Literature DB >> 24489730

Small activating RNA restores the activity of the tumor suppressor HIC-1 on breast cancer.

Feng Zhao1, Shengli Pan2, Yan Gu1, Shanyu Guo1, Qiancheng Dai1, Yingyan Yu2, Wei Zhang1.   

Abstract

HIC-1 is a gene that is hypermethylated in cancer, and commonly downregulated in human breast cancer. However, the precise mechanisms and molecular pathways regulated by HIC-1 remain unclear. We assessed HIC-1 expression on a tissue microarray containing 80 cases of breast cancer. We also analyzed its biological function by restoring HIC-1 expression using 5-aza-2' deoxycytidine (5-CdR) and small-activating RNAs for the reversal of HIC-1 tumor suppressive effects on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines. An Agilent Q44h global expressing microarray was probed after restoring the expression of HIC-1. Data demonstrated that HIC-1 expression was reduced significantly in breast cancer tissues. HIC-1 immunohistochemistry resulted in mean staining scores in cancer tissue and normal ductal epithelia of 3.54 and 8.2, respectively (p<0.01). 5-CdR partially reversed HIC-1 expression, and modulated cell growth and apoptosis. dsHIC1-2998, an saRNA, showed activating efficacy in breast cancer cells. A group of differentially expressed genes were characterized by cDNA microarray. Upon saRNA treatment, genes upregulated included those involved in immune activation, cell cycle interference, the induction of apoptosis, anti-metastasis, and cell differentiation. Downregulated genes included oncogenes and those that play roles in cell invasion, cell growth, and cell division. Our findings may provide valuable resources not only for gene functional studies, but also for potential clinical applications to develop novel drug targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24489730      PMCID: PMC3904905          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and severely influences public health. Currently, operation combined with chemotherapy or targeted therapy remains the major strategy for breast cancer treatment. Targeted therapeutic strategies include the use of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, cell cycle inhibitors, apoptosis promoters, and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors [1−8]. Agents targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor HER 2, epidermal growth factor receptor 1 (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and cell cycle regulators are being integrated into therapeutic studies with the goal of improving therapeutic efficacy and patient outcome. Approximately 25−30% of breast cancers that overexpress HER-2 will respond positively to HER-2 targeted therapies such as Trastuzumab. However, some patients develop resistance to Trastuzumab within one year of treatment [9]. Therefore, it is important to explore new molecular targets and develop novel targeted drugs for the treatment of breast cancer patients. In addition to the HER-2 gene, several other important genes closely related to breast carcinogenesis such as BRCA1, P53, HIC-1, and TOP2A are also located on chromosome 17 [10]. HIC-1 is a tumor suppressor gene that is expressed at low levels in breast cancer and other malignancies due to epigenetic silencing [11−16]. However, the precise molecular pathways and functional mechanisms that regulate its expression are poorly understood. Several successful molecularly targeted drugs have been developed, including Trastuzumab (Herceptin), Gefitinib (Iressa), and Bevacizumab (Avastin). 5-aza-2′deoxycytidine (5-CdR) is a non-specific demethylation drug that can reactivate tumor suppressor genes by demethylation. In 2006 and 2007, two reports from the Li and Janowski groups revealed that double-stranded small RNA (dsRNA) molecules could activate the expression of target genes by binding to the promoter region upstream of the transcription start site [17], [18]. These important findings open the door for gene therapies targeting tumor suppressor genes. They termed the dsRNAs as small activating RNA (saRNA) and the molecular event RNA activation (RNAa), which is the opposite of the classical phenomenon of RNA interference (RNAi) [19−21]. To verify the efficacy of saRNAs on hypermethylated tumor suppressors, we previously created several saRNAs targeted to the HIC-1 promoter and assessed the effect of re-expression on gastric cancer. Our study indicated that saRNA-mediated the re-expression of HIC-1 and inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and clonogenicity, and induced apoptosis. Therefore, HIC-1 is a potential target for gene therapy in gastric cancer, and saRNAs could present a novel therapeutic option for upregulating tumor suppressor genes [22]. In the present study, we assessed HIC-1 as a candidate therapeutic target and observed altered cellular functions after the re-expression of HIC-1 in breast cancer cells. Several saRNAs were used for RNA activation in combination with 5-CdR treatment in breast cancer. To clarify the molecular mechanisms and related pathways modulated by HIC-1 activation, we also screened the differentially expressed genes by whole transcriptomic microarray.

Materials and Methods

Tissue microarray, cell lines, and reagents

A breast cancer tissue microarray (OD-CT-RpBre01-003) was purchased from Outdo Biotech Co, Ltd. (Shanghai, China), which contains 80 breast cancer samples from patients aged 33−81 years (average 55). Ten samples had paired adjacent normal breast tissue. Fifty-five cases were invasive ductal carcinoma, six were invasive lobular carcinoma, nine mucinous carcinomas, four medullary carcinomas, three lipid-rich carcinomas, and three were intraductal carcinoma. The breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 were purchased from the Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences Type Culture Collection Committee. The human normal mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A was obtained from Shanghai Institute of Breast Cancer. DMEM medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and horse serum were purchased from Hyclone (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). 5-CdR was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA), dissolved in PBS to make a 10 mM stock solution, and stored at −80°C. Complete medium was diluted to working concentrations before use. TRIzol was purchased from Invitrogen (USA). The CCK-8 kit was purchased from Dojindo (Japan). RT-PCR and MSP kits were purchased from TaKaRa (Japan). DNA extraction and bisulfate conversion kit were purchased from Qiagen (Germany). RT-PCR and MSP primers were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Ltd.

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent for the study was obtained from all participants. The ethics committee of Outdo Biotech Co, Ltd., Shanghai, approved the study protocol.

Immunohistochemistry for HIC-1 staining

Tissue microarrays were de-waxed, and hydrated using alcohol. Antigen retrieval was performed using citrate buffer, and endogenous peroxide activity was blocked with a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. Mouse anti-human HIC-1 monoclonal antibody (1∶100, ab55120, Abcam, UK) was added, followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h, and three washes with 1× PBS for 5 min. Then EnVision two-step reagents (Dako) were then incubated at 37°C for 30 min. DAB was used for signal detection, and hematoxylin was used for nuclear staining. HIC-1 expression in the nucleus or cytoplasm was judged to be positive. Tissue microarrays were scored according to the proportion of positive cells and staining intensity. For cell proportion scoring, positive cells <10% = 0, 10−30% = 1, 31−50% = 2, and >50% as 3. In staining intensity scoring, no stain = 0, pale yellow = 1, brown/yellow = 2, and dark brown = 3. The final scores were obtained by multiplying the two. Scores of 1−4 were weakly positive, and >6 designated retained expression.

