| Literature DB >> 24489960 |
Maria Rosa Pizzamiglio1, Laura Piccardi2, Filippo Bianchini3, Loredana Canzano3, Liana Palermo3, Francesca Fusco4, Giovanni D'Antuono1, Chiara Gelmini5, Livia Garavelli5, Matilde Valeria Ursini6.
Abstract
Studies suggest that genetic factors are associated with the etiology of learning disabilities. Incontinentia Pigmenti (IP, OMIM#308300), which is caused by mutations of the IKBKG/NEMO gene, is a rare X-linked genomic disorder (1:10000/20:000) that affects the neuroectodermal tissues. It always affects the skin and sometimes the hair, teeth, nails, eyes and central nervous system (CNS). Data from IP patients demonstrate the heterogeneity of the clinical phenotype; about 30% have CNS manifestations. This extreme variability suggests that IP patients might also have learning disabilities. However, no studies in the literature have evaluated the cognitive profile of IP patients. In fact, the learning disability may go unnoticed in general neurological analyses, which focus on major disabling manifestations of the CNS. Here, we investigated the neuropsychological outcomes of a selected group of IP-patients by focusing on learning disabilities. We enrolled 10 women with IP (7 without mental retardation and 3 with mild to severe mental retardation) whose clinical diagnosis had been confirmed by the presence of a recurrent deletion in the IKBKG/NEMO gene. The participants were recruited from the Italian patients' association (I.P.A.SS.I. Onlus). They were submitted to a cognitive assessment that included the Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale and a battery of tests examining reading, arithmetic and writing skills. We found that 7 patients had deficits in calculation/arithmetic reasoning and reading but not writing skills; the remaining 3 had severe to mild intellectual disabilities. Results of this comprehensive evaluation of the molecular and psychoneurological aspects of IP make it possible to place "learning disabilities" among the CNS manifestations of the disease and suggest that the IKBKG/NEMO gene is a genetic determinant of this CNS defect. Our findings indicate the importance of an appropriate psychoneurological evaluation of IP patients, which includes early assessment of learning abilities, to prevent the onset of this deficit.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24489960 PMCID: PMC3906222 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical manifestations in 10 female patients with IP: Clinical score analysis.
| Participants | Molecular defect of | Skin Defects | Ocular/Dental/Hair/Nail Defects | CNS Defects | Other Defects | Total Score Symptoms |
| Pt1 |
| 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Pt2 |
| 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Pt3 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Pt4 |
| 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Pt5 |
| 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Pt6 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Pt7 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Pt8 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Pt9 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Pt10 |
| 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 11 |
The score represents the number of clinical manifestations in each organ system.
Skin defects include: vesicles, pustules, hyperkeratotic lesions, pigmented spots, and hypopigmentation.
Ocular defects include: refractive errors; nystagmus, strabismus, optic atrophy, and iris pigmentary abnormalities.
Dental defects include: partial anodontia, dental dystrophy, dental pulp defects, cone/peg shaped teeth, malocclusion, and gingival defects.
Hair defects include: hair atrophy, alopecia, and wooly hair naevus.
Nail defects include: ungual dystrophy.
CNS (central nervous system) defects include: ischemia, seizures, and cerebral atrophy.
Other defects include: congenital clubfoot, frequent infections, vascular diseases, cranial asymmetry, and breast atrophy.
IP individuals' WAIS-R IQs and raw scores.
| Patients | Age (yrs) | Education (yrs) | IQ | Information | Digit Span | Vocabulary | Arithmetic | Comprehension | Similarities | VIQ | Picture Completion | Picture Arrangement | Block Design | Object Assembly | Digit Symbol | PIQ |
| Pt1 | 23 | 16 | 107 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 102 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 12 | 110 |
| Pt2 | 49 | 8 | 96 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 91 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 7 | 5 | 105 |
| Pt3 | 21 | 13 | 99 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 101 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 96 |
| Pt4 | 33 | 18 | 106 | 8 | 12 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 109 | 12 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 103 |
| Pt5 | 28 | 18 | 111 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 106 | 16 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 111 |
| Pt6 | 59 | 13 | 110 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 9 | 107 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 9 | 112 |
| Pt7 | 21 | 13 | 118 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 13 | 111 | 10 | 14 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 121 |
| Pt8 | 44 | 8 | 58 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 66 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 57 |
| Pt9 | 27 | 13 | 70 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 68 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 78 |
| Pt10 | 28 | 8 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 45 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 45 |
Table reports patients' IQ and subset scores on the WAIS-R.
