BACKGROUND: International guidelines for hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2(-)) advanced breast cancer (BC) recommend sequential lines of hormonal therapy (HT), and only recommend chemotherapy for patients with extensive visceral involvement or rapidly progressive disease. This study evaluated actual physician-reported treatments for advanced BC in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 355 postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced BC who progressed on ≥1 line of HT (adjuvant or advanced) and completed ≥1 line of chemotherapy (advanced). Treatment choice was evaluated for each line of therapy. RESULTS: Of 355 patients, 111 (31%) received first-line chemotherapy, whereas 218 (61%) and 26 (7%) switched from HT to chemotherapy in second and third line, respectively. More patients receiving first-line HT had bone metastases (73% vs 27% chemotherapy). Patients treated with first-line chemotherapy had more brain (12% vs 3% HT) or extensive liver (13% vs 6% HT) metastases. Subgroup analysis of 188 patients who received first-line HT and had de novo advanced BC or relapsed/recurrent disease more than 1 year after adjuvant therapy found that the majority (89%; n = 167) of these patients switched to chemotherapy in second line. However, among these 167 patients, 27% had no significant changes in metastases between first and second line. Among the 73% of patients who had significant changes in metastases, 20% had no brain metastases or extensive visceral disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the guideline-recommended use of multiple HT lines is open to interpretation and that optimal treatment for European postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced BC who responded to HT may not be achieved.
BACKGROUND: International guidelines for hormone-receptor-positive (HR(+)), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2(-)) advanced breast cancer (BC) recommend sequential lines of hormonal therapy (HT), and only recommend chemotherapy for patients with extensive visceral involvement or rapidly progressive disease. This study evaluated actual physician-reported treatments for advanced BC in Europe. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 355 postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced BC who progressed on ≥1 line of HT (adjuvant or advanced) and completed ≥1 line of chemotherapy (advanced). Treatment choice was evaluated for each line of therapy. RESULTS: Of 355 patients, 111 (31%) received first-line chemotherapy, whereas 218 (61%) and 26 (7%) switched from HT to chemotherapy in second and third line, respectively. More patients receiving first-line HT had bone metastases (73% vs 27% chemotherapy). Patients treated with first-line chemotherapy had more brain (12% vs 3% HT) or extensive liver (13% vs 6% HT) metastases. Subgroup analysis of 188 patients who received first-line HT and had de novo advanced BC or relapsed/recurrent disease more than 1 year after adjuvant therapy found that the majority (89%; n = 167) of these patients switched to chemotherapy in second line. However, among these 167 patients, 27% had no significant changes in metastases between first and second line. Among the 73% of patients who had significant changes in metastases, 20% had no brain metastases or extensive visceral disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the guideline-recommended use of multiple HT lines is open to interpretation and that optimal treatment for European postmenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced BC who responded to HT may not be achieved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Advanced breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Endocrine/hormone therapy; Europe; Guideline
Authors: Tobias Engler; Peter A Fasching; Diana Lüftner; Andreas D Hartkopf; Volkmar Müller; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Lothar Häberle; Johannes Ettl; Markus Wallwiener; Matthias W Beckmann; Alexander Hein; Erik Belleville; Sabrina Uhrig; Pauline Wimberger; Carsten Hielscher; Christian M Kurbacher; Rachel Wuerstlein; Michael Untch; Florin-Andrei Taran; Hans-Martin Enzinger; Petra Krabisch; Manfred Welslau; Michael Maasberg; Dirk Hempel; Michael P Lux; Laura L Michel; Wolfgang Janni; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Tanja N Fehm; Andreas Schneeweiss Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Jennifer L Caswell-Jin; Alison Callahan; Natasha Purington; Summer S Han; Haruka Itakura; Esther M John; Douglas W Blayney; George W Sledge; Nigam H Shah; Allison W Kurian Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2021-05
Authors: Andreas Schneeweiss; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Matthias Geberth; Lothar Häberle; Peyman Hadji; Andreas D Hartkopf; Carsten Hielscher; Jens Huober; Eugen Ruckhäberle; Wolfgang Janni; Hans Christian Kolberg; Christian M Kurbacher; Evelyn Klein; Michael P Lux; Volkmar Müller; Naiba Nabieva; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans Tesch; Elena Laakmann; Florin-Andrei Taran; Julia Seitz; Christoph Thomssen; Michael Untch; Pauline Wimberger; Rachel Wuerstlein; Bernhard Volz; Diethelm Wallwiener; Markus Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker Journal: Breast Date: 2020-08-29 Impact factor: 4.380