Cell culture and methylation analysis

We resuspended MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, and 2×105 cells were seeded at 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2. Media containing 5, 10, 20, 40, or 80 µM 5-CdR were added, and cells were incubated for at least 24 h. At days 2, 4, and 5, cells were harvested, and genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit. DNA was treated with sodium bisulfate following the specifications provided. The primer sequences for methylated HIC-1 promoter were F (5′-TCGGTTTTCGCGTTTTGTTCGT-3′), R (5′-AACCGAAAACTATAAACCCTCG-3′) with a 95 bp amplification product. The primer sequences for the unmethylated HIC-1 promoter were F (5′-TTGGGTTTGGTTTTTGTGTTTTG-3′), and R (5′-CACCCTAACACCACCCTAAC-3′), with a 181 bp amplification product. Reactions were hot-started at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 62°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels, stained with GelRed, and visualized by UV illumination.

mRNA analysis

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol and reverse transcribed using PrimeScript® RT master mix random primers. RT-PCR was performed using EmeraldAmp® PCR Master Mix. The primer sequences for the RT-PCR reactions were follows: HIC-1 F (5′-GTCGTGCGACAAGAGCTACAA-3′), R (5′-CGTTGCTGTGCGAACTTGC-3′), which amplify a 282 bp product. GAPDH: F (5′-CCTGCACCACCAACTGCTTA-3′), R (5′-AGGCCATGCCAGTGAGCTT-3′), giving a 178 bp product. Reactions were hot-started at 98°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 98°C for 30 s, 60/55°C (HIC-1/GAPDH) for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed on 1.5% agarose gels, stained with GelRed, and visualized by UV illumination.

Cell proliferation assay (CCK-8)

Cell Counting Kit 8 was used to assess cell proliferation. Briefly, control and treated cancer cells (2×103 cells/well) were seeded onto 96-well plates. At the specified time points, 10 µl of CCK-8 solution was added to each well of the plate, and then incubated for 2 h. Cell viability was determined by measuring the OD at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

Apoptosis assay

Experimental cells were treated with 5-CdR or medium daily for 5 days. Then, cells were collected and washed. Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) was assayed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were washed with PBS and resuspended in 1× binding buffer at a concentration of 1×106 cells/ml. Next, 5 µl of FITC Annexin V and 5 µl of PI were added to 100 µl of the cell suspension, and incubated for 15 min in the dark. After incubation, 400 µl 1× binding buffer was added, and apoptotic cells were analyzed using a FACScan flow cytometer (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA).

saRNA design and transfection

All dsRNAs targeting the region upstream of the transcriptional start site of human HIC-1 were designed based on the rational design rules [17], [23]. Four dsRNAs targeting the −3000 bp upstream region from the transcription start site (TSS) of the HIC-1 gene were designed and synthesized (Shanghai Genepharma Company, China). dsRNA targeting −29 (dsHIC1-29): F- CAGAUAAGAGUGUGCGGAATT, R- UUCCGCACACUCUUAUCUGTT. dsRNA targeting −1873 (dsHIC1-1873): F- GGGAUCUGACUCUAUCAAATT, R- UUUGAUAGAGUCAGAUCCCTT. dsRNA targeting −2873 (dsHIC1-2873): F- AGAUGGAGGAAGGGUCUAATT, R- UUAGACCCUUCCUCCAUCUTT. dsRNA targeting −2998 (dsHIC1-2998): F- CGGUUUCCUGGAGAAGUUATT, R- UAACUUCUCCAGGAAACCGTT. dsRNA for negative control (dscontrol): F- ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT, R- UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT. MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were trypsinized, diluted in growth medium without antibiotics, and seeded in 6-well plates (4.0×105 cells/well). dsRNAs were transfected at a concentration of 50 nM/L using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) according to the reverse transfection protocol provided with the product. The cells were harvested 3−5 days after transfection for further analysis.

Gene chip experiment

A functional small RNA fragment of dsHIC1-2998 was transfected into MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Cells were harvested 96 h after transfection and washed twice with PBS. Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Cat#15596-018, Life Technologies) following the manufacturer's instructions, and an RNA integrity number (RIN) was assigned to assess RNA integration using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, US). Qualified total RNA was further purified using a RNeasy micro kit (Cat#74004, Qiagen, GmBH, Germany) and RNase-Free DNase Set (Cat# 79254, Qiagen). Total RNA was amplified and labeled by Low Input Quick Amp Labeling Kit, One-Color (Cat# 5190-2305, Agilent), following the manufacturer's instructions. Labeled cRNAs were purified using an RNeasy mini kit (Cat#74106, Qiagen). Each slide (Agilent human whole genome 4*44 chip) was hybridized with 1.65 µg Cy3-labeled cRNA using a Gene Expression Hybridization Kit (Cat#5188-5242, Agilent) in a hybridization oven (Cat# G2545A, Agilent), according to the manufacturer's instructions. After a 17 h hybridization, slides were washed in staining dishes (Cat#121, Thermo Shandon, Waltham, MA, US) with Gene Expression Wash Buffer Kit (Cat#5188-5327, Agilent), following the manufacturer's instructions. Slides were scanned using an Agilent Microarray Scanner (Cat#G2565CA, Agilent) with default settings: dye channels: green, scan resolution = 5 µm, PMT 100%, 10%, 16 bit. Data were extracted using Feature Extraction software 10.7 (Agilent). Raw data were normalized using the Quantile algorithm, Gene Spring Software 11.0 (Agilent). Welch's t-tests and the Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) tests were used to identify genes that were differentially expressed in the trial subjects of each category, and P<0.01 and fold-changes ≥2 or ≤−2 were used as the filters for screening genes. A two-way clustering algorithm was used to analyze the distribution of samples and genes. Microarray data were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (accession ID:GSE42024).

Activating efficacy of HIC-1 by quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies). Real-time PCR amplification of the cDNA was performed in a reaction mixture with a final volume of 20 µl containing 10 µl of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA), 1 µl of 5 mM/L each paired primer specific to target gene, and 1 µl of cDNA. The primers used for real time PCR were: HIC-1 forward, 5′- TAAATCGGGAGAGTGTGCTGGGC-3′, and reverse, 5′- GTGCGCTGGTTGTTGAGCTGC-3; GAPDH forward, 5′- GGACCTGACCTGCCGTCTAG-3′, and reverse, 5′- GTAGCCCAGGATGCCCTTGA-3′.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSS 15.0. The measurement data were analyzed by t-test, and numeration data were analyzed using the fourfold table χ2 test or Fisher's exact test. Differences were considered significant at P<0.05.

