BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: AT₁ receptor antagonists decrease body weight gain in models of murine obesity. However, fewer data are available concerning the anti-obesity effects of these antagonists, given as a treatment after obesity had been established. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In spontaneously hypertensive rats, obesity was established by cafeteria diet (CD) feeding for 19 weeks. Rats were then were treated with telmisartan (8 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹) or amlodipine (10 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹; serving as blood pressure control) or telmisartan + amlodipine (2 + 10 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹; to control for dose-dependency) for 17 weeks. Rats receiving only chow (C(chow)) or CD-fed rats treated with vehicle (C(CD)) served as controls. KEY RESULTS: The CD feeding induced obesity, hyperphagia, hyperlipidaemia, and leptin and insulin resistance. Telmisartan reduced the CD-induced increase in body weight and abdominal fat mass. Whereas energy intake was higher rather than lower, the respiratory ratio was lower. After telmisartan, leptin-induced energy intake was reduced and respiratory ratio was increased compared with C(CD) rats. Telmisartan also decreased plasma levels of triglycerides, free fatty acids and low-density lipoprotein. Amlodipine alone or the combination telmisartan + amlodipine did not affect body weight and eating behaviour. Telmisartan, but not amlodipine and telmisartan + amlodipine, improved glucose utilization. The decrease in BP reduction was almost the same in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Telmisartan exerted anti-obesity effects and restored leptin sensitivity, given as a treatment to rats with obesity. Such effects required high doses of telmisartan and were independent of the decrease in blood pressure.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: AT₁ receptor antagonists decrease body weight gain in models of murineobesity. However, fewer data are available concerning the anti-obesity effects of these antagonists, given as a treatment after obesity had been established. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In spontaneously hypertensiverats, obesity was established by cafeteria diet (CD) feeding for 19 weeks. Rats were then were treated with telmisartan (8 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹) or amlodipine (10 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹; serving as blood pressure control) or telmisartan + amlodipine (2 + 10 mg·kg⁻¹·d⁻¹; to control for dose-dependency) for 17 weeks. Rats receiving only chow (C(chow)) or CD-fed rats treated with vehicle (C(CD)) served as controls. KEY RESULTS: The CD feeding induced obesity, hyperphagia, hyperlipidaemia, and leptin and insulin resistance. Telmisartan reduced the CD-induced increase in body weight and abdominal fat mass. Whereas energy intake was higher rather than lower, the respiratory ratio was lower. After telmisartan, leptin-induced energy intake was reduced and respiratory ratio was increased compared with C(CD)rats. Telmisartan also decreased plasma levels of triglycerides, free fatty acids and low-density lipoprotein. Amlodipine alone or the combination telmisartan + amlodipine did not affect body weight and eating behaviour. Telmisartan, but not amlodipine and telmisartan + amlodipine, improved glucose utilization. The decrease in BP reduction was almost the same in all treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Telmisartan exerted anti-obesity effects and restored leptin sensitivity, given as a treatment to rats with obesity. Such effects required high doses of telmisartan and were independent of the decrease in blood pressure.
Authors: Florian Gembardt; Silvia Heringer-Walther; Joep H M van Esch; Anja Sterner-Kock; Richard van Veghel; Thu H Le; Ingrid M Garrelds; Thomas M Coffman; A H Jan Danser; Heinz-Peter Schultheiss; Thomas Walther Journal: FASEB J Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Walter Raasch; Christian Wittmershaus; Andreas Dendorfer; Inga Voges; Friedrich Pahlke; Christoph Dodt; Peter Dominiak; Olaf Jöhren Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Johanna Schuchard; Martina Winkler; Ines Stölting; Franziska Schuster; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen; Christoph Thorns; Robson A Santos; Michael Bader; Walter Raasch Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-06-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Chris L Schaich; Hossam A Shaltout; Megan Grabenauer; Brian F Thomas; Patricia E Gallagher; Allyn C Howlett; Debra I Diz Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Martina Winkler; Johanna Schuchard; Ines Stölting; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen; Christoph Thorns; Michael Bader; Walter Raasch Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2016-03-27 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Baojian Xue; Yang Yu; Zhongming Zhang; Fang Guo; Terry G Beltz; Robert L Thunhorst; Robert B Felder; Alan Kim Johnson Journal: Hypertension Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Ruben Rodriguez; Jacqueline N Minas; Jose Pablo Vazquez-Medina; Daisuke Nakano; David G Parkes; Akira Nishiyama; Rudy M Ortiz Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 4.286