Literature DB >> 24489955

Citrus sinensis annotation project (CAP): a comprehensive database for sweet orange genome.

Jia Wang1, Dijun Chen2, Yang Lei2, Ji-Wei Chang2, Bao-Hai Hao2, Feng Xing2, Sen Li2, Qiang Xu3, Xiu-Xin Deng3, Ling-Ling Chen2.   

Abstract

Citrus is one of the most important and widely grown fruit crop with global production ranking firstly among all the fruit crops in the world. Sweet orange accounts for more than half of the Citrus production both in fresh fruit and processed juice. We have sequenced the draft genome of a double-haploid sweet orange (C. sinensis cv. Valencia), and constructed the Citrus sinensis annotation project (CAP) to store and visualize the sequenced genomic and transcriptome data. CAP provides GBrowse-based organization of sweet orange genomic data, which integrates ab initio gene prediction, EST, RNA-seq and RNA-paired end tag (RNA-PET) evidence-based gene annotation. Furthermore, we provide a user-friendly web interface to show the predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs) and metabolic pathways in sweet orange. CAP provides comprehensive information beneficial to the researchers of sweet orange and other woody plants, which is freely available at http://citrus.hzau.edu.cn/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24489955      PMCID: PMC3905029          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Citrus is one of the most important and widely grown fruit crop in the world, with global production and total acreage ranking firstly among all the fruit crops. Citrus is a large genus with more than ten major species. Among them, sweet orange is responsible for about 60% of production for both fresh fruit and processed juice consumption [1]. Besides their economical and nutritional importance, Citrus fruits also have unique botanical characteristics such as nucellar embryony [2]. Normal sweet oranges are diploids with nine pair of chromosomes, and the estimated genome size is about 367 Mb [2]. Recently, we sequenced the draft genome of a double-haploid sweet orange (C. sinensis cv. Valencia) by using whole genome shotgun approach combined with long paired-end DNA sequencing technology [3]. The double-haploid genome was assembled to 4,811 scaffolds with N50 equal to 1.7 Mb. The total contig length (320.5 Mb) covers about 87% of the sweet orange genome, and scaffolds were aligned and oriented to the Citrus linkage map, about 80% of the assembled genome was anchored to nine pseudo-chromosomes [3]. An integrative strategy combining ab initio gene prediction, homology search, and experimental evidence including expressed sequence tags (ESTs), RNA-seq and RNA-paired end tags (RNA-PETs) was employed to annotate protein-coding genes in sweet orange genome, finally we obtained 29,445 protein-coding gene loci with 44,387 transcripts [3]. The availability of the sweet orange genome sequence provides a valuable genomic resource for citrus genetics and breeding improvement. To intuitively provide the sweet orange genome sequence and annotation, we constructed Citrus sinensis annotation project (CAP), which is a portal site for various types of sweet orange data. CAP provides an integrative platform for GBrowse-based organization of sweet orange genomic data and links many public databases, which includes overview of the pseudo-chromosomes and scaffolds, gene annotation containing ab initio gene prediction, EST, RNA-seq and RNA-PET evidence. Detailed protein coding gene information is provided in a keyword search system including predicted function, homologs in model plants, RNA and protein fold prediction and transcriptome evidence. In addition, we construct a user-friendly web interface to show the predicted protein-protein interactions (PPIs) in sweet orange, and supply metabolic pathways based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways [4]. CAP can provide comprehensive information beneficial to the researchers of sweet orange and other woody plants.

