| Literature DB >> 24490173 |
Ahmet Ercan Sekerci1, Kenan Cantekin2, Mustafa Aydinbelge2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This is the first study to identify and classify the different morphological shapes of the mandibular lingula (ML) in children using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24490173 PMCID: PMC3893742 DOI: 10.1155/2013/825453
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the preparation of the samples was demonstrated.
Description of the 269 subjects and their indications for cone beam CT (CBCT) referral.
| Reason for Scan | No. of Subjects |
|---|---|
| Impaction localization | 19 |
| Orthodontic records | 178 |
| Other possible pathosis | 25 |
| Supernumerary teeth localization | 27 |
| TMJ assessment | 20 |
Figure 2Three-dimensional CBCT image of the internal surface of the mandible showing the measurement for localizing the position of the lingula, entrance of mandibular foramen from the various landmarks. The “x” measurement indicated the distance in millimetres found between the most anterior part of the mandibular lingula points to the anterior border of the mandibular ramus in a straight horizontal line; the “y” measurement represented the distance between the most posterior part of the mandibular lingula and foramen points to the posterior border of the mandibular ramus in the same horizontal orientation; the “w” measurement determined the distance between the lower point of the mandibular foramen and lingula points to the mandibular base in a vertical straight line; the “t” measurement determined the distance most anterior part of the mandibular lingula points to the alveolar socket of first mandibular molar tooth; the “z” measurement determined the distance between the same initial points as for the w distance to the lower point of the sigmoid notch. The horizontal distances were measured parallel to the occlusal plane (OP) of the molars, whereas the vertical distances were measured perpendicular to the occlusal plane of the molars. The ratio of (x) to (x + y1) was also calculated and used as an additional guide to localize the lingula [21]. Vertical distance from the tip of the lingula to the lower border of the mandibular foramen was measured as height of the lingula (h 1). The measurement included the distance from the lingula to the occlusal plane of the molars (h 2).
Figure 3Different shapes of lingulae (a) nodular; (b) triangular; (c) truncated; (d) assimilated.
Distribution and incidence (in parentheses) of lingula in girls and boys, bilateral or unilateral.
| Type | Shape | Girl | Boy | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( |
| Bilateral | Unilateral ( | Right | Left | |||||||
| Bilateral | Unilateral | Total | Bilateral | Unilateral | Total | ( | Right | Left | 269 | 269 | |||
| 1 | Triangular | 15 (10.4) | 20 (6.9) | 50 | 8 (6.4) | 8 (3.2) | 24 | 0,021* | 23 (13.0) | 16 (17.6) | 12 (13.2) | 39 (14.5) | 35 (13.0) |
| 2 | Truncated | 17 (11.8) | 32 (11.1) | 66 | 24 (19.2) | 12 (4.8) | 60 | 0,767 | 41(23.2) | 40 (44.0) | 4 (4.4) | 81 (30.1) | 45 (16.7) |
| 3 | Nodular | 36 (25.0) | 52 (18.1) | 124 | 57 (44.8) | 23 (9.2) | 137 | 0,011* | 93 (52.5) | 16 (17.6) | 59 (64.8) | 108 (40.1) | 152 ( 56.5) |
| 4 | Assimilated | 12 (8.3) | 24 (8.3) | 48 | 9 (9.6) | 11 (4.4) | 29 | 0,069 | 21 (11.9) | 19 (20.9) | 16 (17.6) | 41 (15.2) | 37 (13.8) |
*Statistically significance.
Distance of lingula from various ramal landmarks of 269 mandibula; distance from distal side of the alveolar socket of mandibular permanent first molar tooth and lingula ratio with their comparison between gender sides.