Results

HIC-1 protein expression in breast cancer tissue arrays

Staining was judged to be positive when yellow or brown granules appeared in the nucleus or cytoplasm of cells. Based on HIC-1 immunohistochemistry, a final score<4 was considered to be decreased expression (Figure 1A), and a final score>6 as retained expression. HIC-1 protein expression was strongly positive in normal breast epithelial tissue (Figure 1B). The average score of 10 samples of paired normal breast epithelial was 8.2. The expression of HIC-1 protein was reduced significantly in breast cancer tissue. In 80 breast cancer samples, 55 (62.5%) exhibited low-expression, and 25 positive expression. The average score of HIC-1 expression was 3.54±1.46 in breast cancer. There was a significant difference in HIC-1 expression between cancerous and normal breast tissue (8.2±1.75, P<0.001, Figure 1C). Of the breast cancer samples, 55 were primary breast cancer without metastasis, and 25 exhibited metastasis in the axillary lymph nodes. The correlation between HIC-1 protein expression and clinicopathological parameters is shown in Table 1. There was no significant relationship between HIC-1 protein expression, tumor location, lymph node metastasis, and histological sub-type. However, HIC-1 protein expression was significant correlated with patient age (Figure 1D). The expression level of HIC-1 was higher in younger patients than in older patients (P<0.05).
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical staining and scoring analysis of HIC-1 in breast cancer tissues and adjacent normal breast tissue.

A. HIC-1 protein expression was decreased in breast cancer tissue (400×). B. The expression of HIC-1 protein was strong in normal breast epithelial tissue (400×). C. Bar chart of immunohistochemical scores. Normal breast epithelial tissue scored 8.2±1.75 points, whereas the average score of breast cancer was 3.54±1.46. There were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.001). D. The expression of HIC-1 was higher in younger patients compared with older patients (P<0.05).

Table 1

HIC-1 protein expression and clinical pathology parameters.

ParameterDecreased expressionRetained expression P value
Age
<40350.044
>415220
Location
Left breast32110.238
Right breast2314
Histology
Invasive ductal carcinoma38170.549
Invasive lobular carcinoma33
Others145
Lymph node metastasis
Negative37180.672
Positive187

Immunohistochemical staining and scoring analysis of HIC-1 in breast cancer tissues and adjacent normal breast tissue.

A. HIC-1 protein expression was decreased in breast cancer tissue (400×). B. The expression of HIC-1 protein was strong in normal breast epithelial tissue (400×). C. Bar chart of immunohistochemical scores. Normal breast epithelial tissue scored 8.2±1.75 points, whereas the average score of breast cancer was 3.54±1.46. There were significant differences between the two groups (P<0.001). D. The expression of HIC-1 was higher in younger patients compared with older patients (P<0.05).

5-CdR treatment partially restored HIC-1 expression in breast cancer cell lines

MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells were treated with 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, or 80 µM 5-CdR for 5 days. Although unmethylated bands were detected with increasing drug concentrations, the methylated HIC-1 promoter region could not be eliminated completely in either cell line (Figure 2A). This suggests that 5-CdR partially reversed the methylation of the HIC-1 promoter. After 5-CdR treatment for 5 days, HIC-1 expression increased gradually in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2B), suggesting that (in addition to de-methylation) the expression of the HIC-1 gene was restored gradually. We analyzed the proliferation curves of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 20 and 5 µM 5-CdR, respectively, and observed that cell growth was inhibited significantly in both cancer cells from day 3 of 5-CdR treatment (Figure 2C, P<0.05).
Figure 2

The effects of different concentrations of 5-CdR on HIC-1 gene expression.

A. Unmethylated bands appeared gradually with increasing drug concentrations. However, the methylation of the HIC-1 promoter region could not be eliminated completely (upper, MCF-7; lower, MDA-MB-231). M: methylated band (95 bp), U: unmethylated band (181 bp). B. After 5-CdR treatment for 5 days, HIC-1 expression was increased gradually in a concentration-dependent manner. C. Cell proliferation curves of MCF-7 (upper) and MBA-MB-231 cells (lower) after treatment with 20 and 5 µM 5-CdR respectively. Cell growth was inhibited significantly in both cancer cell lines from day 3 of 5-CdR treatment. D. The total apoptosis in MCF-7 cells (top) was increased significantly, compared with the control group after treatment with 5, 20, and 80 µM 5-CdR for 5 days (10±1.44%, 14.25±0.82%, and 17.66±1.53%, respectively, vs. 6.53%±1.38%, P<0.05). The total percentage of apoptotic MDA-MB-231 cells (lower) was also increased significantly compared with control (19.63±1.58%, 24.11±1.03%, and 29.29±1.14%, respectively, vs. 6.48±1.37%, P<0.05).

The effects of different concentrations of 5-CdR on HIC-1 gene expression.

A. Unmethylated bands appeared gradually with increasing drug concentrations. However, the methylation of the HIC-1 promoter region could not be eliminated completely (upper, MCF-7; lower, MDA-MB-231). M: methylated band (95 bp), U: unmethylated band (181 bp). B. After 5-CdR treatment for 5 days, HIC-1 expression was increased gradually in a concentration-dependent manner. C. Cell proliferation curves of MCF-7 (upper) and MBA-MB-231 cells (lower) after treatment with 20 and 5 µM 5-CdR respectively. Cell growth was inhibited significantly in both cancer cell lines from day 3 of 5-CdR treatment. D. The total apoptosis in MCF-7 cells (top) was increased significantly, compared with the control group after treatment with 5, 20, and 80 µM 5-CdR for 5 days (10±1.44%, 14.25±0.82%, and 17.66±1.53%, respectively, vs. 6.53%±1.38%, P<0.05). The total percentage of apoptotic MDA-MB-231 cells (lower) was also increased significantly compared with control (19.63±1.58%, 24.11±1.03%, and 29.29±1.14%, respectively, vs. 6.48±1.37%, P<0.05).