Performance scores of seven educated IP participants with IQs above 70 on reading, writing and mathematics tests.
| Patient | Age (years) | FSIQ | Dictation | Reading (accuracy) | Reading (speed) | Reading (comprehension) | Arithmetic | Algebra | Geometry | Arithmetic Problems | Total Math Test | Mental Math (accuracy) | Mental Math (speed) | Arithmetic facts |
| Pt1 | 49 | 96 | np |
|
| −0.87# | np | np | np | np | np | np | np | np |
| Pt2 | 21 | 99 | 0.25 |
| 0.5 | 0.27 | −0.76# |
| −0.53# |
|
| 0.76 |
| −1.03# |
| Pt3 | 33 | 106 | 0.96 | 0.40 | −0.43 | 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.18 | 0.72 | 4.81 | 1.07 | 1.86 | 0.72 | 0.63 |
| Pt4 | 28 | 111 | 1.32 | −0.51# | 0.4 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 1.35 |
| −0.51# | 1.86 | −0.31# | 0.42 |
| Pt5 | 59 | 110 | 1.32 | 0.51 | −0.02 | 0.77 |
|
|
| 2.39 |
| 1.31 | 0# | 0.22 |
| Pt6 | 21 | 118 | 0.96 |
|
| −0.23 # |
| 0.64 |
|
|
| 0.76 | 0.61 | 0.22 |
| Pt7 | 23 | 107 | 0.6 | −0.85# | −0.47 | 1.27 |
| −0.27# |
| −0.83# |
| 0.20 | −0.59# | −1.45# |
*pathological performance; # borderline performance; np = test not performed.
Scores for learning abilities are z-scores; pathological performances are defined in accordance with the normative data of the tests.
Correlation between WAIS-R scales, learning tests and number of IP symptoms.
| FSIQ | VIQ | PIQ | Dictation | Reading -accuracy | Reading-speed | Reading -comprehension | Arithmetic | Algebra | Geometry | Arithmetical Problems | Total Math Test | Mental math -accuracy | Mental math-speed | Arithmetic facts | Number of IP symptoms | |
| FSIQ | 1 | .857 | .855 | .665 | .100 | −.628 | .258 | −.264 | .543 | −.343 | −.148 | −.086 | .079 | .606 | .515 | −.081 |
| VIQ | .857 | 1 | .489 | .657 | .222 | −.455 | .470 | .159 | .505 | −.065 | .362 | .388 | .467 | .952 | .848 | .028 |
| PIQ | .855 | .489 | 1 | .596 | .031 | −.717 | −.050 | −.458 | .449 | −.489 | −.211 | −.264 | −.103 | .468 | .333 | −.211 |
| Dictation | .665 | .657 | .596 | 1 | .644 | −.089 | −.082 | .101 | .171 | .190 | .248 | .288 | .661 | .508 | .797 | −.438 |
| Reading (accuracy) | .100 | .222 | .031 | .644 | 1 | .224 | .520 | .192 | −.123 | .339 | .716 | .494 | .581 | .282 | .442 | .149 |
| Reading (speed) | −.628 | −.455 | −.717 | −.089 | .224 | 1 | .091 | .339 | −.587 | .603 | −.054 | .091 | .316 | −.682 | −.173 | −.054 |
| Reading (comprehension) | .258 | .470 | −.050 | −.082 | .520 | .091 | 1 | −.183 | −.274 | .002 | .459 | .069 | −.158 | −.258 | −.392 | .629 |
| Arithmetic | −.264 | .159 | −.458 | .101 | .192 | .339 | −.183 | 1 | .364 | .925 | .229 | .889 | .765 | .230 | .495 | .125 |
| Algebra | .543 | .505 | .449 | .171 | −.123 | −.587 | −.274 | .364 | 1 | .202 | −.152 | .462 | .132 | .511 | .306 | .363 |
| Geometry | −.343 | −.065 | −.489 | .190 | .339 | .603 | .002 | .925 | .202 | 1 | .124 | .783 | .771 | −.037 | .384 | .152 |
| Arithmetical Problems | −.148 | .362 | −.211 | .248 | .716 | −.054 | .459 | .229 | −.152 | .124 | 1 | .559 | .434 | .567 | .423 | .091 |
| Total Math Test | −.086 | .388 | −.264 | .288 | .494 | .091 | .069 | .889 | .462 | .783 | .559 | 1 | .784 | .521 | .616 | .259 |
| Mental math (accuracy) | .079 | .467 | −.103 | .661 | .581 | .316 | −.158 | .765 | .132 | .771 | .434 | .784 | 1 | .439 | .855 | −.308 |
| Mental math (speed) | .606 | .952 | .468 | .508 | .282 | −.682 | −.258 | .230 | .511 | −.037 | .567 | .521 | .439 | 1 | .777 | −.193 |
| Arithmetic facts | .515 | .848 | .333 | .797 | .442 | −.173 | −.392 | .495 | .306 | .384 | .423 | .616 | .855 | .777 | 1 | −.507 |
| Number of IP symptoms | −.081 | .028 | −.211 | −.438 | .149 | −.054 | .629 | .125 | .363 | .152 | .091 | .259 | −.308 | −.193 | −.507 | 1 |
The numbers in the table indicate Pearson's correlation coefficients (r).
*p<0.05;
**p<0.01 FSIQ: Full scale IQ; VIQ: Verbal IQ; PIQ: Performance IQ.