| Side | Gender | Minimum (mm) | Maximum (mm) | Mean (mm) | Std. deviation |
| Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (mm) | Std. deviation | ||||||||
| Distance from anterior border of ramus |
| 1 | 10,1 | 19,4 | 13,6 | 2,5 | 0,13 | 13,3 | 2,3 |
| 0 | 9 | 16,1 | 12,7 | 1,9 | |||||
|
| 1 | 10,2 | 19,5 | 14,1 | 2,1 | 0,054 | |||
| 0 | 9,3 | 18,9 | 12,8 | 2,5 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Distance from posterior border of ramus |
| 1 | 7,5 | 13,2 | 10,9 | 1,6 | 0,000* | 10,2 | 1,6 |
| 0 | 6,1 | 12,1 | 9,2 | 1,7 | |||||
|
| 1 | 8,7 | 13,8 | 11,3 | 1,5 | 0,015* | |||
| 0 | 7,6 | 12,8 | 10,2 | 1,5 | |||||
|
| 1 | 4,2 | 10,7 | 7,0 | 2,3 | 0,019* | 6,3 | 2,1 | |
| 0 | 2,6 | 9,9 | 5,6 | 1,9 | |||||
|
| 1 | 3,2 | 11,2 | 7,2 | 2,3 | 0,026* | |||
| 0 | 2,4 | 10,6 | 5,8 | 1,9 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Distance from mandibular notch |
| 1 | 8,2 | 18,2 | 12,6 | 2,5 | 0,06 | 11,4 | 2,5 |
| 0 | 7 | 17,6 | 11,2 | 2,5 | |||||
|
| 1 | 7,2 | 16,2 | 12,4 | 2,5 | 0,014* | |||
| 0 | 6,3 | 15,7 | 10,6 | 2,7 | |||||
|
| 1 | 13,2 | 24,4 | 17,9 | 3,0 | 0,041* | 16,7 | 3,4 | |
| 0 | 8,2 | 23,6 | 15,7 | 4,3 | |||||
|
| 1 | 8,4 | 22,5 | 17,8 | 3,2 | 0,005* | |||
| 0 | 6,6 | 22,5 | 15,0 | 3,7 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Distance from mandibular base |
| 1 | 19,9 | 28,1 | 23,6 | 2,2 | 0,039* | 23,1 | 3,2 |
| 0 | 11,9 | 25,9 | 21,7 | 4,0 | |||||
|
| 1 | 14,7 | 27,8 | 23,9 | 3,0 | 0,56 | |||
| 0 | 11,9 | 26,3 | 23,5 | 3,0 | |||||
|
| 1 | 12,5 | 23,8 | 18,3 | 2,8 | 0,29 | 17,9 | 3,0 | |
| 0 | 12,2 | 24,3 | 17,4 | 3,2 | |||||
|
| 1 | 11,9 | 23,4 | 18,2 | 2,9 | 0,71 | |||
| 0 | 12,7 | 22,8 | 17,9 | 3,0 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Distance from distal side of the alveolar socket of 1st mandibular molar tooth |
| 1 | 18,1 | 31,1 | 24,9 | 3,8 | 0,23 | 24,7 | 3,7 |
| 0 | 16,5 | 29,4 | 23,7 | 3,4 | |||||
|
| 1 | 16,1 | 32 | 25,5 | 4,2 | 0,41 | |||
| 0 | 17,9 | 30,9 | 24,7 | 3,5 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Height of the lingula |
| 1 | 3 | 9,7 | 5,6 | 1,4 | 0,027* | 5,3 | 1,6 |
| 0 | 2,3 | 8,3 | 4,7 | 1,5 | |||||
|
| 1 | 3,6 | 9,6 | 6,3 | 1,6 | 0,000* | |||
| 0 | 2,7 | 8,8 | 4,7 | 1,5 | |||||
|
| 1 | 1,3 | 5,1 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 0,74 | 2,0 | 1,2 | |
| 0 | 0,3 | 5,1 | 1,9 | 1,5 | |||||
|
| 1 | 0,2 | 4,7 | 2,2 | 1,1 | 0,2 | |||
| 0 | 0,2 | 4,6 | 1,6 | 1,3 | |||||
|
| |||||||||
| Lingula ratio: | right | 1 | 0,45 | 0,59 | 0,54 | 0,04 | 0,48 | 0,55 | 0.047 |
| 0 | 0,51 | 0,63 | 0,58 | 0,05 | |||||
| left | 1 | 0,44 | 0,61 | 0,53 | 0,05 | 0,52 | |||
| 0 | 0,49 | 0,62 | 0,55 | 0,048 | |||||
Groups: 1: boy, 0: girl.
*Statistically significance.
The most prevalent shape of lingula in reported studies.
| Authors | Reference | Year | Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tuli et al. | [ | 2000 | Triangular |
| Devi et al. | [ | 2003 | Truncated |
| Hossain et al. | [ | 2001 | Triangular |
| Murlimanju et al. | [ | 2012 | Triangular |
| Kositbowornchai et al. | [ | 2007 | Truncated |
| Nirmale et al. | [ | 2012 | Triangular |
| Lopes et al. | [ | 2010 | Triangular |
| Jansisyanont et al. | [ | 2009 | Truncated |
| Present study | Nodular |
Comparison of various studies on location of lingual.
| Authors | Reference | Study design | Population | Year | Distance from anterior border of ramus (mm) | Distance from posterior border of ramus (mm) | Distance from mandibular notch (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woo et al. | [ | Dry mandible | Korea | 2002 | 18.6 ± 2.5 | 16.1 ± 3.5 | 19.8 ± 5.1 |
| Kositbowornchai et al. | [ | Thai | 2007 | 20.7 ± 2.8 | 15.4 ± 1.9 | — | |
| Jansisyanont et al. | [ | Thai | 2009 | 20.6 ± 3.5 | 18.0 ± 2.6 | 16.6 ± 2.9 | |
| Samanta and Kharb | [ | India | 2012 | 20.0 ± 2.4 | 15.0 ± 2.7 | 15.4 ± 2.7 | |
| Monnazzi et al. | [ | Brazil | 2012 | 16.5 ± 2.3 | 14.6 ± 2.13 | 16.4 ± 2.6 | |
| Present study | CBCT | Turkey | 2013 | 13.3 ± 2.3 | 10.2 ± 1.6 | 11.4 ± 2.5 |