Results and Discussion

Gene annotation

Precise gene prediction is one of the most important goals in genome annotation. We combined ab initio gene finding programs and evidence-based annotation including homology searches, EST, RNA-Seq and RNA-PET experimental evidence to identify protein-coding genes in sweet orange genome. Detailed process is described in [3]. In CAP website, gene annotation page provides convenient searching items for gene information. Users can search the system by gene locus, Gene Ontology (GO) [5], InterPro category [6] or functional information. Comprehensive gene annotation is linked to public resources (Figure 1A). Figure 1B illustrates the detailed gene annotation, including functional information in SwissProt [7], othologs in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, inparalogs in sweet orange, KEGG orthologs [4], GO [5] and Mapman [8] category, protein fingerprints in PRINTS [9], protein families and domains in Pfam [10] and SUPFAM [11], prediction RNA fold and protein secondary structure, as well as RNA-seq Reads Per Kilo bases per Million (RPKM) values for different sweet orange tissues. For the annotated protein-coding gene models, 93.5% have RNA-seq evidence support, 78.2% is supported with proteins in public non-redundant database, and 66.7% is supported with EST evidence, only a very small fraction of genes are solely predicted with ab initio gene-finding programs [3]. Table 1 lists the statistical information for functions of the protein-coding genes. More than 18,000 sweet orange genes have homologs in public databases. Furthermore, more than 26,000 protein-coding genes contain protein family and domain information. Only 4,930 genes have no functional information, which are annotated as “hypothetical proteins or conserved hypothetical proteins” (Table 1).
Figure 1

The related public resources of CAP database and its gene annotation.

(A) The framework and linked public databases in CAP. (B) The major gene annotation page in CAP, including homologs, functional information, secondary structure and RNA-seq gene expression values in four tissues (callus, leaf, flower and fruit) and three mixtures of these tissues.

Table 1

Statistics of functional information for protein-coding genes in sweet orange.

CategoryDescriptionNumber
IHigh similarity to known proteins in SwissProt (identity >90%) (identity >50%)intellectual (identity >90%)524
IIMedium similarity to known proteins in SwissProt (identity >50%)10,613
IIILow similarity to known proteins (identity >30%)18,368
IVInterPro domain-containing protein26,916
VConserved hypothetical or hypothetical protein4,930

The related public resources of CAP database and its gene annotation.

(A) The framework and linked public databases in CAP. (B) The major gene annotation page in CAP, including homologs, functional information, secondary structure and RNA-seq gene expression values in four tissues (callus, leaf, flower and fruit) and three mixtures of these tissues.

GBrowse

It is well known that GBrowse is one of the most important genomic viewers for manipulating and displaying annotations on genomes [12], which has been extensively used to construct database for a variety of model organisms, such as Flybase [13], WormBase [14], SGD [15] and SilkDB [16]. CAP provides GBrowse-based integration of sweet orange genome annotation, including ab initio gene prediction, EST, RNA-seq and RNA-PET evidence-based gene annotation. Users can easily browse any interested regions in the sweet orange genome. According to the position on a scaffold, users can access a variety of track features, including scaffolds, protein-coding gene models, non-coding RNA, repetitive sequences, ab initio gene prediction, general information including GC content, 3-frame or 6-frame translation, RNA-seq and RNA-PET data from four sweet orange tissues (callus, leaf, flower and fruit) and three mixtures of these tissues, and ESTs from sweet orange and other citrus species (Figure 2A). Figure 2B illustrates a protein-coding gene Cs8g01880 in chromosome 8, detailed information includes the final gene model, RNA-seq and RNA-PET data from different tissues, ESTs from sweet orange and other citrus species, and four ab initio gene prediction tools, i.e., Genscan [17], GeneID [18], FgeneSH (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=fgenesh&group=programs&subgroup=gfind) and GlimmerHMM [19]. Gene mode page in GBrowse is available for each gene, including gene name, position, length, exon and intron position, 5′ and 3′ un-translated region, genomic sequence and transcripts (Figure 2C).
Figure 2

GBrowse in CAP.

(A) GBrowse tracks in CAP. The tracks include general overview, gene model, RNA-seq, RNA-PET and EST evidence. (B) Graphic example of Cs8g1880 gene annotation in GBrowse. Gene model shows the exon-intron structure of the gene. Gene predictor shows the prediction results of some ab initio gene-finding programs. RNA-seq, RNA-PET and EST are the experimental evidence to support the gene model. (C) Text file of Cs8g1880 gene model in GBrowse.

GBrowse in CAP.