5-CdR treatment induced apoptosis in breast cancer cell lines

Apoptosis was assessed in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells after treatment with 5, 20 or 80 µM 5-CdR for 5 days. The total apoptosis was increased significantly in MCF-7 cells compared with control (10±1.44%, 14.25±0.82%, and 17.66±1.53% vs. 6.53±1.38%, P<0.05). Similarly, the total apoptosis was also increased in MDA-MB-231 cells compared with control (19.63±1.58%, 24.11±1.03% and 29.29±1.14% vs. 6.48±1.37%, P<0.05) (Figure 2D). This suggests that restoring HIC-1 expression induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells.

saRNA restored HIC-1 expression in breast cancer cells

Four candidate saRNAs were synthesized that targeted the promoter regions of −29 (dsHIC1-29), −1873 (dsHIC1-1873), −2873 (dsHIC1-2873), and −2998 (dsHIC1-2998). As shown in Figure 3A, all the binding sites for saRNAs were distant from the CpG islands of the HIC-1 promoter. Four saRNAs were transfected into MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, and HIC-1 mRNA expression was assessed by quantitative RT-PCR 4 days after transfection. In MCF-7 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were upregulated 6.52-fold by dsHIC1-2998 transfection compared with mock (P<0.01). In contrast, dsHIC1-29, dsHIC1-1873, and dsHIC1-2873 did not affect HIC-1 mRNA levels significantly (Figure 3B). Similarly in MDA-MB-231 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were upregulated 3.37-fold by dsHIC1-2998 compared with mock (P<0.01). In contrast, dsHIC1-29, dsHIC1-1873, and dsHIC1-2873 did not alter HIC-1 mRNA levels significantly (Figure 3C). Therefore, dsHIC1-2998 was selected as the effective saRNA for additional studies.
Figure 3

Restoration of HIC-1 expression by saRNA (dsHIC1-2998) in breast cancer cells.

A. The binding sites of four saRNAs targeting the HIC-1 promoter. All the dsRNAs were separate from CpG islands in the HIC-1 promoter. B. In MCF-7 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were upregulated 6.52-fold by dsHIC1-2998 transfection, compared with mock transfection (P<0.01). In MDA-MB-231 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were 3.37-fold upregulated by dsHIC1-2998 compared with mock (P<0.01).

Restoration of HIC-1 expression by saRNA (dsHIC1-2998) in breast cancer cells.

A. The binding sites of four saRNAs targeting the HIC-1 promoter. All the dsRNAs were separate from CpG islands in the HIC-1 promoter. B. In MCF-7 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were upregulated 6.52-fold by dsHIC1-2998 transfection, compared with mock transfection (P<0.01). In MDA-MB-231 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were 3.37-fold upregulated by dsHIC1-2998 compared with mock (P<0.01). Figure 4A revealed that the expression of HIC-1 mRNA was significantly lower in breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 than in the normal mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A. Relative to a value of 1 for the mRNA expression in MCF-10A cells, the relative HIC-1 expression was 0.045 and 0.703 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, respectively. dsHIC1-2998 (50 nmol/L) was then transfected into MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, and HIC-1 mRNA expression was evaluated using real-time PCR four days after saRNA transfection. In MCF-7 cells, HIC-1 mRNA levels were upregulated 2.2 fold compared with control (P<0.01). In MDA-MB-231 cells, HIC-1 levels were upregulated 5.7-fold compared with control (P<0.01) (Figure 4B). We analyzed cell proliferation curves based on dsHIC1-2998 transfection, and assayed OD450 values serially for 6 days. From days 3−6, OD450 values were reduced significantly in the dsHIC1-2998-tranefected MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells compared with controls (P<0.05) (Figure 4C). Seventy-two hours after dsHIC1-2998 transfection, cells were harvested and stained with annexin-V-FITC and PI, and apoptosis was analyzed using flow cytometry. In MCF-7 cells, the number of total apoptotic dsHIC1-2998-transfected cells was increased significantly compared with mock (19.75% vs. 15.03%, P<0.05). Similarly, the percentage of total apoptotic dsHIC1-2998-transfected MDA-MB-231 cells was increased significantly compared with mock (16.60% vs.5.55%, P<0.05, Figure 4D).
Figure 4

Upregulation of HIC-1 suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis after dsHIC1-2998 transfection.

A. The basal expression levels of HIC-1 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells and MCF-10A normal mammary epithelial cells. The expression of HIC-1 mRNA in the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 was significantly lower than in the normal mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A (P<0.05). B. Reactivation of HIC-1 using the RNAa dsHIC1-2998 inhibited breast cancer cell viability. MCF-7 cells (upper) and MDA-MB-231 (lower) cells were transfected with 50 nmol/L dsRNA, and cell proliferation was assayed at each time point. Data are plotted as mean ± SD. C. Upregulation of HIC-1 promoted total apoptosis in MCF-7 (upper) and MDA-MB-231 (lower) cells after dsHIC1-2998 transfection.

Upregulation of HIC-1 suppresses cell growth and induces apoptosis after dsHIC1-2998 transfection.

A. The basal expression levels of HIC-1 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells and MCF-10A normal mammary epithelial cells. The expression of HIC-1 mRNA in the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 was significantly lower than in the normal mammary epithelial cell line MCF-10A (P<0.05). B. Reactivation of HIC-1 using the RNAa dsHIC1-2998 inhibited breast cancer cell viability. MCF-7 cells (upper) and MDA-MB-231 (lower) cells were transfected with 50 nmol/L dsRNA, and cell proliferation was assayed at each time point. Data are plotted as mean ± SD. C. Upregulation of HIC-1 promoted total apoptosis in MCF-7 (upper) and MDA-MB-231 (lower) cells after dsHIC1-2998 transfection.

Identification of differentially expression genes after the reactivation of HIC-1

We assayed the differentially expressed genes in cancer cells using whole transcriptomic microarrays after restoring HIC-1 expression using dsHIC1-2998 saRNA. Microarray data can be obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (GSE42024). Two standards of statistical value (P<0.01) and fold-change (≥2 or ≤−2) were used as the filtering criteria. Six samples from the HIC-1 reactivation and control groups were analyzed by two-way clustering. A total of 1375 (698 upregulated and 677 downregulated) genes were identified in saRNA treated MCF-7 cells (Figure 5A, 5B). To understand the differentially expressed genes, we present representative genes and their fold-change in Tables 2 and 3. The upregulated genes include those involved in the immune network, antigen processing and presentation, and developmental growth. In contrast, the downregulated genes play roles in processes including cancer, the cell cycle, chromosome segregation, and cell division. The differentially expressed genes in MDA-MB-231 cells are presented in Figure S1, Tables 4 and Tables 5. To confirm the reliability of the microarray, we assessed the mRNA expression of 10 selected genes by quantitative RT-PCR on the original samples used in the microarray: five that were upregulated (TIMP3, NTN4, BIK, CASP4, and IFI35), and five that were downregulated (SKA3, HMMR, CENPF, CKS1B, and UBE2C). The changes in expression of all selected genes were verified in the dsHIC-2998 transfection group compared with control by quantitative RT-PCR (Figure 5C, P<0.05).
Figure 5

Gene expression profiles of whole transcriptome microarrays.

