vânia M P Vieira; Erik Laurini; Paola Posocco; Sabrina Pricl; David K Smith Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Daniel Carbajo; Yolanda Pérez; Marta Guerra-Rebollo; Eva Prats; Jordi Bujons; Ignacio Alfonso Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 7.446