(A) GBrowse tracks in CAP. The tracks include general overview, gene model, RNA-seq, RNA-PET and EST evidence. (B) Graphic example of Cs8g1880 gene annotation in GBrowse. Gene model shows the exon-intron structure of the gene. Gene predictor shows the prediction results of some ab initio gene-finding programs. RNA-seq, RNA-PET and EST are the experimental evidence to support the gene model. (C) Text file of Cs8g1880 gene model in GBrowse.

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs)

The sweet orange PPI network is predicted with ortholog-based and domain-combination methods, and then K-nearest neighbors (KNN) method is used to verify and filter the predicted PPIs, the final PPI network contains 124,491 interactions involving 8,195 proteins [20]. The web interface of PPI is constructed with JAVA and hosted on an Apache web server. The gene search page is linked to PPI, users can also submit one or more gene ID numbers to PPI search page, and then the server will return proteins that interact with the query proteins. The query protein and its interaction partners are visualized with Cytoscape software [21]. Figure 3A shows the PPI network of Cs8g02750.1 and Cs4g05680.2, Cs8g02750.1 is a proteasome subunit with 112 interacting partners, and Cs4g05680.2 is a serine/threonine-protein kinase with 236 interacting proteins. The two proteins have common and specific protein interactions. Cs8g02750.1 mainly interacts with other proteasome subunit proteins, while Cs4g05680.2 contains a wide variety of interacting partners, including many protein kinases, ribosomal proteins, 14-3-3 proteins, v-ATPases, tubulin proteins etc. In Figure 3A, nodes are colored according to Mapman functional categories [8]. Solid line between two nodes indicates interaction predicted with ortholog-based method, and dash line indicates interaction predicted with domain-combination method. Thickness and color of the solid line denotes different score levels, the higher the orthologous score, the thicker the line is. If a user clicks a node in the PPI network, its Mapman annotation, functional information and expression value will be shown (Figure 3A).
Figure 3

The predicted protein interactions and KEGG pathway in CAP.

(A) The predicted PPI network of Cs8g02750.1 and Cs4g05680.2. (B) Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) metabolic pathway in sweet orange.

The predicted protein interactions and KEGG pathway in CAP.

(A) The predicted PPI network of Cs8g02750.1 and Cs4g05680.2. (B) Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) metabolic pathway in sweet orange.

Metabolic pathways

KEGG pathway maps are graphical diagrams representing knowledge of reaction networks for metabolism, and each map summarizes experimental evidence in published literatures [4]. Based on KEGG Orthology (KO) groups, we obtained the KEGG orthologous genes in sweet orange genome, and generated the sweet orange metabolic pathways. KEGG modules in each pathway map are produced by converting nodes to gene identifier nodes and colored in blue. Sweet orange pathways include four categories, i.e., metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing and cellular processes. Each category contains many pathways. When a user clicks a pathway, the reference KEGG pathway will be shown, and enzymes or proteins which have KEGG orthologs in sweet orange are colored in blue. Figure 3B shows the metabolic pathway of citrate cycle (TCA cycle). When mouse moves to an enzyme with blue color, orthologs in sweet orange and their expression values in different tissues are shown, which are also linked to the corresponding gene annotation.

Search modules

CAP provides various query interface and graphical visualization to facilitate the retrieve and demonstration of sweet orange data. As mentioned above, “gene search” is the principal search system, which allows users to enter keywords such as gene locus, GO [5] or InterPro category [6], and functional information. The retrieving result links to GBrowse and PPI. Users can also submit the gene locus to search its protein interaction in the PPI menu. In addition, users can perform a BLAST sequence search to retrieve homologous sequences in sweet orange genome. BLAST search results include graphical summary of the sequence alignment, briefly and detailed description of the alignment. All the search results performed by the above search modules can be further used for functional investigation.

Conclusions

The present work provides a comprehensive collection of sweet orange genomic and transcriptomic data, which are organized and deposited in an online database CAP. Convenient web interface is designed to show gene annotation, protein interaction and metabolic pathway. CAP serves the plant research community by providing a reference genome and annotation for sweet orange. In the near future, CAP will collect the experimentally validated data for sweet orange genes. In addition, small RNA and degradome sequencing data will be added to CAP. New high-throughput DNA-sequencing technologies are being developed and it is expected that the number of Citrus species sequences will grow rapidly. These new sequences will be incorporated into the CAP by comparison to the C. sinensis reference genome in the future. With the update of sweet orange genome annotation, CAP will update to new version.