A. Two-way hierarchical clustering heatmap of differentially expressed genes between HIC-1 activated MCF-7 cells and control. Gene expression was significantly different between the two groups. B. Bar chart of up- and downregulated genes based on HIC-1 reactivation in MCF-7 cancer cells. C. mRNA verification of 10 selected genes by quantitative RT-PCR on the same six samples used in the microarray study. Five genes were upregulated (TIMP3, NTN4, BIK, CASP4, and IFI35), and five were downregulated (SKA3, HMMR, CENPF, CKS1B, and UBE2C), which is consistent with the results of the microarray assay.

Table 2

Up-regulated genes upon HIC-1 re-expression in MCF-7*.

Gene symbolGene descriptionGenbank IDFold-change
DEFB4Adefensin, beta 4ANM_00494227.435
S100A7S100 calcium binding protein A7NM_00296326.783
S100A8S100 calcium binding protein A8NM_00296418.481
DEFB1defensin, beta 1NM_00521816.587
S100A9S100 calcium binding protein A9NM_00296516.199
S100A12S100 calcium binding protein A12NM_00562113.528
CFBcomplement factor BNM_00171013.032
PLA2G2Aphospholipase A2, group IIANM_0003009.401
INHBAinhibin, beta ANM_0021928.800
FBXO32F-box protein 32NM_0582298.258
GSTA5glutathione S-transferase alpha 5NM_1536997.987
GPX2glutathione peroxidase 2NM_0020837.134
GSTA2glutathione S-transferase alpha 2NM_0008466.125
ALDH1A3aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A3NM_0006936.108
TIMP3TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3NM_0003625.611
IFNGR1interferon gamma receptor 1NM_0004165.493
MALLmal, T-cell differentiation protein-likeNM_0054345.179
TNFAIP2tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 2NM_0062915.010
NTN4netrin 4NM_0212294.563
CARD6caspase recruitment domain family, member 6NM_0325874.335
CAPN13calpain 13NM_1445753.591
ALDH3B1aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member B1NM_0006943.457
HSPB8heat shock 22 kDa protein 8NM_0143653.409
GLRXglutaredoxin (thioltransferase)NM_0020643.063
SOD2superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrialNM_0010244652.925
BIKBCL2-interacting killer (apoptosis-inducing)NM_0011972.779
CASP4caspase 4, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidaseNM_0333062.547
HOXA5homeobox A5NM_0191022.528
MUC20mucin 20, cell surface associatedNM_1526732.457
GDF15growth differentiation factor 15NM_0048642.449
ANXA3annexin A3NM_0051392.399
HOXB2homeobox B2NM_0021452.382
PLA2G10phospholipase A2, group XNM_0035612.300
KLF5Kruppel-like factor 5NM_0017302.194
IFI35interferon-induced protein 35NM_0055332.172
TMPRSS13transmembrane protease, serine 13NM_0012067902.161
LAMC1laminin, gamma 1NM_0022932.146
IFI44interferon-induced protein 44NM_0064172.122
KLF7Kruppel-like factor 7NM_0037092.111
PRR15proline rich 15NM_1758872.073
LTBRlymphotoxin beta receptorNM_0023422.038

with filters of P<0.01 and fold-changes ≥2.

Table 3

Down-regulated genes upon HIC-1 re-expression in MCF-7*.

Gene symbolGene descriptionGenbank IDFold-change
KREMEN2kringle containing transmembrane protein 2NM_172229−5.753
ZNF695zinc finger protein 695NM_020394−4.125
TNNT1troponin T type 1 (skeletal, slow)NM_01126132−3.892
RHOHras homolog gene family, member HNM_004310−3.722
TFF3trefoil factor 3 (intestinal)NM_003226−3.666
CRLF1cytokine receptor-like factor 1NM_004750−3.551
CENPAcentromere protein ANM_001809−3.329
PTTG1pituitary tumor-transforming 1NM_004219−3.303
E2F7E2F transcription factor 7NM_203394−3.265
CASC5cancer susceptibility candidate 5NM_170589−3.245
YBX2Y box binding protein 2NM_015982−3.210
PTTG2pituitary tumor-transforming 2NM_006607−3.192
AURKBaurora kinase BNM_004217−3.185
PBKPDZ binding kinaseNM_018492−3.149
RASIP1Ras interacting protein 1NM_017805−3.129
MGPmatrix Gla proteinNM_000900−3.097
CDCA7cell division cycle associated 7NM_031942−3.012
NUSAP1nucleolar and spindle associated protein 1NM_016359−2.963
HMMRhyaluronan-mediated motility receptorNM_012484−2.959
TMEM121transmembrane protein 121NM_025268−2.949
SKP2S-phase kinase-associated protein 2NM_032637−2.921
HMGB2high mobility group box 2NM_002129−2.918
CCNA2cyclin A2NM_001237−2.904
CDC25Ccell division cycle 25 homolog CNM_001790−2.887
BMP7bone morphogenetic protein 7NM_001719−2.849
CENPWcentromere protein WNM_01012507−2.810
MKI67antigen identified by antibody Ki-67NM_002417−2.798
RETret proto-oncogeneNM_020975−2.776
CCNB2cyclin B2NM_004701−2.754
SKA3spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3BC013418−2.720
TOP2Atopoisomerase (DNA) II alphaNM_001067−2.717
PLK4polo-like kinase 4NM_014264−2.709
OIP5Opa interacting protein 5NM_007280−2.707
ANP32EAcidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family, member ENM_030920−2.669
CENPFcentromere protein FNM_016343−2.632
RAB31RAB31, member RAS oncogene familyNM_006868−2.556
PLK1polo-like kinase 1NM_005030−2.472
CKS1BCDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1BNM_001826−2.333
UBE2Cubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2NM_181803−2.277
CENPEcentromere protein ENM_001813−2.268
E2F2E2F transcription factor 2NM_004091−2.246

with filters of P<0.01 and fold-changes ≤−2.

Table 4

Up-regulated genes upon HIC-1 reactivation in MDA-MB-231.

