Literature DB >> 24489522

Forcefield_PTM: Ab Initio Charge and AMBER Forcefield Parameters for Frequently Occurring Post-Translational Modifications.

George A Khoury1, Jeff P Thompson1, James Smadbeck1, Chris A Kieslich1, Christodoulos A Floudas1.   

Abstract

In this work, we introduce Forcefield_PTM, a set of AMBER forcefield parameters consistent with ff03 for 32 common post-translational modifications. Partial charges were calculated through ab initio calculations and a two-stage RESP-fitting procedure in an n class="Chemical">ether-like implicit solvent environment. The charges were found to be generally consistent with others previously reported for phosphorylated amino acids, and trimethyllysine, using different parameterization methods. Pairs of modified and their corresponding unmodified structures were curated from the PDB for both single and multiple modifications. Background structural similarity was assessed in the context of secondary and tertiary structures from the global dataset. Next, the charges derived for Forcefield_PTM were tested on a macroscopic scale using unrestrained all-atom Langevin molecular dynamics simulations in AMBER for 34 (17 pairs of modified/unmodified) systems in implicit solvent. Assessment was performed in the context of secondary structure preservation, stability in energies, and correlations between the modified and unmodified structure trajectories on the aggregate. As an illustration of their utility, the parameters were used to compare the structural stability of the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of OdhI. Microscopic comparisons between quantum and AMBER single point energies along key χ torsions on several PTMs were performed and corrections to improve their agreement in terms of mean squared errors and squared correlation coefficients were parameterized. This forcefield for post-translational modifications in condensed-phase simulations can be applied to a number of biologically relevant and timely applications including protein structure prediction, protein and peptide design, docking, and to study the effect of PTMs on folding and dynamics. We make the derived parameters and an associated interactive webtool capable of performing post-translational modifications on proteins using Forcefield_PTM available at http://selene.princeton.edu/FFPTM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMBER; ff03; forcefield; partial charges; post-translational modifications

Year:  2013        PMID: 24489522      PMCID: PMC3904396          DOI: 10.1021/ct400556v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  72 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Directed evolution of a genetic circuit.

Authors:  Yohei Yokobayashi; Ron Weiss; Frances H Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A point-charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed-phase quantum mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Yong Duan; Chun Wu; Shibasish Chowdhury; Mathew C Lee; Guoming Xiong; Wei Zhang; Rong Yang; Piotr Cieplak; Ray Luo; Taisung Lee; James Caldwell; Junmei Wang; Peter Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  OptCDR: a general computational method for the design of antibody complementarity determining regions for targeted epitope binding.

Authors:  R J Pantazes; C D Maranas
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

7.  Protein structure prediction by pro-Sp3-TASSER.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A novel approach for untargeted post-translational modification identification using integer linear optimization and tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Richard C Baliban; Peter A DiMaggio; Mariana D Plazas-Mayorca; Nicolas L Young; Benjamin A Garcia; Christodoulos A Floudas
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Force field parameters for the simulation of modified histone tails.

Authors:  Cédric Grauffel; Roland H Stote; Annick Dejaegere
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Conformational changes in protein loops and helices induced by post-translational phosphorylation.

Authors:  Eli S Groban; Arjun Narayanan; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  40 in total

Review 1.  Force field development and simulations of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 2.  Redox Systems Biology: Harnessing the Sentinels of the Cysteine Redoxome.

Authors:  Jason M Held
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Recent Force Field Strategies for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.

Authors:  Junxi Mu; Hao Liu; Jian Zhang; Ray Luo; Hai-Feng Chen
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Effects of Acetylation and Phosphorylation on Subunit Interactions in Three Large Eukaryotic Complexes.

Authors:  Nikolina Šoštarić; Francis J O'Reilly; Piero Giansanti; Albert J R Heck; Anne-Claude Gavin; Vera van Noort
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Computational structural enzymology methodologies for the study and engineering of fatty acid synthases, polyketide synthases and nonribosomal peptide synthetases.

Authors:  Andrew J Schaub; Gabriel O Moreno; Shiji Zhao; Hau V Truong; Ray Luo; Shiou-Chuan Tsai
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  The atomistic level structure for the activated human κ-opioid receptor bound to the full Gi protein and the MP1104 agonist.

Authors:  Amirhossein Mafi; Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phosphorylation of Histone Deacetylase 8: Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Phosphomimetic S39E Mutant.

Authors:  Katherine R Welker Leng; Carol Ann Castañeda; Christophe Decroos; Barira Islam; Shozeb M Haider; David W Christianson; Carol A Fierke
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Mechanistic View of hnRNPA2 Low-Complexity Domain Structure, Interactions, and Phase Separation Altered by Mutation and Arginine Methylation.

Authors:  Veronica H Ryan; Gregory L Dignon; Gül H Zerze; Charlene V Chabata; Rute Silva; Alexander E Conicella; Joshua Amaya; Kathleen A Burke; Jeetain Mittal; Nicolas L Fawzi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Palmitoylation of caspase-6 by HIP14 regulates its activation.

Authors:  Niels H Skotte; Shaun S Sanders; Roshni R Singaraja; Dagmar E Ehrnhoefer; Kuljeet Vaid; Xiaofan Qiu; Srinivasaragavan Kannan; Chandra Verma; Michael R Hayden
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  Web-ARM: A Web-Based Interface for the Automatic Construction of QM/MM Models of Rhodopsins.

Authors:  Laura Pedraza-González; María Del Carmen Marín; Alejandro N Jorge; Tyler D Ruck; Xuchun Yang; Alessio Valentini; Massimo Olivucci; Luca De Vico
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.956

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.