Methods

Data source and website architecture

The genomic data for sweet orange has been submitted to NCBI GenBank under the accession number AJPS00000000 and BioProject ID PRJNA86123. The raw data for sweet orange genome sequencing, assembling and annotation are available from sweet orange annotation project [3]. All the data are organized and stored in MySQL database (http://www.mysql.com/). Besides, the sequence information and functional annotation for protein-coding genes are provided in CAP. A genome browser is developed on the basis of GBrowse [12]. CAP is implemented in JSP language and deployed on Apache Tomcat web server (http://tomcat.apache.org/). The integrated network browser is created by Cytoscape web program (http://cytoscapeweb.cytoscape.org/) [21]. The architecture and linked public databases are shown in Figure 1A. CAP can be accessed through IE 6.0 or higher, Netscape 7.0 or higher, Safari, Opera, Chrome and Firefox from multiple platforms. JavaScript is required to use all the functions of CAP.

Gene annotation and linked databases

SwissProt homologs are obtained by using BLASTP based on bi-directional best hit (BBH) method to search against UniProtKB/SwissProt [7]. Thresholds for BLASTP search are sequence coverage >0.7, identity >30%, e value <1e-10 and bit-score >60. Pfam category is predicted by using hmmer program [22]. Mapman annotation is obtained using BLASTP based on BBH method between A. thaliana and sweet orange genes. Gene3D, InterPro, PRINTS and SUPFAM annotation is predicted with Interproscan program [6]. RNA secondary structure is predicted with RNAfold program in ViennaRNA [23], and protein secondary structure is predicted with Psipred program [24]. Gene annotation in CAP is linked to many public databases. For example, Orthologs in A. thaliana and O. sativa are linked to gene model in TAIR [25] and MSU rice gene models (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/), respectively. GO annotation links to gene ontology in EMBL database (http://www.embl.org/), Gene3D links to the corresponding CATH Superfamily (http://www.cathdb.info/), InterPro links to EMBL database (http://www.cathdb.info/), PRINTS links to SPRINT database (http://www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/dbbrowser/sprint/), Pfam links to corresponding Pfam category (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/), and SUPFAM links to superfamily database (http://supfam.org/).
  23 in total

1.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Computational gene annotation in new genome assemblies using GeneID.

Authors:  Enrique Blanco; Josep F Abril
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

3.  MAPMAN: a user-driven tool to display genomics data sets onto diagrams of metabolic pathways and other biological processes.

Authors:  Oliver Thimm; Oliver Bläsing; Yves Gibon; Axel Nagel; Svenja Meyer; Peter Krüger; Joachim Selbig; Lukas A Müller; Seung Y Rhee; Mark Stitt
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  The PRINTS database: a fine-grained protein sequence annotation and analysis resource--its status in 2012.

Authors:  Teresa K Attwood; Alain Coletta; Gareth Muirhead; Athanasia Pavlopoulou; Peter B Philippou; Ivan Popov; Carlos Romá-Mateo; Athina Theodosiou; Alex L Mitchell
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools.

Authors:  Philippe Lamesch; Tanya Z Berardini; Donghui Li; David Swarbreck; Christopher Wilks; Rajkumar Sasidharan; Robert Muller; Kate Dreher; Debbie L Alexander; Margarita Garcia-Hernandez; Athikkattuvalasu S Karthikeyan; Cynthia H Lee; William D Nelson; Larry Ploetz; Shanker Singh; April Wensel; Eva Huala
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The Pfam protein families database.

Authors:  Marco Punta; Penny C Coggill; Ruth Y Eberhardt; Jaina Mistry; John Tate; Chris Boursnell; Ningze Pang; Kristoffer Forslund; Goran Ceric; Jody Clements; Andreas Heger; Liisa Holm; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Sean R Eddy; Alex Bateman; Robert D Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0.