Gene symbolGene descriptionGenbank IDFold-change
DEFB4Adefensin, beta 4ANM_00494227.435
S100A7S100 calcium binding protein A7NM_00296326.783
S100A8S100 calcium binding protein A8NM_00296418.481
DEFB1defensin, beta 1NM_00521816.587
S100A9S100 calcium binding protein A9NM_00296516.199
S100A12S100 calcium binding protein A12NM_00562113.528
CFBcomplement factor BNM_00171013.032
PLA2G2Aphospholipase A2, group IIANM_0003009.401
INHBAinhibin, beta ANM_0021928.800
FBXO32F-box protein 32NM_0582298.258
GSTA5glutathione S-transferase alpha 5NM_1536997.987
GPX2glutathione peroxidase 2NM_0020837.134
GSTA2glutathione S-transferase alpha 2NM_0008466.125
ALDH1A3aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family, member A3NM_0006936.108
TIMP3TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 3NM_0003625.611
IFNGR1interferon gamma receptor 1NM_0004165.493
MALLmal, T-cell differentiation protein-likeNM_0054345.179
TNFAIP2tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 2NM_0062915.010
NTN4netrin 4NM_0212294.563
CARD6caspase recruitment domain family, member 6NM_0325874.335
CAPN13calpain 13NM_1445753.591
ALDH3B1aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 family, member B1NM_0006943.457
HSPB8heat shock 22 kDa protein 8NM_0143653.409
GLRXglutaredoxin (thioltransferase)NM_0020643.063
SOD2superoxide dismutase 2, mitochondrialNM_0010244652.925
BIKBCL2-interacting killer (apoptosis-inducing)NM_0011972.779
CASP4caspase 4, apoptosis-related cysteine peptidaseNM_0333062.547
HOXA5homeobox A5NM_0191022.528
MUC20mucin 20, cell surface associatedNM_1526732.457
GDF15growth differentiation factor 15NM_0048642.449
ANXA3annexin A3NM_0051392.399
HOXB2homeobox B2NM_0021452.382
PLA2G10phospholipase A2, group XNM_0035612.300
KLF5Kruppel-like factor 5NM_0017302.194
IFI35interferon-induced protein 35NM_0055332.172
TMPRSS13transmembrane protease, serine 13NM_0012067902.161
LAMC1laminin, gamma 1NM_0022932.146
IFI44interferon-induced protein 44NM_0064172.122
KLF7Kruppel-like factor 7NM_0037092.111
PRR15proline rich 15NM_1758872.073
LTBRlymphotoxin beta receptorNM_0023422.038
Table 5

Down-regulated genes upon HIC-1 reactivation in MDA-MB-231.

Gene symbolGene descriptionGenbank IDFold-change
FAM71E1family with sequence similarity 71NM_138411−3.859
HHLA3HERV-H LTR-associating 3NM_001036645−3.659
CORO2Bcoronin, actin binding protein, 2BNM_006091−2.207
AGBL2ATP/GTP binding protein-like 2NM_024783−2.201
HIST1H4Khistone cluster 1, H4kNM_003541−2.116
PHACTR2phosphatase and actin regulator 2NM_001100164−2.062
TMEM150Atransmembrane protein 150ANM_001031738−2.018
TCEA3transcription elongation factor ANM_003196−1.965
HIST1H2AJhistone cluster 1, H2ajNM_021066−1.900
FBXO32F-box protein 32 (FBXO32)NM_058229−1.854
SPRR2Esmall proline-rich protein 2ENM_001024209−1.819
ADAMTSL3ADAMTS-like 3NM_207517−1.814
PIK3IP1phosphoinositide-3-kinase interacting protein 1NM_052880−1.802
ATF3activating transcription factor 3NM_001040619−1.782
WFDC2WAP four-disulfide core domain 2NM_006103−1.767
S100A2S100 calcium binding protein A2NM_005978−1.766
HIST1H4Dhistone cluster 1, H4dNM_003539−1.756
ANXA8L2annexin A8-like 2NM_001630−1.755
PRR15proline rich 15NM_175887−1.754
PDGFAplatelet-derived growth factor alpha polypeptideNM_002607−1.745
EDN2endothelin 2NM_001956−1.725
GPR87G protein-coupled receptor 87NM_023915−1.716
HSPA13heat shock protein 70 kDa family, member 13NM_006948−1.713
ITGBL1integrin, beta-like 1NM_004791−1.691
MED28mediator complex subunit 28NM_025205−1.689
COL4A6collagen, type IV, alpha 6NM_033641−1.667
GDF15growth differentiation factor 15NM_004864−1.658
CTSScathepsin SNM_004079−1.623
BMP10bone morphogenetic protein 10NM_014482−1.597
HIST2H2BEhistone cluster 2, H2beNM_003528−1.572
PF4platelet factor 4NM_002619−1.572
CD109CD109 moleculeNM_133493−1.562
CTSL2cathepsin L2NM_001333−1.553
THBS1thrombospondin 1NM_003246−1.552
CD3ECD3e moleculeNM_000733−1.550
RDH16retinol dehydrogenase 16NM_003708−1.546
CADM1cell adhesion molecule 1NM_014333−1.538
PCDHB14protocadherin beta 14NM_018934−1.536
TFPI2tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2NM_006528−1.533
AKAP12A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 12NM_144497−1.529
NCOA7nuclear receptor coactivator 7NM_181782−1.519

Gene expression profiles of whole transcriptome microarrays.

A. Two-way hierarchical clustering heatmap of differentially expressed genes between HIC-1 activated MCF-7 cells and control. Gene expression was significantly different between the two groups. B. Bar chart of up- and downregulated genes based on HIC-1 reactivation in MCF-7 cancer cells. C. mRNA verification of 10 selected genes by quantitative RT-PCR on the same six samples used in the microarray study. Five genes were upregulated (TIMP3, NTN4, BIK, CASP4, and IFI35), and five were downregulated (SKA3, HMMR, CENPF, CKS1B, and UBE2C), which is consistent with the results of the microarray assay. with filters of P<0.01 and fold-changes ≥2. with filters of P<0.01 and fold-changes ≤−2.

Discussion

HIC-1 is a gene that is hypermethylated in cancer, and is commonly downregulated in human breast cancer. According to immunohistochemical studies using tissue microarrays, HIC-1 is expressed mainly in the nucleus and cytoplasm of mammary ductal epithelium. HIC-1 expression is also reduced in mammary cancer cells. In the present study, 62.5% of breast cancer samples revealed low levels of expression of HIC-1 in tissue microarray analysis. However, HIC-1 protein expression was retained in some breast carcinoma samples. There was also a trend for the downregulation of HIC-1 in older patients. Recently, Foveau et al. overexpressed HIC-1 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, which resulted in impaired cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro. They also revealed that the tyrosine kinase receptor EphA2 is a direct target gene of HIC-1 [24]. Boulay et al. found that the β2 adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) is also a direct target of HIC-1. Consistent with this, the inactivation of HIC-1 in breast carcinoma predisposed cells to stress-induced metastasis via the up-regulation of ADRB2 [12]. To date, there is no systematic study of the precise mechanisms and molecular pathways modulated by HIC-1. RNAa is emerging as a potential solution by using double-stranded RNA to increase endogenous gene expression. This novel technology opens a door for reactivating the expression of silenced tumor suppressor genes [15], . Several successful studies demonstrated that dsRNAs targeting promoter regions effectively restored gene expression. Chen et al. transfected saRNA targeting the p21 promoter, and induced p21 expression in T24 and J82 bladder cancer cell lines. In addition, dsP21 transfection inhibited bladder cancer cell proliferation and clonogenicity significantly [29]. Mao and colleagues induced E-cadherin expression by saRNA, which suppressed the migration and invasion of 5637 human bladder cancer cells in vitro. They proposed that the activation of E-cadherin by saRNA could have therapeutic benefits for bladder malignancies [30]. Huang et al. evaluated RNAa in cells derived from four mammalian species including nonhuman primates (African green monkey and chimpanzee), mice, and rats. Transfection of human saRNA into African green monkey and chimpanzee cells resulted in the induction of the target gene. The authors proposed that nonhuman primate disease models could have clinical application for validating RNAa-based drugs [23]. For example, RNAa-mediated overexpression of WT1 may have therapeutic potential in hepatocellular carcinoma [31]. Li et al. developed a 2′-fluoro-modified derivative (dsP21-322-2′F) in lipid nanoparticles, which facilitated the activation of p21 in vivo and led to the regression/disappearance of tumors in 40% of the treated mice [32]. Recently, we reported the reactivating efficacy of saRNAs on the tumor suppressor HIC-1 in gastric cancer. The upregulation of HIC-1 resulted in obvious anti-cancer effects [22]. Here, we screened gene expression in breast cancer, and confirmed that HIC-1 is generally downregulated in breast cancer. Next, we used RNAa to reverse HIC-1 expression in combination with 5-CdR treatment. By assessing four different dsRNAs, we identified one functional saRNA targeted to the −2998 region of the HIC-1 promoter, and revealed strong efficacy for HIC-1 expression. We next evaluated the altered expression profiles after saRNA transfection in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. After the re-expression of HIC-1 gene, there were 1375 differentially expressed genes between the HIC-1 activation group and control in MCF-7 cells (P<0.01 and fold change ≥2 or ≤−2). The upregulated genes were involved in immune activity, the inhibition of invasion, and apoptosis, whereas the downregulated genes played roles in cell migration, cell division, and cell cycle progression. For example, TIMP3, which was upregulated after HIC-1 activation, encodes metallopeptidase inhibitor 3, which inhibits matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the extracellular matrix (ECM). Increased expression of MMPs was closely correlated with tumor invasion and metastasis [33−36]. CASP4 was upregulated after HIC-1 activation, which is an apoptosis-related cysteine peptidase [37], [38]. BIK, which is a BCL2-interacting killer related to apoptotic induction, was also upregulated [39−42]. The expression of BIK is known to have prognostic significance in breast cancer [43]. UBE2C/UBCH10 encodes the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2C, which is downregulated after HIC-1 reactivation. Psyrri and colleagues found that elevated UBE2C mRNA expression was associated with poor disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer [44]. High tumor grade, as well as increased Ki67 protein expression, was more frequent in tumors with a high level of expression of UBE2C [45−47]. Therefore, the biological role of the growth inhibition after restoration of HIC-1 may be related partially to reduced UBE2C expression. HMMR/RHAMM (CD168) is a hyaluronan-mediated motility receptor and cell surface oncogenic protein that is commonly upregulated in human cancers. Its expression correlates well with cell motility and invasion [48−51]. Sankaran et al. reported that MTA1 (metastatic tumor antigen 1) is an upstream co-activator of HMMR expression [52]. HMMR encodes a nonintegral cell surface hyaluronan receptor and intracellular protein that promotes cell motility in vitro [53]. Our study revealed for the first time that HIC-1 is an upstream inhibitor of HMMR expression. CENPF is a 350/400 KDa centromere protein F (mitosin). Ueda and coworkers found that CENPF was upregulated in tumors with a high proliferation rate in breast cancer. They proposed that CENPF was a prognostic indicator for primary breast cancer [54]. Restoring the tumor suppressor function of HIC-1 gene may partially derive benefit from reduced CENPF expression on breast cancer cells. In addition, other targets such as SKA3, NTN4, IFI35, and CKS1B that were downregulated by HIC-1 activation exert important biological functions [55−67]. Chen and colleagues proposed that loss of HIC-1 function promoted tumorigenesis via the activation of the stress-controlling protein SIRT1, thereby attenuating p53 function. The inactivation of HIC-1 resulted in upregulated SIRT1 expression in normal or cancer cells [68]. Foveau and coworkers found that the tyrosine kinase receptor EphA2 was a direct target gene of HIC-1. The upregulation of EphA2 was correlated with increased cell migration [24]. However, we did not find SIRT1 or EphA2 in the list of differentially expressed genes, although the ephrin family member EFNB3 was downregulated upon HIC-1 reactivation. This may be due to the relatively limited sensitivity of the microarray. Consistent with this, we assessed the mRNA expression levels of SIRT1, EFNB3, and several apoptosis-regulating genes (BIK, CASP3, CASP4, and CASP9) in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells. Both SIRT1 and EFNB3 were decreased significantly upon HIC-1 reactivation. Of the four apoptosis-regulating genes, the mRNA levels of BIK and CASP4 were increased significantly (Figure S2), as assessed by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. Personalized targeted therapy is an upcoming trend for breast cancer treatment. Although targeted therapy for HER-2 amplification is very effective, its benefits are limited to a specific proportion of patients. Therefore, it is important to develop additional molecular targets or drugs. In present study, we successfully activated the tumor suppressor gene HIC-1 using saRNA (dsHIC1-2998) in breast cancer cells. Our results supported the hypothesis that the expression of tumor suppressor genes can be restored. Since saRNAs are small molecules, they can easily penetrate cells. For use as a gene therapy, saRNA is superior to traditional viral vector-based gene transfer. Therefore, RNAa is a potentially useful strategy for targeting specific genes. This study is the first to analyze global gene expression profiles based on HIC-1 gene reactivation, and outlines a set of important genes involved in the carcinogenesis and progression of breast cancer. In conclusion, the findings described in the current study may provide valuable information not only for gene functional studies such as the regulation of gene expression and molecular mechanisms, but also for potential clinical applications, such as developing therapeutic drugs for breast cancer. Two-way hierarchical clustering heatmap of differentially expressed genes between HIC-1 activated MDA-MB-231 cells and control. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. saRNAs effectively activate HIC-1 expression influence downstream genes levels in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. A. After 50 nM dsHIC1-2998 activation for 72 hrs on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, the SIRT1 and EFNB3 mRNA levels were down-regulated by real-time PCR. Relative to a value of 1 for mRNA expression of SIRT1 by mock, the relative mRNA expressions of HIC-1 were 0.679. Relative to a value of 1 for mRNA expression of EFNB3 by mock, the relative mRNA expressions of HIC-1 was 0.427 in MCF-7 cells. While, Relative to a value of 1 for mRNA expression of SIRT1 by mock, the relative mRNA expressions of HIC-1 were 0.537. Relative to a value of 1 for mRNA expression of EFNB3 by mock, the relative mRNA expressions of HIC-1 was 0.466 in MDA-MB-231 cells. B. After 50 nM dsHIC1-2998 activation for 72 hrs on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells, The mRNA levels of BIK, CASP3, CASP4 and CASP9 were assayed by real-time PCR. Relative to control, the mRNA levels of BIK increased 2.854-fold, and the mRNA levels of CASP4 increased 1.533-fold in MCF-7 cells. But the mRNA levels of CASP3 and CASP9 did not change obviously. In MDA-MB-231 cells, relative to control, the mRNA levels of BIK increased 2.906-fold, and the mRNA levels of CASP4 increased 2.090-fold. But the mRNA levels of CASP3 and CASP9 did not change obviously. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.
  68 in total