Authors:  Ronny Lorenz; Stephan H Bernhart; Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen; Hakim Tafer; Christoph Flamm; Peter F Stadler; Ivo L Hofacker
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations.

Authors:  Susan Tweedie; Michael Ashburner; Kathleen Falls; Paul Leyland; Peter McQuilton; Steven Marygold; Gillian Millburn; David Osumi-Sutherland; Andrew Schroeder; Ruth Seal; Haiyan Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Using GBrowse 2.0 to visualize and share next-generation sequence data.

Authors:  Lincoln D Stein
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  WormBase 2007.

Authors:  Anthony Rogers; Igor Antoshechkin; Tamberlyn Bieri; Darin Blasiar; Carol Bastiani; Payan Canaran; Juancarlos Chan; Wen J Chen; Paul Davis; Jolene Fernandes; Tristan J Fiedler; Michael Han; Todd W Harris; Ranjana Kishore; Raymond Lee; Sheldon McKay; Hans-Michael Müller; Cecilia Nakamura; Philip Ozersky; Andrei Petcherski; Gary Schindelman; Erich M Schwarz; Will Spooner; Mary Ann Tuli; Kimberly Van Auken; Daniel Wang; Xiaodong Wang; Gary Williams; Karen Yook; Richard Durbin; Lincoln D Stein; John Spieth; Paul W Sternberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

1.  Systems biology study of transcriptional and post-transcriptional co-regulatory network sheds light on key regulators involved in important biological processes in Citrus sinensis.

Authors:  Ehsan Khodadadi; Ali Ashraf Mehrabi; Ali Najafi; Saber Rastad; Ali Masoudi-Nejad
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  CsWAKL08, a pathogen-induced wall-associated receptor-like kinase in sweet orange, confers resistance to citrus bacterial canker via ROS control and JA signaling.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Anhua Hu; Jingjing Qi; Wanfu Dou; Xiujuan Qin; Xiuping Zou; Lanzhen Xu; Shanchun Chen; Yongrui He
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.793

3.  Genomewide analysis of the CIII peroxidase family in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and expression profiles induced by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and hormones.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Wanfu Dou; Jingjing Qi; Xiujuan Qin; Shanchun Chen; Yongrui He
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.166

4.  Citrus carotenoid isomerase gene characterization by complementation of the "Micro-Tom" tangerine mutant.

Authors:  Thaísa T Pinheiro; Lázaro E P Peres; Eduardo Purgatto; Rodrigo R Latado; Rodolfo A Maniero; Mônica M Martins; Antonio Figueira
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Genome-Wide Characterization and Expression Analysis of Major Intrinsic Proteins during Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osb.).

Authors:  Cristina de Paula Santos Martins; Andresa Muniz Pedrosa; Dongliang Du; Luana Pereira Gonçalves; Qibin Yu; Frederick G Gmitter; Marcio Gilberto Cardoso Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Annotation of gene function in citrus using gene expression information and co-expression networks.

Authors:  Darren C J Wong; Crystal Sweetman; Christopher M Ford
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Genome-wide classification and evolutionary and expression analyses of citrus MYB transcription factor families in sweet orange.

Authors:  Xiao-Jin Hou; Si-Bei Li; Sheng-Rui Liu; Chun-Gen Hu; Jin-Zhi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Construction of citrus gene coexpression networks from microarray data using random matrix theory.

Authors:  Dongliang Du; Nidhi Rawat; Zhanao Deng; Fred G Gmitter
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.793

9.  Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) Constitutes a Large and Diverse Family of Proteins Involved in Development and Abiotic Stress Responses in Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osb.).

Authors:  Andresa Muniz Pedrosa; Cristina de Paula Santos Martins; Luana Pereira Gonçalves; Marcio Gilberto Cardoso Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genomic Analysis of Terpene Synthase Family and Functional Characterization of Seven Sesquiterpene Synthases from Citrus sinensis.

Authors:  Berta Alquézar; Ana Rodríguez; Marcos de la Peña; Leandro Peña
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.