1.  Overexpression of Cks1 is associated with poor survival by inhibiting apoptosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiao-Chun Wang; Li-Li Tian; Jing Tian; Hai-Liang Wu; Ai-Min Meng
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Trastuzumab for the treatment of primary breast cancer in HER2-positive women: a single technology appraisal.

Authors:  S Ward; H Pilgrim; D Hind
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  HER2 overexpression increases sensitivity to gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, through inhibition of HER2/HER3 heterodimer formation in lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Akira Hirata; Fumihito Hosoi; Miho Miyagawa; Shu-ichi Ueda; Seiji Naito; Teruhiko Fujii; Michihiko Kuwano; Mayumi Ono
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Double strand RNA-guided endogeneous E-cadherin up-regulation induces the apoptosis and inhibits proliferation of breast carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Wei Junxia; Gao Ping; Han Yuan; Zhang Lijun; Ren Jihong; Lin Fang; Long Min; Wang Xi; He Ting; Dong Ke; Zhang Huizhong
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  p53 activates expression of HIC-1, a new candidate tumour suppressor gene on 17p13.3.

Authors:  M M Wales; M A Biel; W el Deiry; B D Nelkin; J P Issa; W K Cavenee; S J Kuerbitz; S B Baylin
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  High Cks1 expression in transgenic and carcinogen-initiated mammary tumors is not always accompanied by reduction in p27Kip1.

Authors:  Louise Westbrook; Harish N Ramanathan; Tatyana Isayeva; Anshu Roy Mittal; Zhican Qu; Michael D Johnson; Francis G Kern; Selvarangan Ponnazhagan; Clinton J Grubbs; Jaideep V Thottassery
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Up-regulation of E-cadherin by small activating RNA inhibits cell invasion and migration in 5637 human bladder cancer cells.

Authors:  Qiqi Mao; Yubing Li; Xiangyi Zheng; Kai Yang; Huafeng Shen; Jie Qin; Yu Bai; Debo Kong; Xiaolong Jia; Liping Xie
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Small RNA: can RNA interference be exploited for therapy?

Authors:  Nathan R Wall; Yang Shi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Expression of centromere protein F (CENP-F) associated with higher FDG uptake on PET/CT, detected by cDNA microarray, predicts high-risk patients with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Shigeto Ueda; Nobuo Kondoh; Hitoshi Tsuda; Souhei Yamamoto; Hideki Asakawa; Kazuhiko Fukatsu; Takayuki Kobayashi; Junji Yamamoto; Katsumi Tamura; Jiro Ishida; Yoshiyuki Abe; Mikio Yamamoto; Hidetaka Mochizuki
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Validation of UBE2C protein as a prognostic marker in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  D Loussouarn; L Campion; F Leclair; M Campone; C Charbonnel; G Ricolleau; W Gouraud; R Bataille; P Jézéquel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  RNA activation technique and its applications in cancer research.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Wang; Long Yuan; Yan-Ling Li; Si-Jie Gan; Lin Ren; Fan Zhang; Jun Jiang; Xiao-Wei Qi
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Mutual interaction between BCL6 and miRNAs contributing to the pathogenesis of various cancers.

Authors:  Z Wei; W Gao; Y Wu; B Ni; Y Tian
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Reactivation of HIC-1 gene by saRNA inhibits clonogenicity and invasiveness in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Shengli Pan; Yan Gu; Shanyu Guo; Qiancheng Dai; Yingyan Yu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Demystifying the mechanistic and functional aspects of p21 gene activation with double-stranded RNAs in human cancer cells.

Authors:  Huan-Lei Wu; Sen-Mao Li; Jia Hu; Xiao Yu; Hua Xu; Zhong Chen; Zhang-Qun Ye
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-17

5.  Cross-Database Analysis Reveals Sensitive Biomarkers for Combined Therapy for ERBB2+ Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Xiang; Xia Huang; Jiexuan Wang; Jun Zhang; Jun Ji; Ranlin Yan; Zhenggang Zhu; Wei Cai; Yingyan Yu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 6.  Therapeutic Potential of Small Activating RNAs (saRNAs) in Human Cancers.

Authors:  Sorah Yoon; John J Rossi
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.837

7.  miR‑28‑5p inhibits the migration of breast cancer by regulating WSB2.

Authors:  Liang Ma; Yunfeng Zhang; Fen Hu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.101

8.  A Novel Prognosis Signature Based on Ferroptosis-Related Gene DNA Methylation Data for Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xuequan Wang; Yinnan Meng; Changxin Liu; Haihua Yang; Suna Zhou
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.501

9.  Expression and role of HEPIS in breast cancer.

Authors:  Fen Hu; Yunfeng Zhang; Mi Li; Yun Bai; Xiujun Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 10.  Small Activating RNAs: Towards the Development of New Therapeutic Agents and Clinical Treatments.

Authors:  Hossein Ghanbarian; Shahin Aghamiri; Mohamad Eftekhary; Nicole Wagner; Kay-Dietrich Wagner
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.